The DOI matches its Crossref record.
1. Some Topics in Two-Person Games
Abstract
Several loosely-related essays are considered on the theory of finite, two-person games. The topics are (1) the block decomposition of symmetric games, (2) saddlepoints in matrices having submatrices with saddlepoints, (3) generalized saddlepoints and order matrices, (4) the existence of values in games with almostperfect information, and (5) the nonconvergence of ficitious play in non-zero-sum games. Throughout, there is an emphasis on features of the theory that depend only on the ordering of the payoffs, as opposed to their numerical values. (Author)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
(1994) · Cited by 5,513
Multiagent systems: algorithmic, game-theoretic, and logical foundations
(2009) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.46-5662 · Cited by 1,756
Adaptive and sophisticated learning in normal form games
Milgrom, P., & Roberts, J. (1991) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1016/0899-8256(91)90006-z · Cited by 334
Axtell, R. (2018) · Handbook of Computational Economics · doi:10.1016/bs.hescom.2018.05.001 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Shapley, L. S.
- Venue
- Advances in Game Theory. (AM-52)
- Publisher
- Princeton University Press
- Published
- 1964-12-31
- Pages
- 1-28
- OpenAlex
- W1491494309
- Cited by
- 539
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.31
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: 1. Some Topics in Two-Person Games. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1515/9781400882014-002
- The paper
- Shapley, L. S. (1964). 1. Some Topics in Two-Person Games. Advances in Game Theory. (AM-52). https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400882014-002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
