Cited by 1,515Cardiovascular Health and Disease PreventionCardiovascular Function and Risk FactorsBlood Pressure and Hypertension Studies

Prognostic value of aortic pulse wave velocity as index of arterial stiffness in the general population

Open access
Willum Hansen, Tine, Staessen, Jan A., Torp-Pedersen, Christian, Rasmussen, Susanne, Thijs, Lutgarde, Ibsen, Hans, Jeppesen, Jørgen·2006·Circulation

Abstract

Background— Few population studies addressed the prognostic significance of aortic pulse wave velocity (APWV) above and beyond other cardiovascular risk factors. Methods and Results— We studied a sex- and age-stratified random sample of 1678 Danes aged 40 to 70 years. We used Cox regression to investigate the prognostic value of APWV, office pulse pressure (PP), and 24-hour ambulatory PP while adjusting for mean arterial pressure (MAP) and other covariates. Over a median follow-up of 9.4 years, the incidence of fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular end points, cardiovascular mortality, and fatal and nonfatal coronary heart disease amounted to 154, 62, and 101 cases, respectively. We adjusted for sex, age, body mass index, MAP measured in the office (conventional PP and APWV) or by ambulatory monitoring (24-hour PP), smoking, and alcohol intake. With these adjustments, APWV maintained its prognostic significance in relation to each end point ( P <0.05), whereas office and 24-hour PP lost their predictive value ( P >0.19), except for office PP in relation to coronary heart disease ( P =0.02). For each 1-SD increment in APWV (3.4 m/s), the risk of an event increased by 16% to 20%. In sensitivity analyses, APWV still predicted all cardiovascular events after standardization to a heart rate of 60 beats per minute, after adjustment for 24-hour MAP instead of office MAP, and/or after additional adjustment for the ratio of total to HDL serum cholesterol and diabetes mellitus at baseline. Conclusions— In a general Danish population, APWV predicted a composite of cardiovascular outcomes above and beyond traditional cardiovascular risk factors, including 24-hour MAP.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circulationaha.105.579342

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity provides a comprehensive non-invasive assessment of arterial stiffness and has independent predictive value for all-cause and cardiovascular morbidity, coronary events, and strokes in patients with uncomplicated essential hypertension and in the general population.

    “Measurement of carotid -femoral pulse wave velocity provides a comprehensive non-invasive assessment of arterial stiffness 423 and has an independent predictive value for all-cause and cardiovascular morbidity, coronary events, and strokes in patients with uncomplicated essential hypertension as well as in the general population.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Asmar R, Benetos A, Topouchian J, Laurent P, Pannier B, Brisac AM, Target R, Levy BI. Assessment of arterial distensibility by automatic pulse wave velocity measurement. Hypertension. 1995;26:485-490.
  2. Lantelme P, Mestre C, Lievre M, Gressard A, Milon H. Heart rate: an important confounder of pulse wave velocity assessment. Hypertension. 2002;39:1083-1087.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Willum Hansen, T., Staessen, J. A., Torp-Pedersen, C., Rasmussen, S., Thijs, L., Ibsen, H., & Jeppesen, J.
Affiliations
  • From the Research Center for Prevention and Health, Copenhagen, Denmark (T.W.H.); Laboratory of Hypertension, Department of Molecular and Cardiovascular Research, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (J.A.S., L.T.); Department of Cardiology, Bispebjerg University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark (C.T.-P., T.W.H.); and Medical Department M, Glostrup University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark (J.J., S.R., H.I.).
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
Venue
Circulation
Published
2006-02-07
Volume
113
Issue
5
Pages
664-670
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2147994802
Cited by
1,515
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 61 · 2021: 65 · 2020: 63 · 2019: 63 · 2018: 84 · 2017: 83 · 2016: 82 · 2015: 105 · 2014: 114 · 2013: 92 · 2012: 100
FWCI
67.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Circulation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Hjerteforeningen (01-2-9-9A-22914)
  • Lægeforeningen
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Keywords
aortic pulse wave velocity, arterial stiffness, cardiovascular prognosis, cardiovascular mortality, coronary artery disease, pulse pressure, ambulatory blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, cardiovascular risk factors, general population
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aorta, Cardiovascular Diseases, Denmark, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Prognosis, Pulsatile Flow, Pulse, Regression Analysis, Vascular Resistance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review