The DOI matches its Crossref record.
New scoring system for fetal neurobehavior assessed by three- and four-dimensional sonography
Abstract
AIM: To produce a new scoring system for fetal neurobehavior based on prenatal assessment by 3D/4D sonography. We identified severely brain damaged infants and those with optimal neurological findings and compared fetal with neonatal findings. RESULTS: The new scoring system was retrospectively applied in a group of 100 low-risk pregnancies. After delivery, postnatal neurological assessment was performed, and all neonates assessed as normal reached a score between 14 and 20, which we assumed to be a score of optimal neurological development. Subsequently, the same scoring system was applied in the group of 120 high-risk pregnancies in which, based on postnatal neurological findings, three subgroups of newborns were found: normal, mildly or moderately abnormal, and abnormal. Normal neonates had a prenatal score between 14 and 20, mildly or moderately abnormal neonates had a prenatal score of 5-13, whereas those infants who were assigned as neurologically abnormal had a prenatal score from 0-5. CONCLUSION: A new scoring system for the assessment of neurological status for antenatal application is proposed, similar to the neonatal optimality test of Amiel-Tison. This preliminary work may help in detecting fetal brain and neurodevelopmental alterations due to in utero brain impairment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Neurodevelopmental fetal assessment using KANET scoring system in low and high risk pregnancies
Athanasiadis, A. P., Mikos, T., Tambakoudis, G. P., Theodoridis, T. D., Papastergiou, M., Assimakopoulos, E., & Tarlatzis, B. C. (2013) · The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine · doi:10.3109/14767058.2012.695824 · Cited by 360
Recognition of facial expression of fetuses by artificial intelligence (AI)
Miyagi, Y., Hata, T., Bouno, S., Koyanagi, A., & Miyake, T. (2021) · Journal of Perinatal Medicine · doi:10.1515/jpm-2020-0537 · Cited by 34
Fetal face as important indicator of fetal brain function
AboEllail, M. A. M., & Hata, T. (2017) · Journal of Perinatal Medicine · doi:10.1515/jpm-2016-0377 · Cited by 33
Current status of fetal neurodevelopmental assessment: Four‐dimensional ultrasound study
Hata, T. (2016) · Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research · doi:10.1111/jog.13099 · Cited by 27
Miyagi, Y., Hata, T., Bouno, S., Koyanagi, A., & Miyake, T. (2023) · International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics · doi:10.1002/ijgo.14569 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Kurjak, A., Miskovic, B., Stanojevic, M., Amiel-Tison, C., Ahmed, B., Azumendi, G., Vasilj, O., Andonotopo, W., Turudic, T., & Salihagic-Kadic, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Perinatal Medicine
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 2008-01-01
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 73-81
- ISSN
- 0300-5577 (ISSN-L)
- 1619-3997
- OpenAlex
- W2106478866
- Cited by
- 186
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: New scoring system for fetal neurobehavior assessed by three- and four-dimensional sonography. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1515/jpm.2008.007
- The paper
- Kurjak, A., Miskovic, B., Stanojevic, M., Amiel-Tison, C., Ahmed, B., Azumendi, G., Vasilj, O., Andonotopo, W., Turudic, T., & Salihagic-Kadic, A. (2008). New scoring system for fetal neurobehavior assessed by three- and four-dimensional sonography. Journal of Perinatal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm.2008.007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.