The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Preanalytical quality improvement: in quality we trust
Open accessAbstract
Total quality in laboratory medicine should be defined as the guarantee that each activity throughout the total testing process is correctly performed, providing valuable medical decision-making and effective patient care. In the past decades, a 10-fold reduction in the analytical error rate has been achieved thanks to improvements in both reliability and standardization of analytical techniques, reagents, and instrumentation. Notable advances in information technology, quality control and quality assurance methods have also assured a valuable contribution for reducing diagnostic errors. Nevertheless, several lines of evidence still suggest that most errors in laboratory diagnostics fall outside the analytical phase, and the pre- and postanalytical steps have been found to be much more vulnerable. This collective paper, which is the logical continuum of the former already published in this journal 2 years ago, provides additional contribution to risk management in the preanalytical phase and is a synopsis of the lectures of the 2nd European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM)-Becton Dickinson (BD) European Conference on Preanalytical Phase meeting entitled “Preanalytical quality improvement: in quality we trust” (Zagreb, Croatia, 1–2 March 2013). The leading topics that will be discussed include quality indicators for preanalytical phase, phlebotomy practices for collection of blood gas analysis and pediatric samples, lipemia and blood collection tube interferences, preanalytical requirements of urinalysis, molecular biology hemostasis and platelet testing, as well as indications on best practices for safe blood collection. Auditing of the preanalytical phase by ISO assessors and external quality assessment for preanalytical phase are also discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bonini, P., Plebani, M., Ceriotti, F., & Rubboli, F. (2002) · Clinical Chemistry · doi:10.1093/clinchem/48.5.691 · Cited by 850
Self-citationDoes POCT reduce the risk of error in laboratory testing?
Plebani, M. (2009) · Clinica Chimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.cca.2009.03.014 · Cited by 97
Self-citation
Cited by
Reference intervals: current status, recent developments and future considerations
Ozarda, Y. (2016) · Biochemia Medica · doi:10.11613/bm.2016.001 · Cited by 264
Lippi, G., von Meyer, A., Cadamuro, J., & Simundic, A.-M. (2019) · Diagnosis · doi:10.1515/dx-2018-0018 · Cited by 135
Self-citationNikolac, N., Šupak Smolčić, V., Šimundić, A.-M., & Ćelap, I. (2013) · Biochemia Medica · doi:10.11613/bm.2013.031 · Cited by 99
Self-citationSimundic, A.-M., Cornes, M., Grankvist, K., Lippi, G., Nybo, M., Kovalevskaya, S., Sprongl, L., Sumarac, Z., & Church, S. (2013) · Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) · doi:10.1515/cclm-2013-0283 · Cited by 84
Self-citationPatient identification and tube labelling – a call for harmonisation
van Dongen-Lases, E. C., Cornes, M. P., Grankvist, K., Ibarz, M., Kristensen, G. B. B., Lippi, G., Nybo, M., Simundic, A.-M., & on behalf of the Working Group for Preanalytical Phase (WG-P (2016) · Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) · doi:10.1515/cclm-2015-1089 · Cited by 69
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Lippi, G., Becan-McBride, K., Behúlová, D., Bowen, R. A., Church, S., Delanghe, J., Grankvist, K., Kitchen, S., Nybo, M., Nauck, M., Nikolac, N., Palicka, V., Plebani, M., Sandberg, S., & Simundic, A.-M.
- Venue
- Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 2012-10-16
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 229-241
- ISSN
- 1434-6621 (ISSN-L)
- 1437-4331
- OpenAlex
- W2031921792
- Cited by
- 236
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 15.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Preanalytical quality improvement: in quality we trust. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1515/cclm-2012-0597
- The paper
- Lippi, G., Becan-McBride, K., Behúlová, D., Bowen, R. A., Church, S., Delanghe, J., Grankvist, K., Kitchen, S., Nybo, M., Nauck, M., Nikolac, N., Palicka, V., Plebani, M., Sandberg, S., & Simundic, A.-M. (2013). Preanalytical quality improvement: in quality we trust. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM). https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2012-0597
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.