Cited by 123Recommender Systems and TechniquesInformation Retrieval and Search BehaviorAdvanced Bandit Algorithms Research

Serendipity in Recommender Systems: A Systematic Literature Review

Ziarani, Reza Jafari, Ravanmehr, Reza·2021·Journal of Computer Science and Technology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11390-020-0135-9

Cites

99 of 99 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • To balance familiarity, diversity and novelty, it is necessary to consider the inclusion of serendipitous recommendations that are unexpected but still relevant.

    “Therefore, to balance out familiarity, diversity and novelty, it is necessary to consider the inclusion of serendipitous recommendations that are unexpected but still can be relevant (Ziarani and Ravanmehr 2021).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ziarani, R. J., & Ravanmehr, R.
Affiliations
Islamic Azad University, Tehran (IR)
Corresponding author
Ravanmehr, Reza
Venue
Journal of Computer Science and Technology
Published
2021-03-31
Volume
36
Issue
2
Pages
375-396
ISSN
  • 1000-9000 (ISSN-L)
  • 1860-4749
OpenAlex
W3154445493
Cited by
123
References
99
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 7
FWCI
2.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Computer Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Recommender Systems and Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Advanced Bandit Algorithms Research
Keywords
serendipity, recommender systems, serendipitous recommendation, novelty, recommendation diversity, recommendation relevance, recommendation evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review