The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Conceptual Revolutions
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The history of science suggests that theory change often requires a series of empirical anomalies, which collectively appear to be better explained by an alternate theory (T.Kuhn, 1962;Thagard, 1992).”
From The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implications for science instruction. (1993) · cites this paper as Thagard, 1992
In the citing paper
“He (Thagard, 1992) concludes that “for most revolutions, the explanatory breadth of the new theory--how much it explains--is the largest contributor to explanatory coherence” (p.248).”
From The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implications for science instruction. (1993) · cites this paper as Thagard, 1992
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Pintrich, P. R., Marx, R. W., & Boyle, R. A. (1993) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543063002167 · Cited by 2,286
Chinn, C. A., & Brewer, W. F. (1993) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543063001001 · Cited by 1,393
Conceptual change: A powerful framework for improving science teaching and learning
Duit, R., & Treagust, D. F. (2003) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500690305016 · Cited by 1,293
Science Education in Three-Part Harmony: Balancing Conceptual, Epistemic, and Social Learning Goals
Duschl, R. A. (2008) · Review of Research in Education · doi:10.3102/0091732x07309371 · Cited by 1,078
What changes in conceptual change?
diSessa, A. A., & Sherin, B. L. (1998) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/0950069980201002 · Cited by 690
Sociocognitive Dynamics in a Product Market
Rosa, J. A., Porac, J. F., Runser-Spanjol, J., & Saxon, M. S. (1999) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/00222429990634s108 · Cited by 589
Explaining Away: A Model of Affective Adaptation
Wilson, T. D., & Gilbert, D. T. (2008) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00085.x · Cited by 543
Taber, K. S. (2013) · Chemistry Education Research and Practice · doi:10.1039/c3rp00012e · Cited by 479
Designs for Collective Cognitive Responsibility in Knowledge-Building Communities
Zhang, J., Scardamalia, M., Reeve, R., & Messina, R. (2009) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1080/10508400802581676 · Cited by 472
Tynjälä, P. (1999) · International Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1016/s0883-0355(99)00012-9 · Cited by 458
BIASES IN THE INTERPRETATION AND USE OF RESEARCH RESULTS
MacCoun, R. J. (1998) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.259 · Cited by 436
Simonton, D. K. (2004) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139165358 · Cited by 445
Theory Construction Methodology: A Practical Framework for Building Theories in Psychology
Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H. L. J., Dalege, J., Kievit, R., & Haig, B. D. (2021) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691620969647 · Cited by 384
Model based learning as a key research area for science education
Clement, J. J. (2000) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/095006900416901 · Cited by 375
Learning progressions and teaching sequences: a review and analysis
Duschl, R. A., Seungho, M., & Sezen‐Barrie, A. (2011) · Studies in Science Education · doi:10.1080/03057267.2011.604476 · Cited by 409
Two Views About Explicitly Teaching Nature of Science
Duschl, R. A., & Grandy, R. E. (2012) · Science & Education · doi:10.1007/s11191-012-9539-4 · Cited by 375
Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms
Driver, R., Newton, P. E., & Osborne, J. F. (2000) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/(sici)1098-237x(200005)84:3 · Cited by 2,339
An Abductive Theory of Scientific Method.
Haig, B. D. (2005) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.10.4.371 · Cited by 347
Schurz, G. (2007) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-007-9223-4 · Cited by 350
Treagust, D. F., & Duit, R. H. (2008) · Cultural Studies of Science Education · doi:10.1007/s11422-008-9090-4 · Cited by 336
The cognitive basis of model-based reasoning in science
Nersessian, N. J. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511613517.008 · Cited by 324
Read, S. J., Vanman, E. J., & Miller, L. C. (1997) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0101_3 · Cited by 286
The Cognitive Basis of Science
Carruthers, P., Stich, S., & Siegal, M. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511613517 · Cited by 287
Coherence versus fragmentation in the development of the concept of force
diSessa, A. A., GILLESPIE, N., & Esterly, J. (2004) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1016/j.cogsci.2004.05.003 · Cited by 421
An Overview of Conceptual Change Theories
Özdemir, G., & Clark, D. B. (2007) · Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education · doi:10.12973/ejmste/75414 · Cited by 282
A model of legal reasoning with cases incorporating theories and values
Bench-Capon, T. J. M., & Sartor, G. (2003) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/s0004-3702(03)00108-5 · Cited by 259
Analogical Reasoning and Conceptual Change: A Case Study of Johannes Kepler
Gentner, D., Brem, S. K., Ferguson, R. W., Markman, A. B., Levidow, B. B., Wolff, P., & Forbus, K. D. (1997) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0601_2 · Cited by 253
Teaching for Conceptual Change
Hewson, P. W., Beeth, M. E., & Thorley, N. (1998) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-011-4940-2_13 · Cited by 259
Building Theories in Software Engineering
Sjøberg, D. I. K., Dybå, T., Anda, B., & Hannay, J. E. (2007) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-84800-044-5_12 · Cited by 244
Citation analysis: A social and dynamic approach to knowledge organization
Hjørland, B. (2013) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2013.07.001 · Cited by 244
Mackie, G. L. (2003) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511490293 · Cited by 240
Chen, C. (2020) · Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics · doi:10.3389/frma.2020.607286 · Cited by 252
Dedre Gentner, C., & Smith, L. A. (2012) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-375000-6.00022-7 · Cited by 252
Giere, R. N., & Moffatt, B. (2003) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/03063127030332017 · Cited by 216
Explanatory Pluralism and Heuristic Identity Theory
McCauley, R. N., & Bechtel, W. (2001) · Theory & Psychology · doi:10.1177/0959354301116002 · Cited by 215
Exploratory Factor Analysis, Theory Generation, and Scientific Method
Haig, B. D. (2005) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr4003_2 · Cited by 206
Abductive Reasoning: Logic, Visual Thinking, and Coherence
Thagard, P. R., & Shelley, C. (1997) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-0487-8_22 · Cited by 198
Self-citationStructural Dynamics of Cognition: From Consistency Theories to Constraint Satisfaction
Simon, D., & Holyoak, K. J. (2002) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0604_03 · Cited by 200
Coherence, Truth, and the Development of Scientific Knowledge
Thagard, P. R. (2007) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/520941 · Cited by 197
Self-citationThe nature of science: A perspective from the philosophy of science
Eflin, J., Glennan, S. S., & Reisch, G. A. (1999) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/(sici)1098-2736(199901)36:1 · Cited by 200
Reasoning From Inconsistency to Consistency.
Johnson-Laird, P. N., Girotto, V., & Legrenzi, P. (2004) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.111.3.640 · Cited by 185
Understanding as representation manipulability
Wilkenfeld, D. A. (2011) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-011-0055-x · Cited by 181
Scientific cognition as distributed cognition
Giere, R. N. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511613517.016 · Cited by 185
Why “Conceptual Ecology” is a Good Idea
diSessa, A. A. (2006) · Kluwer Academic Publishers eBooks · doi:10.1007/0-306-47637-1_2 · Cited by 178
Zhao, E. Y., Ishihara, M., Jennings, P. D., & Lounsbury, M. D. (2018) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2017.1194 · Cited by 171
Scientific Thinking and Reasoning
Dunbar, K. N., & Klahr, D. (2012) · The Oxford Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199734689.013.0035 · Cited by 173
Multiple frameworks?: Evidence of manifold conceptions in individual cognitive structure
Taber, K. S. (2000) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/095006900289813 · Cited by 173
Yu, L., & Nickerson, J. V. (2011) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/1978942.1979147 · Cited by 173
A theoretical note on concepts and the need for Cyclic Concept Maps
SAFAYENI, F. R., Derbentseva, N., & Cañas, A. J. (2005) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.20074 · Cited by 177
Learning quanta: Barriers to stimulating transitions in student understanding of orbital ideas
Taber, K. S. (2004) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.20038 · Cited by 167
Models of Data: A Theory of How People Evaluate Data
Chinn, C. A., & Brewer, W. F. (2001) · Cognition and Instruction · doi:10.1207/s1532690xci1903_3 · Cited by 167
Beyond Constructivism: the Progressive Research Programme into Learning Science
Taber, K. S. (2006) · Studies in Science Education · doi:10.1080/03057260608560222 · Cited by 165
Clark, D. B. (2006) · Cognition and Instruction · doi:10.1207/s1532690xci2404_3 · Cited by 154
The third contender: A critical examination of the Dynamicist theory of cognition
Eliasmith, C. (1996) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515089608573194 · Cited by 148
Why wasn't O.J. convicted? Emotional coherence in legal inference
Thagard, P. R. (2003) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/0269993024400002 · Cited by 147
Self-citationMental models of the earth, sun, and moon: Indian children's cosmologies
Samarapungavan, A., Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W. F. (1996) · Cognitive Development · doi:10.1016/s0885-2014(96)90015-5 · Cited by 148
Nonintentional analogical inference in text comprehension
Day, S. B., & Gentner, D. (2007) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03195940 · Cited by 147
CAUSAL INFERENCE IN LEGAL DECISION MAKING: EXPLANATORY COHERENCE VS. BAYESIAN NETWORKS
Thagard, P. R. (2004) · Applied Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1080/08839510490279861 · Cited by 149
Self-citationChiu, M., & Lin, J. (2005) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.20062 · Cited by 148
Tytler, R. (2000) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/095006900289723 · Cited by 143
Resubsumption: A Possible Mechanism for Conceptual Change and Belief Revision
Ohlsson, S. (2009) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520802616267 · Cited by 137
CONSTRUCTIVISM AND EDUCATION: MISUNDERSTANDINGS AND PEDAGOGICAL IMPLICATIONS
Hyslop-Margison, E. J., & Ströbel, J. (2007) · The Teacher Educator · doi:10.1080/08878730701728945 · Cited by 159
Explanation in Scientists and Children
Brewer, W. F., Chinn, C. A., & Samarapungavan, A. (1998) · Minds and Machines · doi:10.1023/a:1008242619231 · Cited by 134
Inaugurating Understanding or Repackaging Explanation?
Khalifa, K. (2012) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/663235 · Cited by 140
The Interrogative Model of Inquiry and Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning
Hakkarainen, K., & Sintonen, M. (2002) · Science & Education · doi:10.1023/a:1013076706416 · Cited by 132
Vittersø, J., & Nilsen, F. (2002) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1023/a:1013831602280 · Cited by 137
A Review of Solution Chemistry Studies: Insights into Students’ Conceptions
�al�k, M., Ayas, A., & Ebenezer, J. (2005) · Journal of Science Education and Technology · doi:10.1007/s10956-005-2732-3 · Cited by 124
Vittersø, J., Biswas‐Diener, R., & Diener, E. (2005) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/s11205-004-4644-7 · Cited by 124
Picturing knowledge: historical and philosophical problems concerning the use of art in science
Baigrie, B. S. (1997) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.34-3280 · Cited by 122
Taber, K. S. (2001) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500690010006572 · Cited by 122
Kampourakis, K., & Zogza, V. (2008) · Science & Education · doi:10.1007/s11191-008-9171-5 · Cited by 119
Measuring the Intentional World
Trout, J. D. (1998) · doi:10.1093/0195107667.001.0001 · Cited by 120
Model building for conceptual change
Jonassen, D., Strobel, J., & Gottdenker, J. (2005) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820500173292 · Cited by 140
Bayesianism and Inference to the Best Explanation
Henderson, L. (2013) · The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1093/bjps/axt020 · Cited by 114
Tümay, H. (2016) · Chemistry Education Research and Practice · doi:10.1039/c6rp00008h · Cited by 112
The passionate scientist: emotion in scientific cognition
Thagard, P. R. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511613517.013 · Cited by 115
Self-citationThe Challenge of Big Data and Data Science
Brady, H. E. (2019) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-090216-023229 · Cited by 120
Step-Wise Evolution of Mental Models of Electric C ircuits: A "Learning-Aloud" Case Study
Clement, J. J., & Steinberg, M. S. (2002) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1104_1 · Cited by 111
Zembylas, M. (2005) · Studies in Science Education · doi:10.1080/03057260508560215 · Cited by 118
Simonton, D. K. (2004) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/1089-2680.8.1.59 · Cited by 107
Cooperative learning instruction for conceptual change in the concepts of chemical kinetics
Kırık, Ö. T., & Boz, Y. (2012) · Chemistry Education Research and Practice · doi:10.1039/c1rp90072b · Cited by 110
Taber, K. S. (2001) · Educational Studies · doi:10.1080/03055690120050392 · Cited by 105
The Oxford Handbook of Rationality
Rawling, P., & Mele, A. R. (2004) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195145397.001.0001 · Cited by 307
Explaining Disease: Correlations, Causes, and Mechanisms
Thagard, P. R. (1998) · Minds and Machines · doi:10.1023/a:1008286314688 · Cited by 99
Self-citationGetting to Darwin: Obstacles to Accepting Evolution by Natural Selection
Thagard, P. R., & Findlay, S. D. (2009) · Science & Education · doi:10.1007/s11191-009-9204-8 · Cited by 97
Self-citationPerspectives on Conceptual Change
(2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315045108 · Cited by 98
Consciousness, Concepts and Natural Kinds
Bayne, T., & Shea, N. J. (2020) · Philosophical Topics · doi:10.5840/philtopics20204814 · Cited by 96
AI Extenders: The Ethical and Societal Implications of Humans Cognitively Extended by AI
Hernández-Orallo, J., & Vold, K. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society · doi:10.1145/3306618.3314238 · Cited by 99
On the Role of Concepts in Learning and Instructional Design
Jonassen, D. H. (2006) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-006-8253-9 · Cited by 95
Précis ofThe creative mind: Myths and mechanisms
Boden, M. A. (1994) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x0003569x · Cited by 94
Pathways to Biomedical Discovery
Thagard, P. R. (2003) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/375465 · Cited by 93
Self-citationRapist or "Regular Guy": Explanatory Coherence in the Construction of Mental Models of Others
Read, S. J., & Miller, L. C. (1993) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167293195005 · Cited by 93
Çoştu, B., Ayas, A., & Níaz, M. (2011) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-011-9169-2 · Cited by 97
Analogy in Scientific Discovery: The Case of Johannes Kepler
Gentner, D. (2002) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-0605-8_2 · Cited by 93
Havu‐Nuutinen, S. (2005) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/0950069042000243736 · Cited by 93
Towards a Curricular Model of the Nature of Science
Taber, K. S. (2006) · Science & Education · doi:10.1007/s11191-006-9056-4 · Cited by 89
Stanovich, K. E. (2003) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511615771.011 · Cited by 90
Studying the evolution and enhancement of software features
Hsi, & Potts (2000) · Proceedings International Conference on Software Maintenance ICSM-94 · doi:10.1109/icsm.2000.883033 · Cited by 90
Software Evolution and Software Evolution Processes
Lehman, M., & Ramil, J. (2002) · Annals of Software Engineering · doi:10.1023/a:1020557525901 · Cited by 91
Taber, K. S. (2008) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500690701485082 · Cited by 88
Metadata
- Authors
- Thagard, P.
- Corresponding author
- Thagard, Paul
- ORCID
- Thagard, Paul
- Venue
- Princeton University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Princeton University Press
- Published
- 1992-12-31
- OpenAlex
- W4235165656
- Cited by
- 1,066
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 42 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 65 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 39 · 2012: 31
- FWCI
- 51.79
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Princeton University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy of Biology and Scientific Explanation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Logic and Philosophy of Science
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Diverse Historical and Scientific Studies
- Keywords
- conceptual revolutions, conceptual change, scientific revolution, philosophy of science
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review