Cited by 9Cardiovascular Health and Disease PreventionNon-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringCardiovascular Function and Risk Factors

Can pulse wave velocity (PWV) alone express arterial stiffness? A neglected tool for vascular function assessment

De Luca, Mariarosaria, Iacono, Olimpia, Valente, Valeria, Giardino, Federica, Crisci, Giulia, Lettieri, Maddalena, Marra, Alberto, Giallauria, Francesco +1 more·2022·Journal of Basic and Clinical Physiology and Pharmacology

Abstract

Arterial stiffness, defined as the rigidity of the arterial wall, is the consequence of vascular aging and is associated with the full spectrum of cardiovascular diseases. Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cf-PWV) is the gold standard method for arterial stiffness evaluation: it measures the velocity of the arterial pulse along the thoracic and abdominal aorta alongside arterial distensibility. Its value rises as stiffness progresses. Cf-PWV is helpful to assess residual cardiovascular risk (CVR) in hypertension (HT). In fact, an increase in pulsatility and arterial stiffness predicts CVR in patients affected by arterial HT, independently of other risk factors. Arterial stiffness can predict cardiovascular events in several other clinical conditions such as heart failure, diabetes, and pulmonary HT. However, cf-PWV has not been yet included in routine clinical practice so far. A possible reason might be its methodological and theoretical limitations (inaccuracy in the traveled distance, intra and interindividual variability, lack of well-defined references values, and age- and blood pressure-independent cutoff). To exceed these limits a strict adherence to guidelines, use of analytical approaches, and possibility of integrating the results with other stiffness examinations are essential approaches.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/jbcpp-2021-0193

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
De Luca, M., Iacono, O., Valente, V., Giardino, F., Crisci, G., Lettieri, M., Marra, A., Giallauria, F., & Oliviero, U.
Affiliations
  • Department of Translational Medical Sciences , “Federico II” University , Naples , Italy
  • University of Naples Federico II (IT)
  • University Hospital Heidelberg (DE)
Venue
Journal of Basic and Clinical Physiology and Pharmacology
Published
2021-07-20
Volume
33
Issue
4
Pages
373-379
ISSN
  • 0792-6855 (ISSN-L)
  • 2191-0286
OpenAlex
W3184399295
Cited by
9
References
53
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2
FWCI
1.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Basic and Clinical Physiology and Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Keywords
arterial stiffness, carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity, vascular aging, cardiovascular risk, hypertension, arterial distensibility, vascular function assessment, reference values, cut-off values
MeSH terms
Aging, Blood Pressure, Humans, Hypertension, Vascular Stiffness, Pulse Wave Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review