CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 91Scientific Research and Philosophical InquiryDiverse Interdisciplinary Research StudiesInformation Science and Libraries

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Towards a theory of information: The status of partial objects in semantics

Landman, Fred·1986·De Gruyter eBooks
DOI 10.1515/9783111715773
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/9783111715773

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Landman, F.
Corresponding author
Landman, Fred
Venue
De Gruyter eBooks
Publisher
De Gruyter
Published
1986-12-31
DOI
10.1515/9783111715773
OpenAlex
W203619470
Cited by
91
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
9.13
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
De Gruyter eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Scientific Research and Philosophical Inquiry
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Diverse Interdisciplinary Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Information Science and Libraries
Keywords
information theory, information

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review