Cited by 6Wildlife Ecology and ConservationMarine animal studies overviewComparative Animal Anatomy Studies

Quelques observations sur un hippopotame pygmée nouveau-né (Choeropsis liberiensis) en forêt de Taï, Côte d’Ivoire

GALAT-LUONG, Anh·1981·Mammalia

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/mamm.1981.45.1.39

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Very young C. liberiensis calves are hidden in a shallow pool or among the vegetation while the mother forages; she will visit the calf several times per day to allow it to nurse.

    “Very young calves are hidden in a shallow pool or among the vegetation while the mother forages; she will visit the calf several times per day to allow it to nurse (Galat-Luong 1981).”

    From Choeropsis liberiensis (Artiodactyla: Hippopotamidae) (2019) · cites this paper as Galat-Luong 1981

Cites

Still being checked.

Authors
GALAT-LUONG, A.
Venue
Mammalia
Published
1981
Volume
45
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 0025-1461 (ISSN-L)
  • 1864-1547
OpenAlex
W1971638359
Cited by
6
References
0
Citations by year
2019: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.66
Type
journal article
Language
fr
Open access
closed
Locations
Mammalia (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Marine animal studies overview
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Comparative Animal Anatomy Studies
Keywords
Choeropsis liberiensis, pygmy hippopotamus, neonates, infant behavior, Taï Forest, forest habitat, mammal observations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review