The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Poverty Knowledge: Social Science, Social Policy, and the Poor in Twentieth-Century U.S. History
Abstract
Progressive-era "poverty warriors" cast poverty in America as a problem of unemployment, low wages, labor exploitation, and political disfranchisement. In the 1990s, policy specialists made "dependency" the issue and crafted incentives to get people off welfare. Poverty Knowledge gives the first comprehensive historical account of the thinking behind these very different views of "the poverty problem," in a century-spanning inquiry into the politics, institutions, ideologies, and social science that shaped poverty research and policy. Alice O'Connor chronicles a transformation in the study of poverty, from a reform-minded inquiry into the political economy of industrial capitalism to a detached, highly technical analysis of the demographic and behavioral characteristics of the poor. Along the way, she uncovers the origins of several controversial concepts, including the "culture of poverty" and the "underclass." She shows how such notions emerged not only from trends within the social sciences, but from the central preoccupations of twentieth-century American liberalism: economic growth, the Cold War against communism, the changing fortunes of the welfare state, and the enduring racial divide. The book details important changes in the politics and organization as well as the substance of poverty knowledge. Tracing the genesis of a still-thriving poverty research industry from its roots in the War on Poverty, it demonstrates how research agendas were subsequently influenced by an emerging obsession with welfare reform. Over the course of the twentieth century, O'Connor shows, the study of poverty became more about altering individual behavior and less about addressing structural inequality. The consequences of this steady narrowing of focus came to the fore in the 1990s, when the nation's leading poverty experts helped to end "welfare as we know it." O'Connor shows just how far they had traveled from their field's original aims.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Think Tanks, Public Policy, and the Politics of Expertise
Rich, A. (2004) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511509889 · Cited by 499
Poverty, Inequality, and Discrimination as Sources of Depression Among U.S. Women
Belle, D., & Doucet, J. (2003) · Psychology of Women Quarterly · doi:10.1111/1471-6402.00090 · Cited by 440
Childhood Adultification in Economically Disadvantaged Families: A Conceptual Model
Burton, L. (2007) · Family Relations · doi:10.1111/j.1741-3729.2007.00463.x · Cited by 438
Krieger, N., Waterman, P. D., Spasojevic, J., Li, W., Maduro, G., & Van Wye, G. (2016) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2015.302955 · Cited by 432
More Than Words? Delving Into the Substantive Meaning(s) of “Social Justice” in Education
North, C. E. (2006) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543076004507 · Cited by 373
Metadata
- Authors
- O’Connor, A.
- Venue
- Princeton University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Princeton University Press
- Published
- 2001-12-31
- OpenAlex
- W4245329754
- Cited by
- 527
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.32
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Poverty Knowledge: Social Science, Social Policy, and the Poor in Twentieth-Century U.S. History. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1515/9781400824748
- The paper
- O’Connor, A. (2001). Poverty Knowledge: Social Science, Social Policy, and the Poor in Twentieth-Century U.S. History. Princeton University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400824748
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.