The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Warlord Politics and African States
Abstract
The dramatic reconfigurations of political authority taking place in Africa—what many term "warlordism" or "state failure"—call for an exploration of the origins of these changes, the likelihood of their durability, and their implications for the continent's regional system of states. Reno argues that the end of the Cold War as a particular configuration of the international state system changed by definition the nature of sovereignty in Africa. Rulers cut off from overseas largess are now vulnerable to threats from strongmen; enterprising strongmen join with marginalized groups to exploit regime weakness; opposing groups traffic in illegal drugs, weapons, and natural resources and even forge foreign commercial partnerships. Focusing on the examples of Congo, Liberia, Nigeria, and Sierra Leone, Reno demonstrates how rulers hold on to power amidst cutoffs of foreign aid, collapsing economies, and disappearing bureaucracies. In his tightly argued book, he analyzes the emergence of a diversity of forms of political authority and the effect of their appearance on relations between states in the region; he also considers how the international system accommodates a growing variety of constitutive entities. The evidence presented contradicts the conventional wisdom that Africa's worst-off states are those increasingly marginal to the world economy. Ironically, closer integration of these states into global markets promotes warlord politics, not the bureaucratic forms of administration that most studies of reform in Africa prescribe.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Regions and Powers: The Structure of International Security
Buzan, B., & Wæver, O. (2003) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511491252 · Cited by 1,886
The political ecology of war: natural resources and armed conflicts
Le Billon, P. (2001) · Political Geography · doi:10.1016/s0962-6298(01)00015-4 · Cited by 1,508
What Do We Know about Natural Resources and Civil War?
Ross, M. L. (2004) · Journal of Peace Research · doi:10.1177/0022343304043773 · Cited by 1,358
First mover advantages in international business and firm-specific political resources
Frynas, J. G., Mellahi, K., & Pigman, G. A. (2006) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.519 · Cited by 419
Dynamics and Logics of Civil War
Cederman, L.-E., & Vogt, M. (2017) · Journal of Conflict Resolution · doi:10.1177/0022002717721385 · Cited by 214
Lagos, Koolhaas and Partisan Politics in Nigeria
FOURCHARD, L. (2011) · International Journal of Urban and Regional Research · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2427.2010.00938.x · Cited by 131
Carey, S. C., & Mitchell, N. J. (2017) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-051915-045433 · Cited by 106
GROWING QAWM: AN EVIDENCE-DRIVEN DECLARATIVE MODEL OF AFGHAN POWER STRUCTURES
GELLER, A., & MOSS, S. (2008) · Advances in Complex Systems · doi:10.1142/s0219525908001659 · Cited by 44
Lamin, A. R. (2003) · Journal of Asian and African Studies · doi:10.1177/002190960303800208 · Cited by 38
Kohnert (2006) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.921535 · Cited by 18
Black Markets and Militants: Informal Networks in the Middle East and Africa
Medani, K. M. (2021) · doi:10.1017/9781108961011 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Reno, W.
- Venue
- Lynne Rienner Publishers eBooks
- Publisher
- Lynne Rienner Publishers
- Published
- 1998-03-01
- OpenAlex
- W4300507873
- Cited by
- 1,062
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 63.48
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.