Cited by 129Skin and Cellular Biology ResearchBioinformatics and Genomic NetworksDermatology and Skin Diseases

The top skin-associated genes: a comparative analysis of human and mouse skin transcriptomes

Gerber, Peter Arne, Buhren, Bettina Alexandra, Schrumpf, Holger, Homey, Bernhard, Zlotnik, Albert, Hevezi, Peter·2014·Biological Chemistry

Abstract

The mouse represents a key model system for the study of the physiology and biochemistry of skin. Comparison of skin between mouse and human is critical for interpretation and application of data from mouse experiments to human disease. Here, we review the current knowledge on structure and immunology of mouse and human skin. Moreover, we present a systematic comparison of human and mouse skin transcriptomes. To this end, we have recently used a genome-wide database of human gene expression to identify genes highly expressed in skin, with no, or limited expression elsewhere – human skin-associated genes (hSAGs). Analysis of our set of hSAGs allowed us to generate a comprehensive molecular characterization of healthy human skin. Here, we used a similar database to generate a list of mouse skin-associated genes (mSAGs). A comparative analysis between the top human (n=666) and mouse (n=873) skin-associated genes (SAGs) revealed a total of only 30.2% identity between the two lists. The majority of shared genes encode proteins that participate in structural and barrier functions. Analysis of the top functional annotation terms revealed an overlap for morphogenesis, cell adhesion, structure, and signal transduction. The results of this analysis, discussed in the context of published data, illustrate the diversity between the molecular make up of skin of both species and grants a probable explanation, why results generated in murine in vivo models often fail to translate into the human.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/hsz-2013-0279

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gerber, P. A., Buhren, B. A., Schrumpf, H., Homey, B., Zlotnik, A., & Hevezi, P.
Affiliations
  • Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (DE)
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
Corresponding author
  • Gerber, Peter Arne
  • Hevezi, Peter
Venue
Biological Chemistry
Published
2014-02-05
Volume
395
Issue
6
Pages
577-591
ISSN
  • 1431-6730 (ISSN-L)
  • 1437-4315
OpenAlex
W2333854363
Cited by
129
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 2
FWCI
3.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biological Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Skin and Cellular Biology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatology and Skin Diseases
Keywords
comparative genomics, skin barrier function, skin anatomy, skin immunology, skin gene expression, gene ontology annotation
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Skin, Skin Diseases, Dideoxynucleosides, Gene Expression Profiling, Models, Animal, Mice, Transcriptome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review