The Private Science of Louis Pasteur
Abstract
In The Private Science of Louis Pasteur , Gerald Geison has written a controversial biography that finally penetrates the secrecy that has surrounded much of this legendary scientist's laboratory work. Geison uses Pasteur's laboratory notebooks, made available only recently, and his published papers to present a rich and full account of some of the most famous episodes in the history of science and their darker sides--for example, Pasteur's rush to develop the rabies vaccine and the human risks his haste entailed. The discrepancies between the public record and the "private science" of Louis Pasteur tell us as much about the man as they do about the highly competitive and political world he learned to master. Although experimental ingenuity served Pasteur well, he also owed much of his success to the polemical virtuosity and political savvy that won him unprecedented financial support from the French state during the late nineteenth century. But a close look at his greatest achievements raises ethical issues. In the case of Pasteur's widely publicized anthrax vaccine, Geison reveals its initial defects and how Pasteur, in order to avoid embarrassment, secretly incorporated a rival colleague's findings to make his version of the vaccine work. Pasteur's premature decision to apply his rabies treatment to his first animal-bite victims raises even deeper questions and must be understood not only in terms of the ethics of human experimentation and scientific method, but also in li…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Analysis of Pasteur's correspondence and laboratory notebooks has allowed historians to decipher between myth and reality.
“Analysis of his correspondence and laboratory notebooks has allowed historians to decipher between myth and reality”
From Louis Pasteur: Between Myth and Reality (2022) · cites this paper as [3]
Before the first attempts on humans, between August 1884 and May 1885, experiments involved 26 dogs bitten by rabid dogs with three different vaccine approaches, with an overall success rate of 62%.
“Before the first attempts on humans, between August 1884 and May 1885, experiments involved 26 dogs bitten by rabid dogs with three different vaccine approaches. The overall success rate was 62%.”
From Louis Pasteur: Between Myth and Reality (2022) · cites this paper as [3]
None of the vaccine approaches tested in dogs before the first human attempts corresponded to the one used on Joseph Meister.
“However, none of them correspond to the one used on Joseph Meister.”
From Louis Pasteur: Between Myth and Reality (2022) · cites this paper as [3]
Pasteur experimented with his rabies vaccine in humans before he had accumulated sufficient evidence of the efficacy and safety of his vaccine.
“Pasteur experimented with his rabies vaccine in humans before he had accumulated sufficient evidence of the efficacy and safety of his vaccine.”
From Louis Pasteur: Between Myth and Reality (2022) · cites this paper as [3]
Pasteur was an average student whose scientific skills developed through persistent effort, contrary to the myth of him as a child prodigy.
“Although often seen as a child prodigy, Pasteur was an average student whose scientific skills developed through persistent effort.”
From Louis Pasteur: A Legacy Unmasked (2024) · cites this paper as [4]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Prevalence of Inappropriate Image Duplication in Biomedical Research Publications
Bik, E. M., Casadevall, A., & Fang, F. C. (2016) · mBio · doi:10.1128/mbio.00809-16 · Cited by 287 · see citing works
The reproducibility crisis in the age of digital medicine
Stupple, A., Singerman, D., & Celi, L. A. (2019) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-019-0079-z · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Serendipity in Recommender Systems: A Systematic Literature Review
Ziarani, R. J., & Ravanmehr, R. (2021) · Journal of Computer Science and Technology · doi:10.1007/s11390-020-0135-9 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Louis Pasteur: Between Myth and Reality
Cavaillon, J.-M., & Legout, S. (2022) · Biomolecules · doi:10.3390/biom12040596 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Louis Pasteur: A Legacy Unmasked
Jambholkar, P. C., Choudhari, S. G., & Sharma, M. (2024) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.68080 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Geison, G. L.
- Corresponding author
- Geison, Gerald L.
- Venue
- Princeton University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Princeton University Press
- Published
- 1996-12-31
- OpenAlex
- W2171059877
- Cited by
- 284
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 25.50
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Princeton University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
- Princeton University Press eBooks (submittedVersion)
- DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › History of Science and Medicine
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Historical Medical Research and Treatments
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Medical History and Innovations
- Keywords
- Louis Pasteur, history of immunology, rabies vaccine, anthrax vaccine, laboratory notebooks, scientific ethics, human experimentation, scientific rivalry, scientific politics, government research funding, 19th-century science
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review