The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
From Gamification to Gameful Design and Gameful Experience in Learning
Open accessAbstract
Learning is a goal driven social activity determined by motivational factors. To be able to efficiently gamify learning for improved student motivation and engagement, the educators have to understand the related aspects studied in games, motivational psychology and pedagogy. This will help them to identify the factors that drive and explain desired learning behaviors. This paper presents a survey of the main approaches employed in gamification and the emerging new directions in the context of the relevant motivational psychology and pedagogy. The focus is on the motivational factors that impact learning and understanding of behavior change. The purpose of the paper is two-fold: on one side, to provide analysis and guide to relevant works related to gamification along with outlining the emerging trends, and on the other, to provide foundation for evaluation and identification of the areas of possible improvements.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“As a part of online learning along with gamification, it has been used as a framework to investigate student's motivation and engagement (Dichev, Dicheva, Angelova, & Agre, 2015;Lamprinou & Paraskeva, 2015;Sailer, Hense, Mayr, & Mandl, 2017;Shi & Cristea, 2016).”
From Online learning readiness and attitudes towards gaming in gamified online learning – a mixed methods case study (2018) · cites this paper as Dichev, Dicheva, Angelova, & Agre, 2015
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.68 · Cited by 54,599
Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7 · Cited by 26,772
Maslow, A. H. (1943) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0054346 · Cited by 21,563
Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior
Miller, K. A. J., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1988) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2070638 · Cited by 15,406
Flow: the psychology of optimal experience
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-0597 · Cited by 12,654
Axford, N. (2017) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315258324-16 · Cited by 11,329
Handbook of Positive Psychology
(2001) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195135336.001.0001 · Cited by 9,158
From game design elements to gamefulness: defining "gamification"
Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011) · Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments · doi:10.1145/2181037.2181040 · Cited by 8,402
What Video Games Have to Teach Us about Learning and Literacy
(2004) · Education + Training · doi:10.1108/et.2004.00446dae.002 · Cited by 6,674
Kapp, K. M. (2012) · Cited by 3,753
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- K a p p, K. M. Games, Gamification, and the Quest for Learner Engagement. -T+D, Vol. 66, 2012, No 6, 64-68.
- Z i c h e r m a n n, G., C. C u n n i n g h a m. Gamification by Design. O'Reilly, 2011.
- S a l e n, K. Toward an Ecology of Gaming in the Ecology of Games: Connecting Youth, Games, and Learning toward an Ecology of Gaming in the Ecology of Games: Connecting Youth, Games, and Learning. Cambridge, MA, The MIT Press, 2008, 1-17.
- D e t e r d i n g, S. Skill Atoms as Design Lenses for User-Centered Gameful Design. -In: CHI'13, Paris, France, 2013.
- D e t e r d i n g, S., R. K h a l e d, L. N a c k e, D. D i x o n. Gamification: Toward a Definition. - In: CHI'11 Gamification Workshop, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2011.
- F i s h m a n, B., S. D e t e r d i n g. Beyond Badges and Points: Gameful Assessment Systems for Engagement in Formal Education. -In: Games, Learning, and Society Conference, Madison, WI, 2013.
- R a m e r i z, D., K. S q u i r e. Gamification for Education Reform, Gameful World. MIT Press, 2014.
- H o l m a n, C., B. F i s h m a n, S. A g u i l a r. Designing a Game-Inspired Learning Management System. -In: Games, Learning, and Society Conference, Madison, WI, 2013.
- H u n i c k e, R., M. L e B l a n c, R. Z u b e k. MDA: A Formal Approach to Game Design and Game Research. -In: Challenges in Game AI Workshop, Nineteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, San Jose, CA, 2004.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gamifying education: what is known, what is believed and what remains uncertain: a critical review
Dichev, C., & Dicheva, D. (2017) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-017-0042-5 · Cited by 2,112
“, 2015), where students can improve their algorithmic skills by practicing with interactive exercises (Dichev et al. 2014).”
Self-citationde‐Marcos, L., García‐López, E., & García‐Cabot, A. (2015) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2015.12.008 · Cited by 281
Adaptive gamification in e-learning based on students’ learning styles
Awais, M., Habiba, U., Majeed, F., & Shoaib, M. (2019) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2019.1588745 · Cited by 264
Ratinho, E., & Martins, C. (2023) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19033 · Cited by 221
Gamification and learning: a review of issues and research
Faiella, F., & Ricciardi, M. (2015) · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · doi:10.20368/1971-8829/1072 · Cited by 225
Metadata
- Authors
- Dichev, C., Dicheva, D., Angelova, G., & Agre, G.
- Affiliations
- Winston-Salem State University (US)
- Bulgarian Academy of Sciences (BG)
- Corresponding author
- Dicheva, Darina
- Venue
- Cybernetics and Information Technologies
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 2015-01-31
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 80-100
- ISSN
- 1311-9702 (ISSN-L)
- 1314-4081
- OpenAlex
- W1534437798
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4
- FWCI
- 25.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Cybernetics and Information Technologies (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- European Commission (316087)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Games and Gamification
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Games and Media
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
- Keywords
- gamification, gameful design, gameful experience, student motivation, student engagement, psychology of motivation, pedagogy, behavior change, game-based learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review