The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Intersecting Voices: Dilemmas of Gender, Political Philosophy, and Policy
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Qualitative Research and Translation Dilemmas
Temple, B., & Young, A. (2004) · Qualitative Research · doi:10.1177/1468794104044430 · Cited by 1,316
Circulating sadness: witnessing Filipina mothers' stories of family separation
Pratt, G. (2009) · Gender, Place & Culture · doi:10.1080/09663690802574753 · Cited by 151
C URRENT C ONTROVERSIES IN F EMINIST T HEORY
Dietz, M. G. (2003) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.6.121901.085635 · Cited by 145
Challenging perspectives: Reflexivity as a critical approach to qualitative social work research
Ide, Y., & Beddoe, L. (2024) · Qualitative Social Work · doi:10.1177/14733250231173522 · Cited by 177
“(Young, 1997: 48, cited in Pillow, 2003) Since assessing the self is the same self being assessed, the knower and known are in the same social and historical contexts (Yan and Wong, 2005).”
BackgroundAdcock, C. (2010) · Feminist Media Studies · doi:10.1080/14680771003672254 · Cited by 79
Metadata
- Authors
- Young, I. M.
- Venue
- Princeton University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Princeton University Press
- Published
- 1997-01-01
- OpenAlex
- W4230231838
- Cited by
- 996
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.42
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intersecting Voices: Dilemmas of Gender, Political Philosophy, and Policy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1515/9780691216355
- The paper
- Young, I. M. (1997). Intersecting Voices: Dilemmas of Gender, Political Philosophy, and Policy. Princeton University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691216355
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
