Cited by 104Political Conflict and GovernanceAsian Studies and HistoryPolitical Theory and Democracy

Political party and party system institutionalization in Southeast Asia: lessons for democratic consolidation in Indonesia, the Philippines and Thailand

Open access
Ufen, Andreas·2008·The Pacific Review

Abstract

Is a higher degree of party and party system institutionalization positively correlated with the consolidation of democracy, defined here as the prevention of democratic breakdown? In order to answer this question, it is useful to compare different levels and types of institutionalization in three Southeast Asian electoral democracies. Institutionalized party systems are characterized, according to Mainwaring and Torcal, by ‘stability of interparty competition.’ Moreover, the distinction made by Levitsky (‘value infusion’ versus ‘behavioural routinization’) with reference to the institutionalization of individual parties will be employed. The empirical research of this paper finds that most Indonesian parties are better institutionalized than those in the Philippines and Thailand with reference to ‘value infusion.’ In addition, the interparty competition is more stable in Indonesia. Therefore, the probability of a collapse of the party system in the Philippines and Thailand is much higher. This, in turn, renders the democracies in these countries more fragile and prone to political crises or even sudden breakdowns. The early organizational consolidation of social cleavages, such as in Indonesia, enhances institutionalization. A few of the most important parties are socially rooted and have strong linkages to civil and/or religious organizations. Furthermore, the relationship between central and local elites appears to be essential: strong bosses or cliques undermine institutionalization in the Philippines and in Thailand, respectively. However, in recent years there has also been a tendency towards convergence. There are signs of regression in Indonesia, such that the future of the party system is open to question. This article calls for caution with respect to the stated causal relation between institutionalization and democratic consolidation, and it questions some aspects of the concept.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This article compares party and party system institutionalization in Indonesia, the Philippines, and Thailand and asks whether higher institutionalization supports democratic consolidation. It argues Indonesia is comparatively better institutionalized, while the Philippines and Thailand are weakly institutionalized, but concludes that the institutionalization–consolidation link is weaker and more conditional than often assumed.

Key findings

  • Indonesia shows relatively stable interparty competition and rooted parties: the paper reports continuities between 1955 and 1999 election results, and in 2004 Golkar won 21.6% and 128 seats, PDI-P 18.5% and 109 seats, PKB 10.6% and 52 seats, PPP 8.2% and 58 seats, and PD 7.5% and 57 seats. Still, it notes de-alignment, personalism, money politics, and weak platforms.
  • The Philippines is described as hardly institutionalized in stability of interparty competition: parties are founded by presidential candidates, party switching is frequent, party government is generally absent, and parties are often electoral vehicles or clientelistic networks.
  • Thailand is described as weakly institutionalized in value infusion and behavioral routinization: parties are shallowly rooted, local cliques (*phuak*) and factions matter, and Thai Rak Thai won 248 of 500 seats in 2001 and 377 in 2005 but was not well institutionalized and collapsed after the 2006 coup.
  • The paper qualifies the causal claim: the three cases cautiously support a positive correlation between better-institutionalized party systems and less fragile democracy, but institutionalization can also ossify party structures, heighten social conflict, or help sustain electoral authoritarianism and clientelism.

Methods

  • Comparative case study of Indonesia, the Philippines, and Thailand, framed by literature on party/party system institutionalization and democratic consolidation.
  • Assesses party system institutionalization mainly through “stability of interparty competition” and individual party institutionalization through Levitsky’s “value infusion” and “behavioral routinization,” rather than fragmentation or electoral volatility.
  • Uses secondary literature, election tables, and cited survey evidence; no original large-N statistical analysis is presented.

Limitations

  • Stated: the causal mechanism linking institutionalization and democratic consolidation is weaker than often assumed; the impact of formal institutions is difficult to assess and should not be overestimated; the Indonesian pattern may change in the long run.
  • Stated: electoral volatility is a weak indicator in these cases because of party switching in the Philippines and factional politics in Thailand.
  • Evident from the text: the study is a qualitative three-case comparison relying heavily on secondary sources, with limited generalizability and a temporal focus ending around the 2007–2008 period.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09512740802134174

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 41 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingcitation

    The first direct elections of regional heads (pilkada), started in 2005, have weakened local and regional party leaders in comparison to the candidates, because many candidates did not have a strong party background but were chosen among independent civil servants or businessmen.

    “Furthermore, the first direct elections of regional heads (governors, district chiefs and mayors), the pilkada, which started in 2005, have weakened local and regional party leaders in comparison to the candidates, because many of the latter did not have a strong party background but were chosen among independent civil servants or businessmen (Mietzner 2008;Rinakit 2005).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Mietzner 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Rinakit 2005

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Findingcitation

    Golkar is more a clientelist machine than a platform-based 'classical' party.

    “Golkar, in the New Order period the ruling party and an assemblage of so-called functional groups, is more a clientelist machine than a platform-based 'classical' party (Tomsa 2006).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Tomsa 2006

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Findingreasoning

    Factionalization is a recurrent problem in Indonesian parties.

    “After 1998, parties are more dominated by charismatic leaders, and factionalization is a recurrent problem.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingnone given

    Even in terms of behavioral routinization, Indonesian parties' track record is better than that of their counterparts in the other two countries.

    “Even in terms of behavioral routinization, their track record is better than that of their counterparts in the other two countries.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingnone given

    Many Indonesian parties are rooted in social milieus.

    “Many parties are rooted in social milieus.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 30
  • May combine two claims. 50
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    The Megawati government (2001-04) had a dubious track record because military reforms were delayed and the heavy-handed policy on regions such as Aceh and Papua even intensified.

    “The Megawati government (2001-04) had a dubious track record because military reforms were delayed and the heavy-handed policy on regions such as Aceh and Papua even intensified.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Regulations on how to conduct party congresses in Indonesia are usually unclear and are prone to manipulation.

    “Usually, regulations on how to conduct party congresses are unclear and are prone to manipulation (Notosusanto 2005).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Notosusanto 2005

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    In Thailand, the party system has collapsed just recently.

    “In Thailand, the party system has collapsed just recently.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    In the Philippines, the post-1986 system is not reminiscent of that of the pre-Marcos period and has shifted continuously.

    “In the Philippines, the post-1986 system is not reminiscent of that of the pre-Marcos period and has shifted continuously.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Membership fees are mostly insignificant in Indonesian parties, as is public funding.

    “Membership fees are mostly insignificant, as is public funding.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    There is an evident continuity among Indonesian party alternatives reaching back to the 1950s.

    “There is an evident continuity among party alternatives reaching back to the 1950s.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingnone given

    The financing of parties in Indonesia is dubious: many rely for campaigning on unknown financiers, and regulations to control these external cash flows are seldom enforced.

    “The financing of parties in general is dubious: many of them rely for campaigning on unknown financiers, and regulations to control these external cash flows are seldom enforced.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    The PDI-P has lost most of its reform vigour.

    “The PDI-P, banned as the only real opposition party (then as the PDI) in the last years of the New Order, has lost most of its reform vigour.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    'Money politics' with bought candidacies, MPs acting as brokers for private companies, businessmen taking over party chairmanships, and billionaire financiers determining policies behind the scenes are far more pronounced today in Indonesia.

    “'Money politics' with bought candidacies, MPs acting as brokers for private companies, businessmen taking over party chairmanships, and billionaire financiers determining policies behind the scenes are far more pronounced today.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Most Indonesian parties are socially rooted and better linked to different kinds of civil society and religious organizations.

    “As to the institutionalization of individual parties, most Indonesian parties are socially rooted and better linked to different kinds of civil society and religious organizations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    Intraparty authoritarianism and personalism is obvious in Indonesian parties.

    “Intraparty authoritarianism and personalism is obvious.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    In recent years some businessmen have become party chiefs in Indonesia, for example Yusuf Kalla (Golkar) and Sutrisno Bachir (PAN).

    “In recent years some businessmen have even become party chiefs, for example Yusuf Kalla (Golkar) and Sutrisno Bachir (PAN).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    A fair degree of party and party system institutionalization has been achieved in Indonesia, where the party system is characterized by clearly visible cleavages.

    “Nonetheless, a fair degree of party and party system institutionalization has been achieved in Indonesia, where the party system is characterized by clearly visible cleavages.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Almost all Indonesian parties have their power center in Jakarta and chastise recalcitrant members, including by recalling parliamentarians.

    “Almost all parties have their power center in Jakarta and chastise recalcitrant members.One means of doing so is recalling parliamentarians, that is, terminating their mandate and replacing them.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Indonesian parties cooperate in grand coalitions, avoid the formation of an organized opposition and collude in tolerating corruption.

    “Parties cooperate in grand coalitions, avoid the formation of an organized opposition and collude in tolerating corruption.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Partai Demokrat is almost completely dependent on Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono and was set up as a vehicle for the first direct presidential elections.

    “The Partai Demokrat (Democrat Party), for instance, which is almost completely dependent on Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono, was set up as a vehicle for the first direct presidential elections.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    In Indonesia, the spread of mass education and the mass media together with the globalization of Islam have weakened the old religious establishment and elevated new Muslim leaders, many of whom are without a deep religious knowledge.

    “In Indonesia, the spread of mass education and the mass media together with the globalization of Islam have weakened the old religious establishment and elevated new Muslim leaders, many of whom are without a deep religious knowledge.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    In Thailand, strong local elites arose in the 1980s, along with the establishment of a semidemocracy with competitive elections.

    “In Thailand, strong local elites arose in the 1980s, along with the establishment of a semidemocracy with competitive elections.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Thai local elites dominated multi-member constituencies and were thus able to take control of factions, parties, and ministries in Bangkok in fluid coalition governments.

    “The local elites dominated multi-member constituencies and were thus able to take control of factions, parties, and ministries in Bangkok in fluid coalition governments (Sidel 1999: 150f.).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Sidel 1999: 150f. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Family clans still dominate the Philippine political landscape, but now they have begun to compete with celebrities and professionals.

    “The family clans still dominate the political landscape, but now they have begun to compete with celebrities and professionals.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    Ethnic Chinese and indigenous businessmen arose as a powerful class in the New Order and are now increasingly able to influence political parties in Indonesia.

    “They arose as a powerful class in the New Order and are now increasingly able to influence political parties.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    In Thailand, the TRT was the direct offshoot of Thaksin's media empire.

    “In Thailand, the TRT was the direct offshoot of Thaksin's media empire.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    In contrast to the Philippines, Thai local elites emerged relatively late and in a parliamentary system with a centralized bureaucracy where local executive powers are wielded by civilian bureaucrats.

    “In contrast to the Philippines, these elites emerged relatively late and in a parliamentary system with a centralized bureaucracy where local executive powers are wielded by civilian bureaucrats.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    In Thailand, the national elite were able to retain their power unimpeded by colonial rulers so that the ensuing 'bureaucratic polity' would, for a long time, stave off extra-bureaucratic forces such as political parties.

    “In Thailand, the national elite were able to retain their power unimpeded by colonial rulers so that the ensuing 'bureaucratic polity' would, for a long time, stave off extra-bureaucratic forces such as political parties.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    These highly politicized, mostly anti-colonial, nationalist organizations were socially entrenched and capable of mobilizing large parts of the population.

    “These highly politicized, mostly anti-colonial, nationalist organizations were socially entrenched and capable of mobilizing large parts of the population.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    This domination by capital is still not fully developed in Indonesia, whereas it has been typical in the Philippines from the beginning and in Thailand at least since the 1980s.

    “This domination is still not fully developed, whereas it has been typical in the Philippines from the beginning and in Thailand at least since the 1980s.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    Indonesian parliamentarians have a much weaker power base than in the Philippines and Thailand, where congressmen and MPs are elected directly with a majority system.

    “Indonesian parliamentarians have a much weaker power base than in the Philippines and Thailand, where congressmen and MPs are elected directly with a majority system.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    So far, patterns of party competition in Indonesia have manifested regularly and the voter-party linkage has been quite strong.

    “So far, patterns of party competition have manifested regularly and the voter-party linkage has been quite strong.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Indonesia is an exception in that the patterns of competition are relatively regular and a few of the large parties are to a certain extent still rooted in society.

    “Indonesia is an exception in that the patterns of competition are relatively regular and a few of the large parties are to a certain extent still rooted in society.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    In Thailand, the most recent Freedom House ratings for political rights declined from 3 to 7 and those for civil liberties from 3 to 4.

    “In Thailand, the most recent Freedom House ratings for political rights declined from 3 to 7 and those for civil liberties from 3 to 4.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Thaksin was toppled after he had easily overwhelmed a range of clientelist parties and had begun to destroy core institutions of the electoral democracy.

    “Thaksin was toppled after he had easily overwhelmed a range of clientelist parties and had begun to destroy core institutions of the electoral democracy.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    One of the best-rooted parties in Indonesia today has a dubious past and is prone to defend the privileges of New Order elites (Golkar); another demonstrates a shallow commitment to the multi-religious compromise enshrined in the constitution (PKS).

    “One of the best-rooted parties in Indonesia today has a dubious past and is prone to de-fend the privileges of New Order elites (Golkar); another demonstrates a shallow commitment to the multi-religious compromise enshrined in the constitution (PKS).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    In the Philippines, politics is determined by fights among clans and is, thus, extremely unpredictable.

    “In the Philippines, politics is determined by fights among clans and is, thus, extremely unpredictable.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Many of the big parties in Indonesia are rooted, have substantial linkages to civil and religious organizations and are reified in the public mind.

    “Many of the big parties in Indonesia are rooted, have substantial linkages to civil and religious organizations and are reified in the public mind.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The three countries, Indonesia, the Philippines and Thailand, are comparable cases for assessing the relationship between party and party system institutionalization and democratic consolidation.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The largest political parties in the Philippines today are still characterized by a lack of meaningful platforms, by a high frequency of party switching and factionalism, as well as by numerous dissolutions and re-emergences.

    “The largest political parties in the Philippines today are still characterized by a lack of meaningful platforms, by a high frequency of party switching and factionalism, as well as by numerous dissolutions and re-emergences”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Arlegue and Coronel 2003

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Rocamora 2000

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Teehankee 2006

      Not checked in the free run.

    • Rests on an assumption: The three countries, Indonesia, the Philippines and Thailand, are comparable cases for assessing the relationship between party and party system institutionalization and democratic consolidation.
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    It is generally assumed that parties fulfil their usual functions better when they and the party system as a whole are well-institutionalized and that a higher degree of institutionalization is positively correlated with the consolidation of democracy.

    “It is generally assumed that parties fulfil their usual functions better when they and the party system as a whole are well-institutionalized and that a higher degree of institutionalization is positively correlated with the consolidation of democracy”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Mainwaring and Torcal 2006 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Randall and Sva˚ sand 2002

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Well-functioning political parties are essential for recruiting political elites, organizing opposition, resolving conflict by establishing channels of representation, providing accountability, and aggregating interests.

    “well-functioning political parties are essential for recruiting political elites, organizing opposition, resolving conflict by establishing channels of representation, providing accountability, and aggregating interests.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Lindberg 2007

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Lai and Melkonian-Hoover 2005

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The vacuum of deinstitutionalized party systems is filled by pluto populism, not Peronist populism; organized labour is eschewed.

    “The vacuum of deinstitutionalized party systems is filled by 'pluto' populism (Phongpaichit and Baker 2002;Thompson 2007), not Peronist populism; that is, organized labour is eschewed.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Phongpaichit and Baker 2002

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Thompson 2007

      Not checked in the free run.

    • Rests on an assumption: The three countries, Indonesia, the Philippines and Thailand, are comparable cases for assessing the relationship between party and party system institutionalization and democratic consolidation.
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Weakly institutionalized party systems generate more uncertainty in electoral outcomes and are inimical to electoral accountability.

    “Weakly institutionalized party systems generate more uncertainty in electoral outcomes and are inimical to electoral accountability.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Mainwaring and Torcal 2006 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    In the Philippines, politicians repeatedly switch from one party to another, making it impossible to measure total electoral volatility.

    “In the Philippines, politicians repeatedly switch from one party to another, making it impossible to measure total electoral volatility”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Croissant 2006

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    In Indonesia, a shift from one Islamic party to another may indicate a very moderate volatility in terms of identification with certain ideologies or policies.

    “In Indonesia, for instance, a shift from one Islamic party to another may indicate a very moderate volatility in terms of identification with certain ideologies or policies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A relatively stable party system fosters more effective programmatic representation, party labels provide better programmatic cues, and electoral volatility usually decreases and provides considerable structure to democratic politics.

    “A relatively stable party system fosters more effective programmatic representation, party labels provide better programmatic cues, and electoral volatility usually decreases and 'provides considerable structure to democratic politics'”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Mainwaring and Zoco 2007

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Because of a general devaluation of ideologies, political platforms in Indonesia are generally poor.

    “Because of a general devaluation of ideologies, political platforms are generally poor.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    These linkages provide a comparatively strong infusion of values and foster, in spite of recent counter-tendencies, a fair routinization.

    “These linkages provide a comparatively strong infusion of values and foster, in spite of recent counter-tendencies, a fair routinization.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    More institutionalized party systems are more stable; patterns of party competition manifest more regularly.

    “More institutionalized systems, according to them, are more stable; that is, patterns of party competition manifest more regularly.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Mainwaring and Torcal 2006 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    The political systems of Thailand, the Philippines and Indonesia are defined as electoral democracies or polyarchies.

    “In this article, the political systems of Thailand, the Philip-pines and Indonesia are defined as electoral democracies or polyarchies, which is essentially the same.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Dahl 1989

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Other reasons for the hampering of party institutionalization in the three countries are eroding traditional relationships and the rise of the mass media.

    “Other reasons for the hampering of party institutionalization in the three countries are eroding traditional relationships and the rise of the mass media.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The multipartyism in Indonesia is not simply the result of but also at least as much the cause of the proportional system.

    “The multipartyism in Indonesia, for example, is not simply the result of but also at least as much the cause of the proportional system.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Institutionalization is hampered in Thailand and the Philippines by the existence of highly influential local and regional elites, whereas in Indonesia strong countervailing civil society forces alleviate local strongmen rule.

    “Institutionalization is hampered in Thailand and the Philippines by the existence of highly influential local and regional elites, whereas in Indonesia strong countervailing civil society forces alleviate local strongmen rule (Sidel 2004).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Sidel 2004

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Rüland et al. state that the party system reflected in the legislature 'is primarily an expression of the extent to which societal cleavages are transformed into political parties but also of the electoral system,' whereas in most cases there is no clear causal link between the system of government and party cohesion.

    “Rüland et al. (2005: 271) state that the party system reflected in the legislature 'is primarily an expression of the extent to which societal cleavages are transformed into political parties but also of the electoral system,' whereas in most cases there is no clear causal link between the system of government and party cohesion.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Rüland et al. 2005: 271 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Although Thaksin was able to hold sway over these local elites, party system institutionalization was blocked by a de facto one-party rule.

    “Although Thaksin was able to hold sway over these local elites, party system institutionalization was blocked by a de facto one-party rule.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    For Sidel, the emergence of bosses is essentially dependent on a specific sequencing, that is, the imposition of formal electoral democratic institutions upon an underdeveloped state apparatus at an early phase of capitalist development.

    “For Sidel, the emergence of bosses is essentially dependent on a specific sequencing, that is, the imposition of formal electoral democratic institutions upon an underdeveloped state apparatus at an early phase of capitalist development (Sidel 1999: 13).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Sidel 1999: 13 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Reasons for weak local elites in Indonesia include the early mobilization and translation of cleavages into the party system, the heritage of New Order centralism, and the lack of a strong locally based bourgeoisie.

    “Reasons for this, besides the above-mentioned early mobilization and translation of cleavages into the party system, are the heritage of New Order centralism and, particularly, the lack of a strong locally based bourgeoisie.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    According to neo-institutionalists, institutions are endogenous; that is, 'their form and their functioning depend on the conditions under which they emerge and endure'.

    “According to neo-institutionalists, institutions are endogenous; that is, 'their form and their functioning depend on the conditions under which they emerge and endure' (Przeworski 2004: 527).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Przeworski 2004: 527

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    According to Manacsa, in the Philippines after 1986 political parties and the party system have changed inter alia because of the weakening of traditional patron-client bonds as well as the rise of powerful TV newscasters and entertainment stars.

    “According to Manacsa (1999: 202ff.), in the Philippines after 1986 political parties and the party system have changed inter alia because of the weakening of traditional patron-client bonds as well as the rise of powerful TV newscasters and entertainment stars.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Manacsa 1999: 202ff.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Mainwaring has stated that greater institutionalization is not always better because it may lead to the ossification of party structures.

    “Mainwaring (1997) has stated that greater institutionalization is not always better because it may lead to the ossification of party structures.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Mainwaring 1997

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Schedler warns against the confusion of the consolidation of 'partial regimes' with that of democracy as a whole, for 'a democracy may be secure against reversals even if its party system is still inchoate and fluid; and conversely, a democracy may break down even if its party system is highly institutionalized.'

    “In this vein, Schedler (2001: 161) warns against the confusion of the consolidation of 'partial regimes' with that of democracy as a whole, for 'a democracy may be secure against reversals even if its party system is still inchoate and fluid; and conversely, a democracy may break down even if its party system is highly institutionalized.'”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Schedler 2001: 161

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    This may change in the long run, because some of the patterns buttressing political parties in Indonesia are increasingly being undermined.

    “But, again, this may change in the long run, because some of the patterns buttressing political parties in Indonesia are increasingly being undermined.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    This is contingent upon the power of local elites, the impact of huge entrepreneurs on party activities, and formal institutional factors, although the latter should not be overestimated.

    “This, again, is contingent upon the power of local elites, the impact of huge entrepreneurs on party activities, and formal institutional factors, although the latter should not be overestimated.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Johnson Tan rightly notes that the rootedness of Indonesian parties at times even heightens social conflicts.

    “In like manner, Johnson Tan (2006) rightly notes that the rootedness of Indonesian parties at times even heightens social conflicts.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Johnson Tan 2006

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    If one looks at the whole political system, a low number of veto actors and, particularly, a military controlled by civil authorities are beneficial.

    “If one looks at the whole political system, a low number of veto actors and, particularly, a military controlled by civil authorities are beneficial.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Brownlee has observed that parties often play a vital role in facilitating the maintenance of electoral authoritarian regimes.

    “And Brownlee (2007: 218f.) has observed that parties often play a vital role in facilitating the maintenance of electoral authoritarian regimes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Brownlee 2007: 218f. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The probability that a better-institutionalized party system is positively correlated with a less-fragile democratic regime is high, and the three test cases support the hypothesis.

    “The probability that a better-institutionalized party system is positively correlated with a less-fragile democratic regime is high, and the three test cases support the hypothesis.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The three countries (Indonesia, the Philippines, Thailand) are comparable cases for testing the relationship between party system institutionalization and democratic consolidation.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The direct election of regional heads in Indonesia since 2005 may, in the long run, change at least the standing of local elites.

    “The direct election of regional heads in Indonesia since 2005 may, in the long run, change at least the standing of local elites.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    If other 'partial regimes' are included in the analysis, it is probable that a consolidated rechtsstaat, an advantageous social structure, the absence of political violence and fierce class struggle, and an efficient and uncorrupted state administration all buttress directly or indirectly the democraticness of political parties and the party system.

    “And if other 'partial regimes' are included in the analysis, it is probable that a consolidated rechtsstaat, an advantageous social structure, the absence of political violence and fierce class struggle, and an efficient and uncorrupted state administration all buttress directly or indirectly the democraticness of political parties and the party system.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
65 of 65
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Political parties are an important link between civil society and state.

    “Political parties are an important link between civil society and state.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The three countries, Indonesia, the Philippines and Thailand, are comparable cases for assessing the relationship between party and party system institutionalization and democratic consolidation.

    “The second part deals with the most salient characteristics of parties and party systems in Indonesia, the Philippines and Thailand with reference to 'stability of interparty competition' and 'value infusion and behavioral routinization.'”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The Freedom House ratings for political rights and civil liberties are valid indicators of a country's level of democracy.

    “Indonesia is now arguably, with reference to the Freedom House ratings for political rights and civil liberties, the most democratic country in Southeast Asia.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The three countries (Indonesia, the Philippines, Thailand) are comparable cases for testing the relationship between party system institutionalization and democratic consolidation.

    “The probability that a better-institutionalized party system is positively correlated with a less-fragile democratic regime is high, and the three test cases support the hypothesis.”
4 of 4

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Party institutionalization channels interests of social groups, promotes actors and attitudes supportive of democracy, and facilitates credible commitments.

    “Party institutionalization is highlighted as a means for channeling the interests of social groups, promoting actors and attitudes supportive of democracy, and facilitating credible commitments (e.g., Mainwaring and Torcal 2006; Ufen 2008; Lewis 2006).”

    From Parties, Civil Society, and the Deterrence of Democratic Defection (2020) · cites this paper as Ufen 2008

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says parties aggregate interests, establish channels of representation, recruit political elites, and solidify democratic norms. The section “Institutionalization of parties and party systems” adds that well-institutionalized parties generally perform these functions better. Neither passage establishes the claimed role in facilitating credible commitments, and the Conclusion cautions that institutionalization does not necessarily consolidate democracy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Arlegue C., 2003, Political Parties in Asia: Promoting Reform and Combating Corruption in Eight Countries, 217
  2. Bünte M., 2000, Probleme der demokratischen Konsolidierung in Thailand [Problems of Democratic Consolidation in Thailand]
  3. Croissant A., 2006, Between Consolidation and Crisis: Elections and Democracy in Five Nations in Southeast Asia, 329
  4. Hicken A., 2006, Taiwan Journal of Democracy, 2, 23
  5. 2007, Peta Partai Politik Oktober 2007 [Map of Political Parties in October 2007]
  6. Mainwaring S., 1997, The Global Divergence of Democracies, 185
  7. Manacsa R. C., 1999, Ateneo de Manila University Department of Political Science (ed.) Politics and Governance: Theory and Praxis, 159
  8. Nelson M., 2001, Thailand's New Politics: KPI Yearbook 2001, 283
  9. Notosusanto S., 2005, Analisa AD/ART Partai Politik [Analysis of Political Parties' Statutes]
  10. O'Donnell G. A., 2002, The Global Divergence of Democracies, 113
  11. Sherlock S., 2005, The Role of Political Parties in a Second Wave of Reformasi
  12. Sidel J. T., 2004, Politicising Democracy: The New Local Politics of Democratisation, 51
  13. Teehankee J., 2006, Between Consolidation and Crisis: Elections and Democracy in Five Nations in Southeast Asia, 215
  14. Thompson M. R., 2007, Globality Studies Journal
  15. Thornton L. L., 2003, Political Parties in Asia: Promoting Reform and Combating Corruption in Eight Countries, 371

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ufen, A.
Affiliations
German Institute for Global and Area Studies (DE)
Corresponding author
Ufen, Andreas
Venue
The Pacific Review
Published
2008-07-04
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
327-350
ISSN
  • 0951-2748 (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-1332
OpenAlex
W1996484446
Cited by
104
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
9.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Pacific Review (publishedVersion)
  • Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Asian Studies and History
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
Keywords
party institutionalization, party system institutionalization, democratic consolidation, inter-party competition, party system collapse, social cleavages, party elites, Indonesia, Philippines, Thailand, Southeast Asia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review