Cited by 6Pregnancy and preeclampsia studiesNeonatal Health and BiochemistryMaternal and Perinatal Health Interventions

Relationship between various maternal conditions and lactic acid dehydrogenase activity in umbilical cord blood at birth

Patavoukas, Evangelos, Åberg-Liesaho, Josefina, Halvorsen, Cecilia Pegelow, Winbladh, Birger, Wiberg-Itzel, Eva·2018·Journal of Perinatal Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lactic acid dehydrogenase (LDH) is a valuable marker for some of the most important diseases in newborns and the plasma LDH activity in newborns correlates well with conditions such as asphyxia. If LDH should be considered as a useful tool also in obstetric care, key factors associated with maternal health before and during pregnancy which could affect umbilical cord LDH activity need to be known. The aims of this study were to explore relationships between selected maternal conditions and arterial lactic acid dehydrogenase activity (aLDH) in umbilical cord blood at delivery. METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted at Sodersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden. Included in the study were 1247 deliveries, and cord blood samples from each were analyzed for aLDH. Background, delivery and neonatal data were collected from the medical records. RESULTS: Higher median values of aLDH were found (P=0.001) among women with chronic disorders not related to pregnancy but there was no increased frequency of high aLDH levels (>612 μ/L, P=0.30). No difference in aLDH was identified between infants born to women with pregnancy-related disorders compared with healthy women, neither in median values, nor in high values (>612 μ/L, P=0.95). CONCLUSION: Newborn infants born to women with non-pregnancy-related chronic disorders had a somewhat higher median value of aLDH in cord blood at delivery. The influence of common maternal conditions and diseases on umbilical cord arterial LDH levels is small compared to the increase reported in fetal distress and several other critical conditions in the newborn.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/jpm-2017-0044

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Patavoukas, E., Åberg-Liesaho, J., Halvorsen, C. P., Winbladh, B., & Wiberg-Itzel, E.
Affiliations
Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Venue
Journal of Perinatal Medicine
Published
2018-08-28
Volume
46
Issue
6
Pages
605-611
ISSN
  • 0300-5577 (ISSN-L)
  • 1619-3997
OpenAlex
W2885922182
Cited by
6
References
17
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2
FWCI
1.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Perinatal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Hort Innovation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Neonatal Health and Biochemistry
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Keywords
lactate dehydrogenase, umbilical cord blood, maternal condition, pregnancy disorders, fetal asphyxia, neonatal biomarkers
MeSH terms
Maternal Health, Adolescent, Adult, Chronic Disease, Female, Fetal Blood, Fetal Distress, Hemolysis, Humans, Infant, Newborn, L-Lactate Dehydrogenase, Male, Middle Aged, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Prospective Studies, Reference Values, Risk Factors, Sweden, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review