Cited by 16Wood Treatment and PropertiesStructural Engineering and Materials AnalysisTree-ring climate responses

Wood Density Determination by Drilling Chips Extraction in Ten Softwood and Hardwood Species

Open access
Martínez, Roberto D., Balmori, José-Antonio, F. Llana, Daniel, Bobadilla, Ignacio·2020·Forests

Abstract

Research Highlights: The novelty of this study is the development of an accurate wood density estimation method based on a relatively brand new semi-destructive testing technique (drilling chips extraction). This method is especially crucial in the assessment of existing timber structures. Background and Objectives: Probing, drilling, and coring are non-destructive and semi-destructive techniques commonly used for timber density estimation in existing timber structures. Most of these techniques show poor or medium accuracy or are so expensive or destructive. This paper aims to obtain accurate estimation models for wood density in existing structures using the easy to use drilling chips extraction technique. Materials and Methods: 300 specimens (95 × 65 × 200 mm3) from ten softwood and hardwood species covering a wide range of density (from 350 to 980 kg·m−3) were tested after conditioning. The Wood Extractor device based on the drilling chips extraction technique was used in the radial and the tangential direction. Mass of the chips collected (drilling residue) from each drill was recorded. Results: Density obtained from drilling residue was not statistically significantly different between radial and tangential directions avoiding take into account direction when measuring. The density obtained in the whole specimens is slightly higher than the density obtained by drilling residue being this difference uniformly through the range of densities studied. Two different estimation models were presented with high determination coefficients (96% and 97%) and low standard errors. These results were similar to those obtained by other authors using core drilling but causing less damage. Conclusions: Drilling chips extractor is a simple, reliable and inexpensive method to estimate density in existing structures with accuracy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/f11040383

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some NDT techniques have been successfully used for density estimation, such as drilling chips extraction and drilling penetration resistance.

    “Some NDT techniques have been successfully used for density estimation, such as Drilling chips extraction [37,38] and Drilling penetration resistance [39 -41].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Esteban, M. Determinación de la Capacidad Resistente de la Madera Estructural de Gran Escuadría y su Aplicación en Estructuras Existentes de Madera de Conífera [Determination of the Load Carrying Capacity of Large Cross Section Structural Coniferous Timber on Existing Structures]. Ph.D. Thesis, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain, September 2003.
  2. Arriaga, F.; Garcia, L.; Gebremedhin, K.G.; Peraza, F. Grading and load carrying capacity of old timber beams. In Proceedings of the International Summer Meeting, American Society of Agricultural Engineers, Charlotte, NC, USA, 25-28 June 1992.
  3. Bobadilla, I.; Íñiguez-González, G.; Esteban, M.; Arriaga, F.; Casas, L. Density estimation by screw withdrawal resistance and probing in structural sawn coniferous timber. In Proceedings of the 15th International Symposium on Nondestructive Testing of Wood, Duluth, MN, USA, 10-12 September 2007; pp. 247-251.
  4. Montón, J. Clasificación Estructural de la Madera de Pinus radiata D. Don Procedente de Cataluña Mediante Métodos no Destructivos y su Aplicabilidad en la Diagnosis Structural [Structural Timber Grading of Pinus radiata D. Don from Catalonia Using NDT and Applicability in Structural Assessment]. Ph.D. Thesis, Universidad Politécnica de Cataluña, Barcelona, Spain, October 2012.
  5. Iñiguez-González, G.; Arriaga, F.; Esteban, M.; Bobadilla, I.; González, C.; Martínez, R.D. In situ non-destructive density estimation for the assessement of existing timber structures. In Proceedings of the 10th World Conference Timber Engineering, Riva di Garda, Italy, 20-24 June 2010; pp. 1124-1149.
  6. Mariño, R.; Fernández, M.E.; Fernández, C. Análisis comparativo de la densidad de la madera de Pinus sylvestris L. mediante la utilización del resistógrafo [Comparative análisis of wood density from Pinus sylvestris L. using resistograph]. Revista CIS-Madera 2002, 9, 60-70.
  7. Kloiber, M.; Kotlínová, M. Prediction of mechanical properties by means of radial cores in situ, NSF/MŠMT supported US-Czech project and RILEM Workshop. In Proceedings of the In-Situ Evaluation of Historic Wood and Masonry Structures, Prague, Czech Republic, 10-14 July 2006.
  8. Bobadilla, I.; Martínez, R.D.; Calvo, J.; Arriaga, F.; Íñiguez-González, G. First steps in wood density estimation using a conventional drill. In Proceedings of the 18th International Nondestructive Testing and Evaluation of Wood Symposium, Madison, WI, USA, 24-27 September 2013; pp. 112-118.
  9. Ruy, M.; Gonçalves, R.; Martínez, R.D.; Bertolo, C.; Mansini, R.; Leite, M. First steps in wood density estimation using a conventional drill. In Proceedings of the 21th International Nondestructive Testing and Evaluation of Wood Symposium, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany, 24-27 September 2019; pp. 162-166.
  10. Bues, C.T.; Schulz, F.; Eichenseer, F. Untersuchung des Ausziehwiderstands von Nägeln und Schrauben in Kiefernholz [Comparative investigations on the withdrawal resistance of nails and screws in pine]. Holz Roh-und Werkstoff 1987, 45, 514.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Martínez, R. D., Balmori, J.-A., F. Llana, D., & Bobadilla, I.
Affiliations
  • Universidad de Valladolid (ES)
  • Timber Engineering Research Group, NUI Galway, H91HX31 Galway, Ireland
  • Timber Construction Research Group, UPM, 28040 Madrid, Spain
Corresponding author
Martínez, Roberto D.
Venue
Forests
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2020-03-27
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
383
ISSN
1999-4907 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3014007270
Cited by
16
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2
FWCI
1.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Forests (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Hispana (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • University of Valladolid Documentary Repository (University of Valladolid) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (BIA2014-55089-P)
  • AITIM (Proyect AITIM-Fucovasa 2012–2013, Proyect AITIM Fucovasa 2014–2015)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Wood Treatment and Properties
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Structural Engineering and Materials Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Tree-ring climate responses
Keywords
wood density estimation, semi-destructive testing, softwood, hardwood, non-destructive testing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review