CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 38

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Centrality of Agriculture: Between Humankind and the Rest of Nature

Duncan, Colin A.M.·1996
DOI 10.1515/9780773565715
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Bridging the gap between political economy and ecology, The Centrality of Agriculture is a critical review of the history of capitalism and socialism in relation to agriculture. Colin Duncan argues that the important role of agriculture has been overlooked during the last two centuries. It must be restored to a central place in society.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/9780773565715

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Industrialization is intrinsically nonsustainable and polluting because it works on abiotic materials and needs an external agent to control its wastes, whereas soil damage directly harms agriculture.

    “industrialization is intrinsically nonsustainable and polluting, because it works on abiotic materials and needs an external agent to control its wastes, whereas soil damage directly harms agriculture (Duncan & Duncan,1996).”

    From Theories of Political Ecology: Monopoly Capital Against People and the Planet (2023) · cites this paper as Duncan & Duncan,1996

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Duncan, C. A. M.
Publisher
McGill-Queen's University Press
Published
1996-03-11
DOI
10.1515/9780773565715
Cited by
38
References
0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review