Normal Accidents: Living with High Risk Technologies - Updated Edition

Perrow, Charles·2000·Princeton University Press eBooks

DOI 10.1515/9781400828494

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/9781400828494

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The Path to European Integration: A Historical Institutionalist Analysis
PIERSON, P. (1996) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414096029002001 · Cited by 1,634
Bridging the Gap Between Ethics and Practice: Guidelines for Reliable, Safe, and Trustworthy Human-centered AI Systems
Shneiderman, B. (2020) · ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1145/3419764 · Cited by 768
Organizational Learning Under Fire: Theory and Practice
CARLEY, K. M., & HARRALD, J. R. (1997) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/0002764297040003007 · Cited by 125
A Fate Worse Than Warming? Stratospheric Aerosol Injection and Global Catastrophic Risk
Tang, A., & Kemp, L. (2021) · Frontiers in Climate · doi:10.3389/fclim.2021.720312 · Cited by 58
Smart Cities: Buggy and Brittle
Townsend, A. (2013) · Places Journal · doi:10.22269/131007 · Cited by 12

Authors: Perrow, C.
Venue: Princeton University Press eBooks
Publisher: Princeton University Press
Published: 2000-01-01
DOI: 10.1515/9781400828494
OpenAlex: W4236282325
Cited by: 456
References: 0
FWCI: 10.25
Type: book
Language: en
Open access: closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review