Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 360

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Neurodevelopmental fetal assessment using KANET scoring system in low and high risk pregnancies

Athanasiadis, Apostolos P., Mikos, Themistoklis, Tambakoudis, George P., Theodoridis, Theodoros D., Papastergiou, Maria, Assimakopoulos, Efstratios, Tarlatzis, Basil C.·2013·The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess and compare fetal behavior and neurodevelopment (KANET) between low and high risk pregnancies. METHODS: Prospective, comparative, cohort study. One hundred and fifty-two consecutive pregnant women presenting for routine 2nd trimester and 3rd trimester scan had four dimensional ultrasound examinations (4D US) in order to assess fetal behavior and neurodevelopment. This was achieved by the study of: (1) isolated head movements, (2) isolated hand movements, (3) isolated leg movements, (4) cranial sutures, (5) hand to face/head movements, (6) finger movements, (7) yawning - mouthing, (8) facial expressions, (9) isolated eye blinking, (10) "Gestalt" perception. According to the maternal background risk, the population of the study was classified in low risk pregnancies (n = 78) and high risk pregnancies (n = 74) with IUGR fetuses (n = 12), diabetes mellitus (n = 24), and pre-eclampsia (n = 38). RESULTS: The neurodevelopmental score was statistically significant higher in the low risk group compared to the high risk group (p < 0.0004). The diabetes subgroup score was statistically significantly higher compared to the IUGR and the pre-eclampsia subgroup (p = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The neurodevelopment fetal assessment by 4D ultrasound appears to be a feasible technique in the evaluation of high risk pregnancies. Further studies where any association between KANET score and neurological outcome of the childhood are warranted.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/14767058.2012.695824

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 11 references

Cited by

See all 360

Metadata

Authors
Athanasiadis, A. P., Mikos, T., Tambakoudis, G. P., Theodoridis, T. D., Papastergiou, M., Assimakopoulos, E., & Tarlatzis, B. C.
Venue
The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine
Published
2012-12-04
Volume
26
Issue
4
Pages
363-368
ISSN
  • 1476-4954 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-7058
OpenAlex
W2001666988
Cited by
360
References
11
FWCI
11.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neurodevelopmental fetal assessment using KANET scoring system in low and high risk pregnancies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3109/14767058.2012.695824
The paper
Athanasiadis, A. P., Mikos, T., Tambakoudis, G. P., Theodoridis, T. D., Papastergiou, M., Assimakopoulos, E., & Tarlatzis, B. C. (2013). Neurodevelopmental fetal assessment using KANET scoring system in low and high risk pregnancies. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.3109/14767058.2012.695824

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.