The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Conceptual Revolutions
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The history of science suggests that theory change often requires a series of empirical anomalies, which collectively appear to be better explained by an alternate theory (T.Kuhn, 1962;Thagard, 1992).”
From The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implications for science instruction. (1993) · cites this paper as Thagard, 1992
In the citing paper
“He (Thagard, 1992) concludes that “for most revolutions, the explanatory breadth of the new theory--how much it explains--is the largest contributor to explanatory coherence” (p.248).”
From The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implications for science instruction. (1993) · cites this paper as Thagard, 1992
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Pintrich, P. R., Marx, R. W., & Boyle, R. A. (1993) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543063002167 · Cited by 2,286
Chinn, C. A., & Brewer, W. F. (1993) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543063001001 · Cited by 1,393
Conceptual change: A powerful framework for improving science teaching and learning
Duit, R., & Treagust, D. F. (2003) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500690305016 · Cited by 1,293
Science Education in Three-Part Harmony: Balancing Conceptual, Epistemic, and Social Learning Goals
Duschl, R. A. (2008) · Review of Research in Education · doi:10.3102/0091732x07309371 · Cited by 1,078
What changes in conceptual change?
diSessa, A. A., & Sherin, B. L. (1998) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/0950069980201002 · Cited by 690
Metadata
- Authors
- Thagard, P.
- Corresponding author
- Thagard, Paul
- ORCID
- Thagard, Paul
- Venue
- Princeton University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Princeton University Press
- Published
- 1992-12-31
- OpenAlex
- W4235165656
- Cited by
- 1,066
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 42 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 65 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 39 · 2012: 31
- FWCI
- 51.79
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Princeton University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy of Biology and Scientific Explanation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Logic and Philosophy of Science
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Diverse Historical and Scientific Studies
- Keywords
- conceptual revolutions, conceptual change, scientific revolution, philosophy of science
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
