Cited by 17Wood Treatment and PropertiesTree-ring climate responsesHygrothermal properties of building materials

In-situ density estimation by four nondestructive techniques on Norway spruce from built-in wood structures

Open access
Llana, Daniel F., Íñiguez-González, Guillermo, Montón, Joaquín, Arriaga, Francisco·2018·Holzforschung

Abstract

Needle penetration resistance (NPR), screw withdrawal resistance (SWR), core drilling (CD) and drilling chips extraction (DCE) are nondestructive and semi-destructive techniques used to estimate density in timber structures. In most of the previous studies, these techniques were tested in clear sawn timber and clear specimens. The goal of the present paper is to study the relationship between density and these techniques by means of five different devices in whole pieces of timber from built-in engineering structures, which are from 12 4.5-m long structural timber joists of Norway spruce from a 19 th century building in Barcelona (Catalonia, Spain). Although determination coefficients (R 2) for density estimation models were lower than those from clear timber, the results obtained confirmed that these four techniques are suitable for in-situ density estimation of woods in buildings. The best results were obtained by CD (the bigger the bit, the higher the correlation), followed by DCE, and SWR. The worst correlation was found for NPR devices, but the results could be probably improved with more measurements.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/hf-2018-0027

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Applying the mean chip mass from Table 5 to the estimation model proposed by Llana et al. [68] yields a specimen density of 410 kg/m3, lower than 452 kg/m3 obtained in the present study.

    “If specimen density is calculated introducing the mean chips mass of Table 5 in the estimation model proposed by Llana et al. [68] for the same species that the present study, the result obtained is 410 kg m 3 . This result is lower than 452 kg m 3 obtained in the present study.”
  • The R2 for density estimation using RML was slightly lower than 0.70 reported by Llana et al. [68] for recovered Norway spruce and 0.76 reported by Osuna-Sequera et al. [36] for recovered Salzmann pine.

    “In the case of RML, R 2 shown in Table 6 was slightly lower than R 2 equal to 0.70 for recovered Norway spruce reported by Llana et al. [68] and R 2 equal to 0.76 for recovered Salzmann pine ( Pinus nigra Arnold ssp. salzmannii (Dunal) Franco) reported by Osuna-Sequera et al. [36].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Bobadilla, I., Íñiguez, G., Esteban, M., Arriaga, F., Casas, L. (2007) Density estimation by screw withdrawal resistance and probing in structural sawn coniferous timber. Proceedings of the 15th International Symposium on Nondestructive Testing of Wood. September 10-12. Duluth, MN, USA. pp. 247-251.
  2. Bobadilla, I., Martínez, R.D., Calvo, J., Arriaga, F., Íñiguez-González, G. (2013) First steps in wood density estimation using a con- ventional drill. 18th International Nondestructive Testing and Evaluation of Wood Symposium. September 24-27. Madison, WI, USA. pp. 112-118.
  3. Carballo, J., Hermoso, E., Díez, M.R. (2009) Ensayos no destruc- tivos sobre madera estructural. Una revisión de 30 años en España. [Non-destructive testing on structural timber. A review of the last 30 years in Spain]. Revista forestal (Costa Rica) 6:1-16.
  4. Ceccotti, A., Togni, M. (1996) NDT on ancient timber beams: assess- ment of strength/stiffness properties combining visual and instrumental methods. Proceedings of 10th International symposium on nondestructive testing of wood. August 26-28. Lausanne, Switzerland, pp. 379-388.
  5. Cockrell, R.A. (1933) A study of the screw-holding properties of wood. Tech. Pub. 44. Bulletin of the New York State College of Forestry of Syracuse, N.Y. 27 p.
  6. Divós, F., Jarasi, J., Hodasz, E., Nemeth, L. (1994) Screw withdrawal force as strength predictor. Proceedings of 1st European Symposium on Nondestructive Evaluation of Wood. September 21-23. Sopron, Hungary. p. 532.
  7. Esteban, M., Bobadilla, I., Arriaga, F., Íñiguez, G., García, H. (2009) NDT applied to estimate the mechanical properties of the timber of an ancient structure in Valsaín, Segovia (Spain). Pro- ceedings of 16th International Symposium on Nondestructive Testing of Wood. October 12-14. Beijing, China. pp. 152-157.
  8. Hoffmeyer, P. (1978) The Pilodyn as a non-destructive tester of the shock resistance of wood. Proceedings of 4th Nondestructive Testing of Wood Symposium. August 28-30. Vancouver, WA, USA. pp. 47-66.
  9. Íñiguez, G. (2007) Clasificación mediante técnicas no destructivas y evaluación de las propiedades mecánicas de la madera aserrada de coníferas de gran escuadría para uso estructural. [Grading by non destructive techniques and assessment of the mechanical properties of large cross section coniferous sawn timber for structural use]. Doctoral thesis. Universidad Politéc- nica de Madrid, ETS de Ingenieros de Montes. 223 p. PDF file: http://oa.upm.es/415.
  10. Íñiguez, G., Arriaga, F., Esteban, M., Bobadilla, I., González, C., Martínez, R.D. (2010) In situ non-destructive density estimation for the assessment of existing timber structures. Proceedings of World Conference of Timber Engineering (WCTE). June 20-24. Riva di Garda, Italy. 8 p. Íñiguez-González, G., Arriaga, F., Esteban, M., Llana, D.F. (2015a) Reference conditions and modification factors for the standardization of nondestructive variables used in the evaluation of existing timber structures. Constr. Build. Mater. 101:1166-1171.
  11. Kasal, B. (1997) Use of cylindrical specimens in evaluation of some mechanical properties of in-situ wood members. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Structural Studies, Repairs and Maintenance of Historical Buildings (STREMAH V). San Sebastian, Spain. pp. 103-109.
  12. Kasal, B., Tannert, T. In Situ Assessment of Structural Timber. RILEM State of the Art Reports, vol. 7. Springer, Heidelberg, 2010. 124 p.
  13. Llana, D.F. (2016) Influencia de factores físicos y geométricos en la clasificación estructural de la madera mediante técnicas no destructivas [The influence of physical and geometrical factors on timber stress-grading by non-destructive techniques]. Doc- toral thesis. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, ETSI Montes, Forestal y del Medio Natural. 412 p. DOI and pdf file: https:// doi.org/10.20868/UPM.thesis.43696. · DOI
  14. Martínez, R.D. (2016) Métodos no destructivos de estimación de la densidad de madera. [Timber density estimation by non- destructive methods]. Doctoral thesis. Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, EPS de Lugo. 214 p. PDF file: https://minerva. usc.es/xmlui/handle/10347/15159.
  15. Montero, M.J. (2013) Clasificación de madera estructural de gran escuadría de Pinus sylvestris L. mediante métodos no destruc- tivos [Grading of large cross section structural timber of Pinus sylvestris L. by non destructive techniques]. Doctoral thesis. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, ETS de Ingenieros de Montes. 345 p. PDF file:http://oa.upm.es/15201/
  16. Montón, J. (2012) Clasificación estructural de la Madera de Pinus radiata D. Don procedente de Cataluña mediante métodos no destructivos y su aplicabilidad en la diagnosis structural [Struc- tural timber grading of Pinus radiata D. Don from Catalonia using NDT and applicability in structural assessment]. Doctoral thesis. Universidad Politécnica de Cataluña, Departamento de construcciones arquitectónicas I. 2 vol. 486 p. PDF: http:// www.tdx.cat/handle/10803/96423.
  17. Pressler, M.R. (1866) Der forstliche Zuwachsbohrer [The forestry increment borer]. In: Tharander Jahrbuch. Arnoldische Buch- handlung, Leipzig. Dritte Abtheilung III. pp. 137-209.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Llana, D. F., Íñiguez-González, G., Montón, J., & Arriaga, F.
Affiliations
  • Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway (IE)
  • Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (ES)
Corresponding author
Íñiguez-González, Guillermo
Venue
Holzforschung
Published
2018-10-25
Volume
72
Issue
10
Pages
871-879
ISSN
  • 0018-3830 (ISSN-L)
  • 1437-434X
OpenAlex
W2892586786
Cited by
17
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2
FWCI
2.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Holzforschung (publishedVersion)
  • UPCommons institutional repository (Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • RECERCAT (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Wood Treatment and Properties
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Tree-ring climate responses
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Hygrothermal properties of building materials
Keywords
wood density estimation, Norway spruce, screw withdrawal strength, core drilling, in situ density measurement, historic buildings, non-destructive testing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review