The DOI matches its Crossref record.
After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy
Abstract
This book is a comprehensive study of cooperation among the advanced capitalist countries. Can cooperation persist without the dominance of a single power, such as the United States after World War II? To answer this pressing question, Robert Keohane analyzes the institutions, or "international regimes," through which cooperation has taken place in the world political economy and describes the evolution of these regimes as American hegemony has eroded. Refuting the idea that the decline of hegemony makes cooperation impossible, he views international regimes not as weak substitutes for world government but as devices for facilitating decentralized cooperation among egoistic actors. In the preface the author addresses the issue of cooperation after the end of the Soviet empire and with the renewed dominance of the United States, in security matters, as well as recent scholarship on cooperation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Toward a General Theory of Strategic Action Fields
Fligstein, N., & McAdam, D. (2011) · Sociological Theory · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9558.2010.01385.x · Cited by 1,367
The Nuclear Taboo: The United States and the Normative Basis of Nuclear Non-Use
Tannenwald, N. (1999) · International Organization · doi:10.1162/002081899550959 · Cited by 782
The Autocratic Welfare State: Old-Age Pensions, Credible Commitments, and Regime Survival
Knutsen, C. H., & Rasmussen, M. (2018) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414017710265 · Cited by 146
The Disclosure Dilemma: Nuclear Intelligence and International Organizations
Carnegie, A., & Carson, A. (2019) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12426 · Cited by 105
“The persistent myth of lost hegemony,” revisited: structural power as a complex network phenomenon
Winecoff, W. K. (2020) · European Journal of International Relations · doi:10.1177/1354066120952876 · Cited by 89
Beck, M. (2020) · Global Policy · doi:10.1111/1758-5899.12778 · Cited by 35
States and Markets: An Ecofeminist Perspective on International Political Economy
Tickner, J. A. (1993) · International Political Science Review · doi:10.1177/019251219301400104 · Cited by 18
Investigating global mental health: contributions from political science
Patterson, A. S., Boadu, N. Y., Clark, M., Janes, C., Monteiro, N., Roberts, J. H., Shiffman, J., Thomas, D., & Wipfli, H. (2020) · Global Public Health · doi:10.1080/17441692.2020.1724315 · Cited by 15
Gastinger, M., & Dür, A. (2026) · Review of International Political Economy · doi:10.1080/09692290.2026.2656366 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Venue
- Princeton University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Princeton University Press
- Published
- 1984-12-31
- OpenAlex
- W4237897854
- Cited by
- 1,113
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 25.46
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
