Cited by 7Asian American and Pacific HistoriesFood, Nutrition, and Cultural PracticesPacific and Southeast Asian Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Path to Perdition: The Wholesome Roots and Their Eradication

Buswell Jr., Robert E.·1992·Paths to Liberation

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/9780824890667-006

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Vibhāṣā defines the extirpation of wholesome roots as the temporary allayment (asamanvāgama) of the kuśalamūlas due to the overriding force of perverted views (mithyādṛṣṭi).

    “As Robert E. Buswell puts it, the Vibhāṣā defines the extirpation of wholesome roots in the sense of 'temporary allayment ( asamanvāgama ) of the kuśalamūla s due to the overriding force of perverted views ( mithyādṛṣṭi ).'38”

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Metadata

Authors
Buswell Jr., R. E.
Venue
Paths to Liberation
Published
1992-12-31
Pages
107-134
OpenAlex
W4300544076
Cited by
5
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
University of Hawaii Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Asian American and Pacific Histories
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Food, Nutrition, and Cultural Practices
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies
Keywords
eradication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review