Cited by 16Indian and Buddhist StudiesLibrary Science and Information SystemsLibraries, Manuscripts, and Books

The Evaluation of Indigenous Scriptures in Chinese Buddhist Bibliographical Catalogues

Tokuno, Kyoko·1990·Chinese Buddhist Apocrypha

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/9780824842611-004

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Old catalogues show Chinese authors deliberately separating Chinese-authored texts and marking them as inauthentic.

    “Indeed, the ancient bibliographies show us Chinese authors taking pains to segregate Chinese-authored texts and label them as inauthentic”
  • Scholarship on Chinese Buddhist bibliographies firmly maintains that Chinese Buddhists regarded Indian origin as the essential criterion of authenticity.

    “This is a surprising conclusion given that the literature on Chinese Buddhist bibliographies unequivocally insists that an Indian origin was the sine qua non of authenticity amongst Chinese Buddhists themselves.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tokuno, K.
Corresponding author
Tokuno, Kyoko
Venue
Chinese Buddhist Apocrypha
Published
1990-12-31
Pages
31-74
OpenAlex
W4293145091
Cited by
16
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
University of Hawaii Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Library Science and Information Systems
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Libraries, Manuscripts, and Books
Keywords
Buddhist scriptures, Chinese Buddhism, Buddhist manuscripts, textual transmission

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review