CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 399Crime, Illicit Activities, and GovernancePhilippine History and CulturePolitics and Society in Latin America

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Capital, Coercion, and Crime: Bossism in the Philippines

Sidel, John T.·1999·Stanford University Press eBooks
DOI 10.1515/9780804765473
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This book focuses on local bossism, a common political phenomenon where local power brokers achieve monopolistic control over an area's coercive and economic resources. Examples of bossism include Old Corruption in eighteenth-century England, urban political machines in the United States, caciques in Latin America, the Mafia in Southern Italy, and today's gangster politicians in such countries as India, Russia, and Thailand. For many years, the entrenchment of numerous provincial warlords and political clans has made the Philippines a striking case of local bossism. Yet writings on Filipino political culture and patron-client relations have ignored the role of coercion in shaping electoral competition and social relations. Portrayals of a "weak state" captured by a landed oligarchy have similarly neglected the enduring institutional legacies of American colonial rule and the importance of state resources for the accumulation of wealth and power in the Philippines. The author, by contrast, argues that the roots of bossism in the Philippines lie in the inauguration of formal democratic institutions at a relatively early stage of capitalist development. Poverty and insecurity leave many voters vulnerable to clientelist, coercive, and financial pressure, and the state's central role in capital accumulation provides the basis for local bosses' economic empires and political machines. These contradictions have encouraged bossism in the Philippines, as well as in other countries. The book elaborates these arguments through case studies of bosses in two Philippine provinces, Cavite and Cebu. The contrast between single-generation gangster politicians in Cavite and enduring commercial dynasties in Cebu reveals variation in the forms of bossism that reflect variations in the local political economies of the two provinces. Comparisons between bosses over successive historical periods highlight the gradual transformation of bossism through capitalist development. In sum, Capital, Coercion, and Crime provides a comparative historical analysis of bossism, drawing conclusions of great interest not only to scholars of Southeast Asia but to students of comparative politics as well.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/9780804765473

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–397 of 397

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Sidel, J. T.
Corresponding author
Sidel, John T.
Venue
Stanford University Press eBooks
Publisher
Stanford University Press
Published
1999-12-01
DOI
10.1515/9780804765473
OpenAlex
W4207053434
Cited by
399
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 6
FWCI
6.21
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Stanford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Philippine History and Culture
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Politics and Society in Latin America
Keywords
political corruption, political machines, clientelism, coercion, electoral competition, political dynasties, weak states, Cavite, Cebu, Philippines, capitalist development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review