Cited by 18Non-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringHemodynamic Monitoring and TherapyCardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention

Continuous non-invasive monitoring of blood pressure in the operating room: a cuffless optical technology at the fingertip

Open access
Solà, Josep, Proença, Martin, Braun, Fabian, Pierrel, Nicolas, Degiorgis, Yan, Verjus, Christophe, Lemay, Mathieu, Bertschi, Mattia +1 more·2016·Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering

Abstract

Routine monitoring of blood pressure during general anaesthesia relies on intermittent measurements with a non-invasive brachial cuff every five minutes. This manuscript provides first experimental evidence that a physiology-based pulse wave analysis algorithm applied to optical data (as provided by a standard fingertip pulse oximeter) is capable of accurately estimating blood pressure changes in-between cuff readings. Combined with the routine use of oscillometric cuffs, the presented novel approach is a candidate technology to increase patient safety by providing beat-to-beat hemodynamic measurements without the need of invasive monitoring procedures.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/cdbme-2016-0060

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • New devices that promise to change the current paradigm of hypertension monitoring use either inflating wristband cuffs or optical pulse wave-based metrics of BP.

    “New devices that promise to change the current paradigm of hypertension monitoring use either inflating wristband cuffs (e.g., Omron HeartGuide, currently undergoing clinical testing) or optical pulse wave-based metrics of BP [75,76].”

    From Wearables and the Medical Revolution (2018) · cites this paper as [75]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Solà, J., Proença, M., Braun, F., Pierrel, N., Degiorgis, Y., Verjus, C., Lemay, M., Bertschi, M., & Schoettker, P.
Affiliations
  • Swiss Center for Electronics and Microtechnology (Switzerland) (CH)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CH)
Corresponding author
Solà, Josep
Venue
Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering
Published
2016-09-01
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
267-271
ISSN
2364-5504 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2560755629
Cited by
18
References
4
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
Keywords
cuffless blood pressure measurement, pulse wave analysis, general anesthesia, operating room monitoring, non-invasive blood pressure estimation, patient safety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review