Cited by 74Race, History, and American SocietyElectoral Systems and Political ParticipationMigration, Refugees, and Integration

Racial Realignment: The Transformation of American Liberalism, 1932-1965

Schickler, Eric·2016·Princeton University Press eBooks

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/9781400880973

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The relatively recent democratization of the American South accelerated a slow partisan realignment of voters along racial lines.

    “Mickey et al. (2017) point to the relatively recent democratization of the American South as accelerating a slow-moving partisan realignment of voters by race (Schickler 2016).”

    From Unwelcome Change: Coming to Terms with Democratic Backsliding (2018) · cites this paper as Schickler 2016

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schickler, E.
Corresponding author
Schickler, Eric
Venue
Princeton University Press eBooks
Published
2016-05-17
OpenAlex
W4231860442
Cited by
74
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 2
FWCI
9.75
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Princeton University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Race, History, and American Society
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Refugees, and Integration
Keywords
racial politics, racial voting, electoral realignment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review