The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Theory of Ecological Communities (MPB-57)
Abstract
A plethora of different theories, models, and concepts make up the field of community ecology. Amid this vast body of work, is it possible to build one general theory of ecological communities? What other scientific areas might serve as a guiding framework? As it turns out, the core focus of community ecology—understanding patterns of diversity and composition of biological variants across space and time—is shared by evolutionary biology and its very coherent conceptual framework, population genetics theory. The Theory of Ecological Communities takes this as a starting point to pull together community ecology's various perspectives into a more unified whole. Mark Vellend builds a theory of ecological communities based on four overarching processes: selection among species, drift, dispersal, and speciation. These are analogues of the four central processes in population genetics theory—selection within species, drift, gene flow, and mutation—and together they subsume almost all of the many dozens of more specific models built to describe the dynamics of communities of interacting species. The result is a theory that allows the effects of many low-level processes, such as competition, facilitation, predation, disturbance, stress, succession, colonization, and local extinction to be understood as the underpinnings of high-level processes with widely applicable consequences for ecological communities. Reframing the numerous existing ideas in community ecology, The Theory of Ecological Communities provides a new way for thinking about biological composition and diversity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Role of priority effects in the early-life assembly of the gut microbiota
Sprockett, D., Fukami, T., & Relman, D. A. (2018) · Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1038/nrgastro.2017.173 · Cited by 419
Linking modern coexistence theory and contemporary niche theory
Letten, A. D., Ke, P., & Fukami, T. (2017) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.1002/ecm.1242 · Cited by 363
Plant diversity dynamics over space and time in a warming Arctic
García Criado, M., Myers-Smith, I. H., Bjorkman, A. D., Elmendorf, S. C., Normand, S., Aastrup, P., Aerts, R., Alatalo, J. M., Baeten, L., Björk, R. G., et al. (2025) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-025-08946-8 · Cited by 51
Self-citationUnderstanding the impact of third-party species on pairwise coexistence
Deng, J., Taylor, W., & Saavedra, S. (2022) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010630 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Vellend, M.
- Venue
- Princeton University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Princeton University Press
- Published
- 2016-09-28
- OpenAlex
- W2525840300
- Cited by
- 545
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 25.93
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Theory of Ecological Communities (MPB-57). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1515/9781400883790
- The paper
- Vellend, M. (2016). The Theory of Ecological Communities (MPB-57). Princeton University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400883790
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.