The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Game Theory for Applied Economists
Abstract
This book introduces one of the most powerful tools of modern economics to a wide audience: those who will later construct or consume game-theoretic models. Robert Gibbons addresses scholars in applied fields within economics who want a serious and thorough discussion of game theory but who may have found other works overly abstract. Gibbons emphasizes the economic applications of the theory at least as much as the pure theory itself; formal arguments about abstract games play a minor role. The applications illustrate the process of model building--of translating an informal description of a multi-person decision situation into a formal game-theoretic problem to be analyzed. Also, the variety of applications shows that similar issues arise in different areas of economics, and that the same game-theoretic tools can be applied in each setting. In order to emphasize the broad potential scope of the theory, conventional applications from industrial organization have been largely replaced by applications from labor, macro, and other applied fields in economics. The book covers four classes of games, and four corresponding notions of equilibrium: static games of complete information and Nash equilibrium, dynamic games of complete information and subgame-perfect Nash equilibrium, static games of incomplete information and Bayesian Nash equilibrium, and dynamic games of incomplete information and perfect Bayesian equilibrium.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Social Skill and the Theory of Fields
Fligstein, N. (2001) · Sociological Theory · doi:10.1111/0735-2751.00132 · Cited by 1,624
An Introduction to Multi-Agent Systems
Balaji, P. G., & Srinivasan, D. (2010) · Studies in Computational Intelligence · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-14435-6_1 · Cited by 1,376
Contract, cooperation, and performance in international joint ventures
Luo, Y. (2002) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.261 · Cited by 787
Setting International Standards: Technological Rationality or Primacy of Power?
Mattli, W., & Büthe, T. (2003) · World Politics · doi:10.1353/wp.2004.0006 · Cited by 462
Coordinating perceptually grounded categories through language: A case study for colour
steels, L., & belpaeme, T. (2005) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x05000087 · Cited by 440
Metadata
- Authors
- Gibbons, R. S.
- Venue
- Princeton University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Princeton University Press
- Published
- 1992-12-31
- OpenAlex
- W1530756071
- Cited by
- 1,466
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.62
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Game Theory for Applied Economists. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1515/9781400835881
- The paper
- Gibbons, R. S. (1992). Game Theory for Applied Economists. Princeton University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400835881
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.