From Generic to Branded: A Model of Spillover in Paid Search Advertising
Open accessAbstract
In Internet paid search advertising, marketers pay for search engines to serve text advertisements in response to keyword searches that are generic (e.g., “hotels”) or branded (e.g., “Hilton Hotels”). Although standalone metrics usually show that generic keywords have higher apparent costs to the advertiser than branded keywords, generic search may create a spillover effect on subsequent branded search. Building on the Nerlove–Arrow advertising framework, the authors propose a dynamic linear model to capture the potential spillover from generic to branded paid search. In the model, generic search advertisements serve to expose users to information about the brand's ability to meet their needs, raising awareness that the brand is relevant to the search. In turn, this can induce additional future search activity for keywords that include the brand name. Using a Bayesian estimation approach, the authors apply the model to data from a paid search campaign for a major lodging chain. The results show that generic search activity positively affects future branded search activity through awareness of relevance. However, branded search does not affect generic search, demonstrating that the spillover is asymmetric. The findings have implications for understanding search behavior on the Internet and the management of paid search advertising.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Internet search and social media activities are higher during the week than on weekends.
“This is in line with previous research that showed Internet search and social media activities are higher during the week than on weekends (De Vries, Gensler, and Leeflang 2012; Rutz and Bucklin 2011).”
From Influencer Marketing on Instagram: Empirical Research on Social Media Engagement with Sponsored Posts (2022) · cites this paper as Rutz and Bucklin 2011
The “Indicator variables for day of week and month” section reports lower weekend search activity, with a negative Saturday effect and a positive Monday effect. The “Test for Reverse Spillover” section likewise describes a steep drop in search activity beginning Friday. These passages support the Internet-search portion of the claim, but not the social-media portion. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredSocial media activities and engagement might vary between weekend and weekdays.
“First, social media activities and engagement might vary between weekend and weekdays.”
From Influencer Marketing on Instagram: Empirical Research on Social Media Engagement with Sponsored Posts (2022) · cites this paper as Rutz and Bucklin 2011
The paper’s “Indicator variables for day of week and month” section reports lower weekend search activity, with negative Saturday and positive Monday effects. This supports a weekday–weekend difference in paid-search activity, but the paper does not establish that social media activity or engagement varies in the same way. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 14
- Bass, Frank, Norris Bruce, Sumit Majundar and B.P.S. Murthi (2007), "A Dynamic Bayesian Model of the Advertising-Sales Relationship," Marketing Science, 26(2), 179-195.
- Bradlow, Eric T. and David C. Schmittlein (2000), "The Little Engines that Could: Modeling the Performance of World Wide Web Search Engines," Marketing Science, 19 (1), 43-62.
- Chatterjee, Patrali, Donna L. Hoffman, and Thomas P. Novak (2003), "Modeling the Clickstream," Marketing Science, 22 (4), 520-541.
- Cho, Chang-Hoan and Hongsik J. Cheon (2004), "Why do People avoid Advertising on the Internet?," Journal of Advertising, 33 (4), 89-97.
- Danaher, Peter and Guy Mullarkey (2003), "Factors Affecting Online Advertising Recall: A Study of Students," Journal of Advertising Research, 43 (3), 252-267.
- Dreze, Xavier and Francois-Xavier Hussherr (2004), "Internet Advertising: Is Anybody Watching?," Journal of Interactive Marketing, 17 (4), 8-23.
- Edelman, Benjamin, Michael Ostrovsky, and Michael Schwarz (2007), "Internet Advertising and the Generalized Second Price Auction," American Economic Review, 97 (1), 373-399.
- Johnson, Eric J., Wendy Moe, Peter Fader, Steven Bellman, and Gerald L. Lohse (2004), "On the Depth and the Dynamics of Online Search Behavior," Management Science, 50 (3), 299-308.
- Manchanda, Puneet, Jean-Pierre Dubé, Khim Yong Goh, and Pradeep K. Chintagunta (2006), "The Effects of Banner Advertising on Internet Purchasing," Journal of Marketing Research, 43 (1), 98-108.
- Moore, Robert, Claire Allison Stammerjohan, and Robin Coulter (2005), "Banner Advertiser- Web Site Congruity and Color Effects on Attention and Attitudes," Journal of Advertising, 34 (2), 71-84.
- Naik, Prasad A., Murali K. Mantrala, and Alan G. Sawyer (1998), "Planning Media Schedules in the Presence of Dynamic Advertising Quality," Marketing Science, 17 (3), 214-235.
- Nerlove, Marc and Kenneth J. Arrow (1962), "Optimal Advertising Policy under Dynamic Conditions," Economica, 29 (114), 129-142.
- Novak, Thomas P. and Donna L. Hoffman (2000), "Advertising and Pricing Models for the Web," in Internet Publishing and Beyond, Cambridge: MIT Press.
- Telang, Rahul, Peter Boatwright, and Tridas Mukhopadhyay (2004), "A Mixture Model for Internet Search Engine Visits," Journal of Marketing Research, 41 (2), 206-214.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Digital marketing: a framework, review, and research agenda
Kannan, P. K., & Li, H. “. (2017) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2016.11.006 · Cited by 1,707 · see citing works
Factors influencing popularity of branded content in Facebook fan pages
Sabate, F., Berbegal-Mirabent, J., Cañabate, A., & Lebherz, P. R. (2014) · European Management Journal · doi:10.1016/j.emj.2014.05.001 · Cited by 557 · see citing works
The Importance of Trust for Personalized Online Advertising
Bleier, A., & Eisenbeiss, M. (2015) · Journal of Retailing · doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2015.04.001 · Cited by 529 · see citing works
The personalization-privacy paradox: Implications for new media
Aguirre, E., Roggeveen, A. L., Grewal, D., & Wetzels, M. (2016) · Journal of Consumer Marketing · doi:10.1108/jcm-06-2015-1458 · Cited by 251 · see citing works
Crumbs of the Cookie: User Profiling in Customer-Base Analysis and Behavioral Targeting
Trusov, M., Ma, L., & Jamal, Z. (2016) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.2015.0956 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
How does consumer engagement evolve when brands post across multiple social media?
Unnava, V., & Aravindakshan, A. (2021) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-021-00785-z · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Effect of temporal spacing between advertising exposures: Evidence from online field experiments
Sahni, N. S. (2015) · Quantitative Marketing and Economics · doi:10.1007/s11129-015-9159-9 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Gross, J., & von Wangenheim, F. (2022) · Journal of Interactive Advertising · doi:10.1080/15252019.2022.2123724 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
- Authors
- Rutz, O. J., & Bucklin, R. E.
- Affiliations
- Yale University (US)
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Corresponding author
- Rutz, Oliver J.
- Bucklin, Randolph E.
- Venue
- Journal of Marketing Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2011-02
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 87-102
- ISSN
- 0022-2437 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-7193
- OpenAlex
- W2179252414
- Cited by
- 360
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 20
- FWCI
- 105.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- archive.nyu.edu
- Locations
- Journal of Marketing Research (publishedVersion)
- Faculty Digital Archive (New York University Florence) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Marketing and Social Media
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Marketing and Advertising Strategies
- Keywords
- search engine advertising, spillover effects, brand awareness, search behavior, hotel industry
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review