Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 115

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Why Does the Lung Hyperinflate?

Ferguson, Gary T.·2006·Proceedings of the American Thoracic Society

Abstract

Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) often have some degree of hyperinflation of the lungs. Hyperinflated lungs can produce significant detrimental effects on breathing, as highlighted by improvements in patient symptoms after lung volume reduction surgery. Measures of lung volumes correlate better with impairment of patient functional capabilities than do measures of airflow. Understanding the mechanisms by which hyperinflation occurs in COPD provides better insight into how treatments can improve patients' health. Both static and dynamic processes can contribute to lung hyperinflation in COPD. Static hyperinflation is caused by a decrease in elasticity of the lung due to emphysema. The lungs exert less recoil pressure to counter the recoil pressure of the chest wall, resulting in an equilibrium of recoil forces at a higher resting volume than normal. Dynamic hyperinflation is more common and can occur independent of or in addition to static hyperinflation. It results from air being trapped within the lungs after each breath due to a disequilibrium between the volumes inhaled and exhaled. The ability to fully exhale depends on the degree of airflow limitation and the time available for exhalation. These can both vary, causing greater hyperinflation during exacerbations or increased respiratory demand, such as during exercise. Reversibility of dynamic hyperinflation offers the possibility for intervention. Use of bronchodilators with prolonged durations of action, such as tiotropium, can sustain significant reductions in lung inflation similar in effect to lung volume reduction surgery. How efficacy of bronchodilators is assessed may, therefore, need to be reevaluated.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1513/pats.200508-094do

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. 1999, Eur Respir J, 13, 686, 10.1183/09031936.99.13368699 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 1997, Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 155, 1984, 10.1164/ajrccm.155.6.9196106 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 1999, Eur Respir J, 13, 468, 10.1183/09031936.99.13246899 · DOI
  4. 2002, Intensive Care Med, 28, 1552, 10.1007/s00134-002-1515-z · DOI
  5. 2002, Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 166, 518, 10.1164/rccm.166.4.518 · DOI
  6. 2002, Chest, 121, 1042, 10.1378/chest.121.4.1042 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 2003, Thorax, 58, 855, 10.1136/thorax.58.10.855 · DOI
  8. 2003, Chest, 124, 1743, 10.1378/chest.124.5.1743 · DOI
  9. 2004, Eur Respir J, 23, 832, 10.1183/09031936.04.00116004 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Ferguson, G. T.
Venue
Proceedings of the American Thoracic Society
Published
2006-04-01
Volume
3
Issue
2
Pages
176-179
ISSN
  • 1546-3222
  • 1943-5665
Cited by
115
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.