The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Stuffed toys and speech perception
Abstract
Previous research has shown that speech perception can be influenced by a speaker's social characteristics, including the expected dialect area of the speaker (Niedzielski, Journal of Language and Social Psychology 18: 62–85, 1999; Hay et al. The Linguistic Review 23: 351–379, 2006a). This article reports on an experiment designed to test to degree to which exposure to the concept of a region can also influence perception. In order to invoke the concept, we exposed participants, who were all speakers of New Zealand English, to either stuffed toy kangaroos and koalas (associated with Australia) or stuffed toy kiwis (associated with New Zealand). Participants then completed a perception task in which they matched natural vowels produced by a male New Zealander to vowels from a synthesized continuum which ranged from raised and fronted Australian-like tokens to lowered and centralized New Zealand-like tokens. Our results indicate that perception of the vowels shifted depending on which set of toys the participants had seen. This supports models of speech perception in which linguistic and nonlinguistic information are intricately entwined.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Converging evidence suggests that the initial moments of competition between lexical alternatives are constrained by multiple sources of information from different dimensions of the linguistic input (e.g., Dahan & Tanenhaus 2004; Kukona et al. 2011), including information external to the linguistic system, such as visually conveyed social information (Hay & Drager 2010; Staum Casasanto 200”
From Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science (2013) · cites this paper as Hay & Drager 2010
In the citing paper
“Experimental evidence shows that even subtle alterations to a stuffed toy presented to human subjects can shift their perception of vowel sounds [39].”
From Disability-First AI Dataset Annotation: Co-designing Stuttered Speech Annotation Guidelines with People Who Stutter (2026) · cites this paper as [39]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 17
- 10.1017/S004740450001037X · DOI
- 10.1515/ijsl.1984.46.49 · DOI
- 10.1159/000028438 · DOI
- Drager Katie, 2006, Te Reo, 48, 55
- 10.1016/j.wocn.2005.08.002 · DOI
- 10.1515/TLR.2006.014 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.wocn.2005.10.001 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.wocn.2005.08.004 · DOI
- 10.1006/jpho.1999.0100 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0954394506060078 · DOI
- Maclagan Margaret, 1982, The New Zealand Speech Therapists Journal, 37, 20
- 10.1017/S0954394500001095 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0954394507070020 · DOI
- 10.1177/0261927X99018001005 · DOI
- 10.1515/9783110197105.1.101 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.wocn.2006.06.003 · DOI
- 10.1080/13683500208667906 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 210
Talker specificity and the perception of grammatical variation
Squires, L. (2014) · doi:10.1080/01690965.2013.804193 · Cited by 10
“Other research, largely based in speech perception, has shown non-linguistic influences on language processing, ranging from talkerspecific effects (McLennan & Luce, 2005; Nygaard & Pisoni, 1998) to social stereotype effects (Hay & Drager, 2010; Hay, Warren, & Drager, 2006; Niedzielski, 1999).”
BackgroundExamining linguistic and experimenter biases through “non-native” versus “native” speech
Weissler, R. E., Drake, S., Kampf, K., Diantoro, C. A., Foster, K., Kirkpatrick, A., Preligera, I., Wesson, O., Wood, A., & Baese‐Berk, M. M. (2023) · Applied Psycholinguistics · doi:10.1017/s0142716423000115 · Cited by 8
“…about where a speaker is from is manipulated, listeners familiar with the region and accent perceive the same recorded vowel productions differently depending on the social or dialect group they believe the speaker to be a part of (Hay et al., 2006; Hay & Drager, 2010; Niedzielski, 1999).”
BackgroundDynamic sociolinguistic processing: Real-time changes in judgments of speaker competence
Levon, E., Sharma, D., & Ye, Y. (2022) · Language · doi:10.1353/lan.0.0273 · Cited by 9
“Niedzielski (1999), for example, demonstrates that listeners’ classifications of different variants of the onset of the mouth diphthong in English depend on whether listeners were primed to believe the speaker was Canadian or American (see also Hay & Drager 2010).”
BackgroundResultLaugh is in the air: An exploratory analysis of laughter during speed dating
Rathcke, T. V., & Fuchs, S. I. (2022) · Frontiers in Communication · doi:10.3389/fcomm.2022.909913 · Cited by 8
“(cf. Hay and Drager, 2010, see Figure 1).”
BackgroundRácz, P., Hay, J. B., & Pierrehumbert, J. B. (2020) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/lang.12402 · Cited by 5
“On the other hand, we know a lot about the ways in which the context is indexed in linguistic conventions and how this contributes to language variation and change (see e.g. Niedzielski 1999; Hay and Drager 2010; Bucholtz 1999).”
BackgroundSelf-citationLarraza, S., Samuel, A. G., & Oñederra, M. L. (2017) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17470218.2015.1124896 · Cited by 9
“…not only by the speakers’ own productions as well as by their linguistic experience, but also by more general factors like the items, contexts, social information, exposure to concepts, and so on, presented in the task (Hay & Drager, 2010; Hay, Nolan, & Drager, 2006; Hay, Warren, et al., 2006).”
BackgroundCognitive processing as a bridge between phonetic and social models of sound change
Harrington, J. M., & Stevens, M. (2014) · Laboratory Phonology Journal of the Association for Laboratory Phonology · doi:10.1515/lp-2014-0001 · Cited by 11
“Jannedy and Weirich take up this issue through their demonstration that perceptual categorizations in speech can be altered by exposure to visual primes (see also, e.g., Hay and Drager [2010] for a similar demonstration with respect to Australian/New Zealand English differences).”
Implementing the map task in applied linguistics research: What, how, and why
Berríos, J., Swain, A., & Fricke, M. (2023) · Research Methods in Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1016/j.rmal.2023.100081 · Cited by 8
“Since when does the Midwest have an accent?”
Carmichael, K. (2018) · English World-Wide A Journal of Varieties of English · doi:10.1075/eww.00008.car · Cited by 9
How the demographic makeup of our community influences speech perception.
Lev-Ari, S., & Peperkamp, S. (2016) · Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.4950811 · Cited by 8
“…were sounds that—like the trills in the present case—are not represented as phonologically distinct categories in participants’ phonological grammar, but belong to regional accents, or are merged with another category in participants’ own use (e.g., Hay and Drager, 2010; Koops et al., 2008).”
BackgroundSociolinguistic variables and cognition.
Thomas, E. (2011) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science · doi:10.1002/wcs.152 · Cited by 8
Gender and racial bias issues in a commercial “tone of voice” analysis system
Holliday, N. R., & Reed, P. E. (2025) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0314470 · Cited by 8
“Listeners from different backgrounds and with different linguistic experiences often interpret the same signal differently and their evaluation of any given speech-signal is context-dependent [12,13].”
Auditory free classification of gender diverse speakersa).
Merritt, B., Bent, T., Kilgore, R., & Eads, C. (2024) · Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/10.0024521 · Cited by 7
Listener Beliefs and Perceptual Learning: Differences Between Device and Human Guises
Zellou, G., Cohn, M., & Pycha, A. (2023) · Language · doi:10.1353/lan.2023.a914191 · Cited by 10
“Even seeing stuffed animals associated with different speaker groups (e.g. a kiwi cueing a New Zealand dialect) can shape speech perception (Hay & Drager 2010).”
BackgroundWarner, N. (2023) · J. Phonetics · doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2023.101275 · Cited by 7
Phonetic detail is used to predict a word's morphological composition
Clayards, M., Gaskell, M., & Hawkins, S. (2021) · J. Phonetics · doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2021.101055 · Cited by 7
Olson, D. J. (2020) · Languages · doi:10.3390/languages5040043 · Cited by 8
“…by the paradigm (e.g., Simonet 2014)) or imagined (i.e., visible or non-visible sociolinguistic cues (e.g., Babel and Russell 2015)), or is present in the physical environment that immediately surrounds participants (i.e., region-specific cues in the experimental setting (Hay and Drager 2010)).”
BackgroundInfluentialImplicit effects of regional cues on the interpretation of intonation by Corsican French listeners
Portes, C., & German, J. (2019) · doi:10.5334/labphon.162 · Cited by 7
“Crucially, in Hay and Drager (2010) these cues were implicit, in that they were not interpretable as characteristics of the speaker who produced the tokens, suggesting that the cues were acting on the perceptual system in a way that is both low-level and indirect, perhaps through the differential…”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialAccent-induced bias in linguistic transcriptions
Sloos, M., García, A. A., Andersson, A., & Neijmeijer, M. (2019) · Language sciences · doi:10.1016/j.langsci.2018.06.002 · Cited by 7
“Hay et al., 2006; Hay and Drager, 2010; Drager, 2010). These expectations are based on prior experience with that language variety. Similarly, listeners who believe they are listening to a speaker of a certain age or social class, adapt their perception to their expectations regarding the sociolectdwhether or not this…”
InfluentialSpeaker-Specific Cues Influence Semantic Disambiguation
Davies, C., Porretta, V., Koleva, K., & Klepousniotou, E. (2017) · Journal of Psycholinguistic Research · doi:10.1007/s10936-022-09852-0 · Cited by 7
“Relatedly, speech perception can be influenced by a speaker’s social background, including their expected dialect area (Niedzielski, 1999), where cues to a particular accent or region can influence the perception of phonemes (Hay et al., 2006; Hay & Drager, 2010).”
BackgroundHow to study spoken language understanding: a survey of neuroscientific methods
Rodd, J. M., & Davis, M. H. (2017) · Language Cognition and Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/23273798.2017.1323110 · Cited by 7
“Speech researchers should therefore keep in mind that, even in relatively low-level speech perception experiments, participants interpret the stimuli within a broader linguistic context in which the speaker is viewed as a social agent (Hay & Drager, 2010).”
BackgroundPerceptie van tussentaal in het gesproken Nederlands in Vlaanderen
Lybaert, C. (2014) · Nederlandse taalkunde · doi:10.5117/nedtaa2014.2.lyba · Cited by 8
A consumer guide to phonological evidence
van Oostendorp, M. (2013) · doi:10.7557/12.2477 · Cited by 7
“(For interesting views on problems in the methodology, see Hay and Drager (2010).)”
BackgroundVariation, gender and perception: the social meaning of Japanese linguistic variables
Sherwood, S., Shaw, J. A., Kawahara, S., Mailhammer, R., & Antoniou, M. (2023) · Linguistics · doi:10.1515/ling-2022-0149 · Cited by 3
“Recall that previous research has shown that the perception of variables can be a ff ected by social information about the speaker (Hay and Drager 2010; Hay et al. 2006a, 2006b; Koops et al. 2008; Niedzielski 1999; Strand 1999).”
BackgroundInfluentialAlternatives and Inferences in the Communication of Meaning
Rohde, H., & Kurumada, C. (2018) · The Psychology of learning and motivation/The psychology of learning and motivation · doi:10.1016/bs.plm.2018.08.012 · Cited by 6
“More generally, a growing literature targets the extent to which perceived social group membership affects language comprehension, including in phonological and syntactic processing (Drager, 2010a,b; Staum Casasanto, 2008; Hay et al., 2006; Hanuĺıková et al., 2012; Hay and Drager, 2010; Warren, 2017).”
BackgroundJin, X., Ernestus, M., & Baayen, R. (2025) · J. Phonetics · doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2026.101495 · Cited by 5
“…2018), morphosyntactic function (Plag et al., 2015; Lõo et al., 2023), information load (Bell et al., 2003; Aylett and Turk, 2004; Van Son and Pols, 2003), the many social factors studied in sociolinguistics (see, e.g., Hay and Drager, 2010), and effects of alcohol (Pisoni and Martin, 1989).”
Carmichael, K., & Reed, P. E. (2025) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009380874 · Cited by 26
Callesano, S., Delgado, R., Ma, W., Trybulec, E., & Reyes, G. D. (2025) · Frontiers in Communication · doi:10.3389/fcomm.2024.1490299 · Cited by 5
Social identity, precision and charity: when less precise speakers are held to stricter standard
Beltrama, A., & Schwarz, F. (2022) · Proceedings from Semantics and Linguistic Theory · doi:10.3765/salt.v1i0.5406 · Cited by 6
Phonetic alignment in English as a lingua franca: Coming together while splitting apart
Berry, G., & Ernestus, M. (2018) · Second language Research · doi:10.1177/0267658317737348 · Cited by 5
“…input (e.g. Davis et al., 2005; Kraljic and Samuel, 2005, 2007; Maye et al., 2008; Vroomen et al., 2007) and listener expectations about that input (e.g. Babel, 2012; Clopper, 2014; Hay and Drager, 2010; Hay et al., 2006; Kraljic and Samuel, 2005; Kraljic et al., 2008; Magnuson and Nusbaum, 2007).”
BackgroundPerception in a Variable but Structured World: The Case of Speech PerceptionPreprint
Kleinschmidt, D. (2017) · Thesis Commons (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31237/osf.io/zwves · Cited by 5
“This prediction, too, is borne out in empirical data (Hay & Drager, 2010; gender, Johnson, Strand, & D’Imperio, 1999; dialect, Niedzielski, 1999).”
Dialect Interference in Lexical Processing: Effects of Familiarity and Social Stereotypes
Clopper, C. G. (2016) · Phonetica · doi:10.1159/000446809 · Cited by 7
“The external activation of stereotyped dialect categories, through either explicit place labels or implicit cultural associations, has similarly been shown to affect performance in vowel perception tasks (Hay and Drager, 2010; Hay et al., 2006; Niedzielski, 1999).”
BackgroundTang, X., Li, J., & Wu, S. (2026) · Proceedings of the 2026 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3772318.3790405 · Cited by 4
“Experimental evidence shows that even subtle alterations to a stuffed toy presented to human subjects can shift their perception of vowel sounds [39].”
Montgomery, C., Vriesendorp, H., & Walker, G. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1613018 · Cited by 4
Social stereotypes affect imprecision resolution across different tasks
Beltrama, A., & Schwarz, F. (2024) · Semantics and Pragmatics · doi:10.3765/sp.17.10 · Cited by 7
“…is often bi-directional: comprehenders not only infer social information from the linguistic signal; they also adjust their perception of the linguistic signal depending on what information is available (Niedzielski 1999, Hay & Drager 2010, Babel 2012, Drager 2015, D’Onofrio 2015, 2018, 2019).”
Dialect change and language attitudes in Albania
Riverin-Coutlée, J., Kapia, E., & Gubian, M. (2024) · Language Variation and Change · doi:10.1017/s0954394524000103 · Cited by 4
“In addition, perception has been found to be biased by beliefs held by participants, including laboratory-induced beliefs about the speakers’ origin (e.g., Hay & Drager, 2010; Niedzielski, 1999).”
Regan, B., & Martinez, J. L. (2023) · Languages · doi:10.3390/languages8040266 · Cited by 4
Indexing Deficiency: Connecting Language Learning and Teaching to Evaluations of US Spanish
Licata, G. (2023) · Languages · doi:10.3390/languages8030204 · Cited by 3
The Potential Role of Talker Age in the Perception of Regional Accent
Shin, W.-B., Lee, H., Shin, J., & Holliday, J. (2020) · Language and Speech · doi:10.1177/0023830919861666 · Cited by 4
“…sheet, or drawing the listener’s attention to a stuffed animal representing a country, have proven sufficient to bias listeners in their perception of vowel variants (e.g., Hay & Drager, 2010; Hay, Nolan, & Drager, 2006; Niedzielski, 1999; although see Walker, Szakay, & Cox (2019) as well).”
BackgroundVariationist perspective(s) on interlocutor individual differences
Geeslin, K. L. (2020) · Language learning and language teaching · doi:10.1075/lllt.53.06gee · Cited by 10
Diphthongized (en) and the indexation of femininity and Paulistanity
Mendes, R. B. (2016) · doi:10.20396/cel.v58i3.8647300 · Cited by 4
Sound change, priming, salience : Producing and perceiving variation in Liverpool English
Juskan, M. (2018) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.1451308 · Cited by 4
Sloos, M. (2015) · doi:10.1075/rcl.13.1.03slo · Cited by 4
Socially prescriptive speech technologies: Linguistic, technical, and ethical issues
Holliday, N. R. (2025) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/10.0039685 · Cited by 2
Recognizing Uptalk: False Memory and Metalinguistic Commentary for a Sociolinguistic Feature
Stecker, A., & D’Onofrio, A. (2025) · Journal of Sociolinguistics · doi:10.1111/josl.12695 · Cited by 14
(Im)precise personae: The effect of socio-indexical information on semantic interpretation
Beltrama, A., & Schwarz, F. (2024) · Language in Society · doi:10.1017/s0047404524000320 · Cited by 5
“…keep track of different levels of speaker information – including both demographic features (e.g., Strand 1999; Niedzielski 1999; Hay et al. 2006; Hay 2009; Babel 2012; Drager 2015; Staum Casasanto 2008; Sumner et al. 2014) As to what specific motivation drives the observed interplay between…”
Listener Beliefs and Perceptual Learning: Differences Between Device and Human Guises
Zellou, G., Cohn, M., & Pycha, A. (2023) · Language · doi:10.1353/lan.0.a913403 · Cited by 11
“Even seeing stuffed animals associated with different speaker groups (e.g. a kiwi cueing a New Zealand dialect) can shape speech perception (Hay & Drager 2010).”
BackgroundThe Influence of Social Information on Speech Intelligibility within the Spanish Heritage Community
Staggs, C., Baese-Berk, M., & Nagle, C. (2022) · Languages · doi:10.3390/languages7030231 · Cited by 3
“Speech perception is heavily influenced by social factors that prompt assumptions about standard language, prestige, and social expectations of language production (Hay and Drager 2010; Kutlu 2020; Rubin 1992).”
BackgroundThe influence of Standard German on the vowels and diphthongs of West Central Bavarian
Wolfswinkler, K., & Harrington, J. M. (2021) · Journal of the International Phonetic Association · doi:10.1017/s0025100321000232 · Cited by 2
“Salience and its relationship to whether or not D1 shifts towards D2 may also be conditioned by the speaker’s attitude towards the dialect that is being acquired (Niedzielski 1999 for related perception studies, Walker 2014; see also Hay & Drager 2010, Jannedy & Weirich 2014). d.”
BackgroundDifferences in final /z/ realization in Southwest and Northern Virginia
Hargrave, R., Southall, A., & Walker, A. (2021) · American Speech · doi:10.1215/00031283-9308362 · Cited by 3
Compiling a Speech Corpus of German English: Rhoticity and the BATH Vowel
Jansen, S., & Langstrof, C. (2019) · doi:10.1017/9781108768924.012 · Cited by 3
Devlin, T. F., French, P., & Llamas, C. (2019) · Language Variation and Change · doi:10.1017/s0954394519000231 · Cited by 3
“Linking the pronunciation of a feature with the environment in which it is uttered—including topic of conversation—means that particular variants may associate more readily with certain situations (Goldinger, 1997; Hay & Drager, 2010).”
BackgroundSnap Judgment : Influences of Ethnicity on Evaluations of Foreign Language Speaking Proficiency
Gilchrist, C., & Chevrot, J.-P. (2017) · doi:10.4000/corela.4920 · Cited by 3
Perceptual learning of context-sensitive phonetic detail
Barden, K. (2011) · doi:10.17863/cam.16501 · Cited by 3
Salience and social meaning in speech production and perception
Alderton, R. (2020) · Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) · doi:10.17635/lancaster/thesis/938 · Cited by 4
“Early work in this paradigm found evidence for sociolinguistic priming effects (Johnson et al. 1999; Niedzielski 1999; Hay et al. 2006a, 2006b, 2009; Hay & Drager 2010; Drager 2011), although some recent studies have failed to replicate these findings (Squires 2013; Lawrence 2015; Juskan 2016;…”
ResultChapter 1. Sociolinguistic competence and the acquisition of speaking
Geeslin, K. L., Gudmestad, A., Kanwit, M., Linford, B., Long, A., Schmidt, L., & Solon, M. (2018) · AILA applied linguistics series · doi:10.1075/aals.17.01gee · Cited by 3
Catégorisations et représentations sociolinguistiques : les variétés stylistiques existent-elles ?
Buson, L., Chevrot, J.-P., Nardy, A., & Abouzaid, M. (2014) · SHS Web of Conferences · doi:10.1051/shsconf/20140801149 · Cited by 3
“…sociolinguistiques : voix évoquant un genre, photo mettant en évidence le groupe social du locuteur, évocation incidente d’une aire géographique par un emblème (Niedzielski, 1999 ; Johnson et al., 1999 ; Hay et al., 2006a, 2006b ; Hay & Drager, 2010 ; Staum Casasanto, 2009 ; Squires, 2011).”
BackgroundSocial variation of code-switching acceptability
Callesano, S., Delgado, R., Ma, W., & Trybulec, E. (2026) · International Journal of Bilingualism · doi:10.1177/13670069251404838 · Cited by 2
Jung, H., Oh, G. E., & Han, J.-I. (2025) · Lingua · doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2025.104038 · Cited by 2
Removing the Disguise: The Matched Guise Technique, Incongruity, and Listener Awareness
Laycock, K. B., & McGowan, K. B. (2025) · Journal of Sociolinguistics · doi:10.1111/josl.12700 · Cited by 2
Leung, A. H.-C., & Lee, P. C. (2023) · Language, Culture and Curriculum · doi:10.1080/07908318.2023.2285797 · Cited by 2
The Sociophonetics of Dublin English
Schulte, M. (2023) · Studies in Language Variation · doi:10.1075/silv.30 · Cited by 2
Perception and production of [voice] contrasts in Dutch word-initial plosives
Pfiffner, A. M. (2021) · doi:10.3765/plsa.v6i1.4976 · Cited by 2
Hayes-Harb, R., Barrios, S. L., & Tripp, A. (2021) · Journal of Second Language Pronunciation · doi:10.17605/osf.io/uw8y5 · Cited by 2
Prikhodkine, A., Saavedra, D. C., & Mamed, M. D. S. (2016) · doi:10.21427/d7d592 · Cited by 2
Variation sociophonétique et acquisition du langage : repères, débats, perspectives
Nardy, A., Chevrot, J.-P., & Barbu, S. (2015) · doi:10.3917/ls.151.0027 · Cited by 2
“…sociolinguistique (Campbell-Kibler, 2010; Labov et alii., 2011; Loudermilk et alii., 2011), des expérimentations fondées sur des méthodes d’amorçage (Hay & Drager, 2010; Squires, 2011; Staum Casasanto, 2009) permettraient de saisir, à différents âges, le degré d’automaticité et d’implicite des…”
BackgroundNew directions in speech perception
Smith, R. (2013) · doi:10.5040/9781472541895.ch-015 · Cited by 2
Phonetic perspectives on modelling information in the speech signal
Hawkins, S. (2011) · Sadhana · doi:10.1007/s12046-011-0038-0 · Cited by 1
“Hay & Drager (2010) demonstrate that phonetic decisions can even be influenced by non-linguistic experiences such as seeing national symbols.”
BackgroundFaire « local » avec un accent étranger : entre inclusion et minorisation
Prikhodkine, A. (2019) · Minorités linguistiques et société · doi:10.7202/1066525ar · Cited by 2
Osborne, D. (2026) · DELTA: Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada · doi:10.1590/1678-460x202642162587 · Cited by 1
Dialect-specificity and learners’ L2 perceptual resilience after study abroad
Schoonmaker-Gates, E. (2024) · Journal of Second Language Pronunciation · doi:10.1075/jslp.23004.sch · Cited by 1
Awareness and salience in language contact The case of Asturian Spanish
Barnes, S. (2023) · Lletres Asturianes · doi:10.17811/llaa.128.2023.75-96 · Cited by 1
“…shown that individuals can exhibit control over their language practices even if they are unaware that they are doing so, whether they are motivated by the social identity of their interlocutors (Bell, 1984) or by contextual information that triggers unconscious associations (Hay & Drager, 2010).”
BackgroundLewis, T. (2022) · Journal of Language and Discrimination · doi:10.1558/jld.21373 · Cited by 1
Formant detail needed for identifying, rating, and discriminating vowels in Wisconsin English
Jibson, J. (2022) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/10.0011539 · Cited by 1
The Bluegrass corpus: Audio-visual stimuli to investigate foreign accents
McGuffin, B., Incera, S., & White, H. (2021) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-021-01590-w · Cited by 1
“Furthermore, visual information does not need to include the faces of the speakers to influence speech perception (Hay & Drager, 2010).”
BackgroundThe voice of experience: Causal inference in phonotactic adaptation
Denby, T., & Goldrick, M. (2021) · Laboratory Phonology · doi:10.5334/labphon.267 · Cited by 1
“In speech perception research, modifying listener expectations about talker characteristics such as dialect, even in subtle ways, can have important consequences for speech perception (e.g., Hay & Drager, 2010).”
BackgroundBiasibetti, A. P. C. D. S. (2020) · Journal of Portuguese Linguistics · doi:10.5334/jpl.233 · Cited by 1
“This fact reinforces the findings of Strand & Johnson (1996), Niedzielski (1999), Hay et al. (2006), Hay & Drager (2010), and Munson (2011) about how stereotypes may distort phonetic perception.”
BackgroundResultHughes, R. (2020) · Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America · doi:10.3765/plsa.v5i1.4729 · Cited by 1
The role of social cues in the perception of final vowel contrasts in Asturian Spanish
Barnes, S. (2019) · Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone linguistics · doi:10.1075/ihll.21.02bar · Cited by 2
Same stimuli, same subjects, different perception
Sloos, M., & Wang, L. (2018) · Asia-Pacific Language Variation · doi:10.1075/aplv.17006.slo · Cited by 1
Toplumsesbilgisel Açıdan Türkçede Perde Genişliğinin Konuşma Algısı ve Belirtisellik
Yağlı, E. (2019) · Hacettepe Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi · doi:10.32600/huefd.433571 · Cited by 1
Sloos, M., & McKeown, D. (2015) · i-Perception · doi:10.1177/2041669515607153 · Cited by 2
Introduction to the Special Issue on Archiving Sociolinguistic Data
Yaeger-Dror, M., & Cieri, C. (2014) · Language and Linguistics Compass · doi:10.1111/lnc3.12120 · Cited by 1
“Towhat extent should we control for or document the identity of the interviewer, setting, and visual cues like those shown to be relevant in Hay & Drager (2010).”
BackgroundNew horizons in sociophonetic variation and change
Hilton, N., Gooskens, C., Schüppert, A., & Lenz, A. (2012) · doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2012.02.004 · Cited by 1
“…studies investigating the construction of social meaning of language and how fine phonetic detail influence social categorisation in perception (e.g. Thomas et al., 2010) or, vice versa, how social detail influences phonetic perception (e.g. Hay and Drager, 2010) have been particularly prominent.”
BackgroundTatman, R. (2017) · CMCL@EACL · doi:10.18653/v1/w17-0704 · Cited by 1
“It is well established that listeners do learn to perceive new language varieties (Fox, 1974; Hay et al., 2010; Sumner, 2011), and that they use world knowledge and their social beliefs about speakers to do so (Niedzielski, 1999; Johnson et al., 1999; Hay and Drager, 2010).”
BackgroundExplicit and Implicit Methods in Quantitative Analyses of Sociophonetic Variation
Mack, S. (2013) · doi:10.1515/shll-2013-1145 · Cited by 1
“(See also Hay & Drager 2010, Hay, Nolan & Drager 2006 and Hay, Warren & Drager 2006 inter alia).”
BackgroundPhonology & the Interpretation of Fine Phonetic Detail in Berlin German
Jannedy, S., & Weirich, M. (2012) · Interspeech · doi:10.21437/interspeech.2012-38 · Cited by 1
“Phonological generalization over phonetic input is dependent on associative information: perceptual divergence is found within the confines of a single large urban area [2,3,4].”
BackgroundCombating linguicide through pronunciation and voice reclamation: shadowing as an identity practice
Zanaty, D. G., Alshammari, B. S., Alfraidi, K., & Karam, K. (2026) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-026-09337-8
“Recordings were made under identical conditions and analyzed in Praat (Boersma and Weenink, 2023) by two trained raters following sociophonetic protocols (Foulkes and Docherty, 2006; Hay and Drager, 2010).”
Variable bilingual experiences and their influence on a contextualized acceptability judgment task
Delgado, R., Callesano, S., & Ma, W. (2026) · Applied Psycholinguistics · doi:10.1017/s0142716426100873
“Drawing on prior studies that incorporate extralinguistic cues in experimental materials (e.g., Callesano & Carter, 2019; Carter & Callesano, 2018; Hay & Drager, 2010; Niedzielski, 1999), ostensible source labels were included for half of both the grammatical and ungrammatical items.”
Sounding Black, looking White: Perceptions of racial identity in pop music
Killam, A. (2026) · Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America · doi:10.3765/plsa.v11i1.6071
“Linguistic expectations concerning speaker identity are shaped by both auditory (e.g., Niedzielski, 1999) and visual cues (e.g., Hay & Drager 2010).”
Phonetic outcomes in Mandarin–English code-switching: exploring the role of orthographic depth
Cheng, Y.-F., & Olson, D. J. (2026) · Phonetica: International Journal of Phonetic Science · doi:10.1515/phon-2024-0048
“With respect to non-linguistic variables, for example, experiments exposing New Zealand English speakers to symbols associated with Australia (i.e., stu ff ed toy kangaroos) or New Zealand (i.e., stu ff ed toy kiwi birds) showed that their vowel perception shifted accordingly (Hay and Drager 2010).”
Sypiańska, J., & Cal, Z. (2026) · Brain Science · doi:10.3390/brainsci16030280
“…which emphasize that occupational complexity can enhance efficiency, attentional control, and flexible cognitive strategies in later life [33–35] and with research suggesting that listener experience and expertise shape perceptual and evaluative norms independently of objective performance [18,39].”
Social expectations modulate vowel perception in Korean dialect convergence
Jung, H., Oh, G. E., & Han, J.-I. (2026) · Linguistics Vanguard · doi:10.1515/lingvan-2025-0131
“This type of label-based perceptual shift has since been replicated across speaker attributes such as gender, region, and ethnicity (Hay and Drager 2010; Strand and Johnson 1996), supporting the view that dialectal variation may be lexically speci fi ed and retrieved via abstract social labels.”
Listener perceptions of word-final /l/: Effects of listener dialect.
Chung, H., & Schellinger, S. K. (2025) · Journal of Communication Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jcomdis.2025.106610
Carmichael, K., & D’Onofrio, A. (2025) · Journal of Linguistic Geography · doi:10.1017/jlg.2026.10008
“Listeners use social information about speakers ’ regional origin in perception, both when categorizing speech sounds (Niedzielski, 1999; Hay & Drager, 2010) and when socially evaluating speakers (Campbell-Kibler, 2009, 2011; Carmichael, 2016, 2018).”
Women of All Ages Lead Tonogenesis in Afrikaans
Pfiffner, A. M. (2025) · Journal Of Germanic Linguistics · doi:10.1017/s1470542725100056
“It is well known that speech perception is influenced by social characteristics (Niedzielski 1999, Hay et al. 2006, Hay & Drager 2010), both the social characteristics of a listener and perceived characteristics of a speaker (Hay et al. 2006).”
Listening for Region: Phonetic Cue Sensitivity and Sociolinguistic Development in L2 Spanish
Schmidt, L. B. (2025) · Languages · doi:10.3390/languages10080198
“It has even been shown that social attitudes may go so far as to shape perception of a particular variant (Drager, 2005; Hay & Drager, 2010; Niedzielski, 1999).”
Language Attitudes and Stereotypes Condition the Processing of Contact-Induced Linguistic Variants
Barnes, S., & Chappell, W. (2025) · Language and Speech · doi:10.1177/00238309251353529
“Finally, Walker et al. (2019) replicated the Hay and Drager (2010) study in an Australian context, employing stuffed animals to prime listener responses.”
Metadata
- Authors
- Hay, J., & Drager, K.
- Affiliations
- University of Canterbury (NZ)
- Venue
- Linguistics
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 2010-01
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 4
- ISSN
- 0024-3949 (ISSN-L)
- 1613-396X
- OpenAlex
- W2017354652
- Cited by
- 368
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 83 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 63.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Linguistics (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Linguistic Variation and Morphology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
- Keywords
- speech perception, dialect perception, regional identity, concept activation, stuffed toys, vowel perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review