The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Game Theory for Political Scientists
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Theory of games and economic behavior
(2019) · 100 Years of Math Milestones · doi:10.1090/mbk/121/32 · Cited by 16,632
(1994) · Cited by 5,513
(2015) · Adversarial Risk Analysis · doi:10.1201/b18653-3 · Cited by 3,632
Baron, D. P., & Ferejohn, J. A. (1989) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/1961664 · Cited by 1,970
Rasmussen, E. (1989) · Cited by 547
Organization of Informative Committees by a Rational Legislature
Gilligan, T. W., & Krehbiel, K. (1990) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/2111460 · Cited by 395
Veto Threats: Rhetoric in a Bargaining Game
Matthews, S. A. (1989) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/2937851 · Cited by 217
Cited by
International Norm Dynamics and Political Change
Finnemore, M., & Sikkink, K. (1998) · International Organization · doi:10.1162/002081898550789 · Cited by 8,292
The Politics of Authoritarian Rule
Svolik, M. W. (2012) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139176040 · Cited by 2,611
Deterring Delinquents: A Rational Choice Model of Theft and Violence
Matsueda, R. L., Kreager, D. A., & Huizinga, D. (2006) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/000312240607100105 · Cited by 467
Druckman, J. N., & Lupia, A. (2000) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.3.1.1 · Cited by 292
Hall, T. H., & Ross, A. A. G. (2015) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818315000144 · Cited by 289
Metadata
- Authors
- Morrow, J. D.
- Venue
- Princeton University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Princeton University Press
- Published
- 1995-01-01
- OpenAlex
- W1483897237
- Cited by
- 786
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 21.83
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Game Theory for Political Scientists. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1515/9780691213200
- The paper
- Morrow, J. D. (1995). Game Theory for Political Scientists. Princeton University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691213200
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
