Cited by 37Sleep and related disordersCircadian rhythm and melatoninPharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes

Benzodiazepine discontinuation with prolonged-release melatonin: hints from a German longitudinal prescription database

Kunz, Dieter, Bineau, Sébastien, Maman, Khaled, Milea, Dominique, Toumi, Mondher·2012·Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Prolonged-release (PR) melatonin is approved in Europe for the treatment of insomnia in patients aged 55 years and above. The objective of the study was to describe its prescription patterns and its impact on hypnotics use in routine clinical practice. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study analyzing PR melatonin prescription data from a German longitudinal database (IMS(®) Disease Analyzer). All patients initiating PR melatonin over the 10 months after approval (April 2008 - February 2009) were included. Patients were classified according to their use of hypnotic benzodiazepines or benzodiazepine-like drugs (BZD/Z) in the 3-month period before and after PR melatonin initiation. RESULTS: Of the 512 eligible patients, 380 (74%) were aged ≥ 55 years, 344 (67%) women and 112 (22%) previous BZD/Z users. Most of the latter (79/99, 79.8%) had used BZD/Z for at least 180 days. Approximately one-third (35/112, 31%) discontinued BZD/Z after PR melatonin initiation, and the BZD/Z discontinuation rate was higher in patients receiving two or three PR melatonin prescriptions than in patients receiving only one prescription (10/24 = 42% vs 25/88 = 28%, p = 0.21). Of the 400 patients without prior BZD/Z use, 39 (10%) received BZD/Z during the follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the observed 31% discontinuation rate, PR melatonin may help to facilitate BZD/Z discontinuation in older insomniacs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1517/14656566.2012.638284

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kunz, D., Bineau, S., Maman, K., Milea, D., & Toumi, M.
Affiliations
  • St. Hedwig-Krankenhaus (DE)
  • Creativ-Ceutical (France) (FR)
  • Lyon 1 Université (FR)
Venue
Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy
Published
2011-11-22
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
9-16
ISSN
  • 1465-6566 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-7666
OpenAlex
W2165322847
Cited by
37
References
23
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 8
FWCI
6.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Keywords
prolonged-release melatonin, benzodiazepine discontinuation, benzodiazepine-like drugs, insomnia, older adults, drug substitution
MeSH terms
Aged, Benzodiazepines, Delayed-Action Preparations, Female, Germany, Humans, Hypnotics and Sedatives, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Male, Melatonin, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review