Cited by 192Advancements in Transdermal Drug DeliveryAdvanced Drug Delivery SystemsDermatology and Skin Diseases

Topical drug delivery systems: a patent review

Singh Malik, Deepinder, Mital, Neeraj, Kaur, Gurpreet·2016·Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Patents

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Topical administration is the favored route for local delivery of therapeutic agents due to its convenience and affordability. The specific challenge of designing a therapeutic system is to achieve an optimal concentration of a certain drug at its site of action for an appropriate duration. AREAS COVERED: This review summarizes innovations from the past 3 years (2012-2015) in the field of topical drug delivery for the treatment of local infections of the vagina, nose, eye and skin. The review also throws some light on the anatomy and physiology of these organs and their various defensive barriers which affect the delivery of drugs administered topically. EXPERT OPINION: Topical administration has been gaining attention over the last few years. However, conventional topical drug delivery systems suffer from drawbacks such as poor retention and low bioavailability. The successful formulation of topical delivery products requires the careful manipulation of defensive barriers and selection of a soluble drug carrier. Extensive research is required to develop newer topical drug delivery systems aiming either to improve the efficacy or to reduce side effects compared to current patented systems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1517/13543776.2016.1131267

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Singh Malik, D., Mital, N., & Kaur, G.
Affiliations
Punjabi University (IN)
Corresponding author
Kaur, Gurpreet
Venue
Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Patents
Published
2016-01-08
Volume
26
Issue
2
Pages
213-228
ISSN
  • 1354-3776 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-7674
OpenAlex
W2210405447
Cited by
192
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 10
FWCI
0.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Patents (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology (F. No. SB/FT/LS-177/2012)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advanced Drug Delivery Systems
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatology and Skin Diseases
Keywords
topical drug delivery, topical formulation, vaginal infection, intranasal drug delivery, ocular drug delivery, dermal drug delivery, drug retention, bioavailability, skin barrier, ocular barriers, drug carriers, patents
MeSH terms
Administration, Topical, Animals, Biological Availability, Chemistry, Pharmaceutical, Drug Carriers, Pharmaceutical Preparations, Humans, Patents as Topic, Drug Design, Drug Delivery Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review