Formal Organizations: A Comparative Approach
Abstract
Upon its publication in 1962, this book became one of the founding texts of organizational sociology. Bringing together diverse approaches, it presented a new focus of interest: the formal organization. Blau and Scott raised the level of analysis from attention solely on individual participants and work groups to a broader understanding of organizations as collective actors. In the book, the authors reviewed multiple types of studies—including case studies, experimental research, and surveys—and integrated them to define new central themes. They used their own empirical studies of two social welfare agencies to illustrate the ways in which varying organizational contexts shape work group and participant attitudes and activities. Formal Organizations served to integrate research on both formal and informal systems, authority and leadership, and stressed the importance of links to the wider environment. This reissue, which includes a new introduction by Scott, makes this seminal work accessible to a new generation of scholars and practitioners.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Weber's conception spurred a rich tradition of comparative organizational analyses of patterns of bureaucracy and typologies conceiving types of organizations as clusters of attributes.
“which spurned a rich tradition of comparative organizational analyses of 'patterns' of bureaucracy (Gouldner, 1954) and typologies conceiving 'types' of organizations as clusters of attributes (e.g., Blau & Scott, 1962; Etzioni, 1961).”
From Embracing Causal Complexity: The Emergence of a Neo-Configurational Perspective (2017) · cites this paper as Blau & Scott, 1962
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Building Better Causal Theories: A Fuzzy Set Approach to Typologies in Organization Research
Fiss, P. C. (2011) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2011.60263120 · Cited by 5,930 · see citing works
8 Social Hierarchy: The Self‐Reinforcing Nature of Power and Status
Magee, J. C., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520802211628 · Cited by 2,385 · see citing works
Embracing Causal Complexity: The Emergence of a Neo-Configurational Perspective
Misangyi, V. F., Greckhamer, T., Furnari, S., Fiss, P. C., Crilly, D., & Aguilera, R. (2017) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206316679252 · Cited by 1,099 · see citing works
The organizational climate of middle schools: The development and test of the OCDQ‐RM
Hoy, W. K., Hoffman, J., Sabo, D., & Bliss, J. (1996) · Journal of Educational Administration · doi:10.1108/09578239610107156 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
A Framework of Strategic Approaches to Membership Growth in Nonprofit Community Sport
Morrison, K. A., & Misener, K. E. (2022) · Journal of Sport Management · doi:10.1123/jsm.2021-0066 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
- Authors
- Blau, P. M., & Scott, W. R.
- Venue
- Stanford University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Stanford University Press
- Published
- 1962-01-01
- OpenAlex
- W4298356175
- Cited by
- 1,111
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 33
- FWCI
- 20.67
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Stanford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management Theory and Practice
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice
- Keywords
- formal organizations, sociology of organizations, collective action, authority, leadership, work teams, social welfare agencies, organizational context, informal systems
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review