The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Mating Systems and Strategies
Abstract
This book presents the first unified conceptual and statistical framework for understanding the evolution of reproductive strategies. Using the concept of the opportunity for sexual selection, the authors illustrate how and why sexual selection, though restricted to one sex and opposed in the other, is one of the strongest and fastest of all evolutionary forces. They offer a statistical framework for studying mating system evolution and apply it to patterns of alternative mating strategies. In doing so, they provide a method for quantifying how the strength of sexual selection is affected by the ecological and life history processes that influence females' spatial and temporal clustering and reproductive schedules. Directly challenging verbal evolutionary models that attempt to explain reproductive behavior without quantitative reference to evolutionary genetics, this book establishes a more solid theoretical foundation for the field. Among the weaknesses the authors find in the existing data is the apparent ubiquity of condition-dependent mating tactics. They identify factors likely to contribute to the evolution of alternative mating strategies--which they argue are more common than generally believed--and illustrate how to measure the strength of selection acting on them. Lastly, they offer predictions on the covariation of mating systems and strategies, consider the underlying developmental biology behind male polyphenism, and propose directions for future research. Informed by genetics, this is a comprehensive and rigorous new approach to explaining mating systems and strategies that will influence a wide swath of evolutionary biology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The evolution of social monogamy in mammals
Lukas, D., & Clutton-Brock, T. H. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1238677 · Cited by 678
Bateman's principles and human sex roles
Brown, G. R., Laland, K. N., & Mulder, M. B. (2009) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2009.02.005 · Cited by 295
Social but not genetic monogamy is associated with greater breeding success in prairie voles
Ophir, A. G., Phelps, S. M., Sorin, A. B., & Wolff, J. O. (2008) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.09.022 · Cited by 132
Conserved transcriptomic profiles underpin monogamy across vertebrates
Young, R. L., Ferkin, M. H., Ockendon-Powell, N. F., Orr, V. N., Phelps, S. M., Pogány, Á., Richards-Zawacki, C. L., Summers, K., Székely, T., Trainor, B. C., et al. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1813775116 · Cited by 93
Dubuc, C., Ruiz-Lambides, A., & Widdig, A. (2014) · Behavioral Ecology · doi:10.1093/beheco/aru052 · Cited by 76
Revisiting social recognition systems in invertebrates
Gherardi, F., Aquiloni, L., & Tricarico, E. (2012) · Animal Cognition · doi:10.1007/s10071-012-0513-y · Cited by 73
Buzatto, B. A., & Machado, G. (2008) · Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology · doi:10.1007/s00265-008-0638-9 · Cited by 72
Lambert, C. T., Sabol, A. C., & Solomon, N. G. (2018) · Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.3389/fevo.2018.00139 · Cited by 39
Rice, M. A., Restrepo, L. F., & Ophir, A. G. (2018) · Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.3389/fevo.2018.00141 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Shuster, S. M., & Wade, M. J.
- Venue
- Princeton University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Princeton University Press
- Published
- 2003-12-31
- OpenAlex
- W2243010790
- Cited by
- 1,378
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 52.25
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.