Cited by 152Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting IssuesAnthropological Studies and InsightsQualitative Research Methods and Ethics

14 Rites and Wrongs: An Insider/ Outsider Reflects on Power and Excision

Ahmadu, Fuambai·2001·Female "Circumcision" in Africa

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/9781685850036-015

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ahmadu, F.
Corresponding author
Ahmadu, Fuambai
Venue
Female "Circumcision" in Africa
Published
2001-06-01
Pages
283-312
OpenAlex
W3217051598
Cited by
152
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 8
FWCI
16.15
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Lynne Rienner Publishers eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting Issues
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Anthropological Studies and Insights
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
Keywords
female genital mutilation, excision, insider and outsider perspectives, power, rites of passage, women's rights

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review