The DOI matches its Crossref record; 86 of the 86 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Emerging trends and new developments in regenerative medicine: a scientometric update (2000 – 2014)
Open accessAbstract
INTRODUCTION: Our previous scientometric review of regenerative medicine provides a snapshot of the fast-growing field up to the end of 2011. The new review identifies emerging trends and new developments appearing in the literature of regenerative medicine based on relevant articles and reviews published between 2000 and the first month of 2014. AREAS COVERED: Multiple datasets of publications relevant to regenerative medicine are constructed through topic search and citation expansion to ensure adequate coverage of the field. Networks of co-cited references representing the literature of regenerative medicine are constructed and visualized based on a combined dataset of 71,393 articles published between 2000 and 2014. Structural and temporal dynamics are identified in terms of most active topical areas and cited references. New developments are identified in terms of newly emerged clusters and research areas. Disciplinary-level patterns are visualized in dual-map overlays. EXPERT OPINION: While research in induced pluripotent stem cells remains the most prominent area in the field of regenerative medicine, research related to clinical and therapeutic applications in regenerative medicine has experienced a considerable growth. In addition, clinical and therapeutic developments in regenerative medicine have demonstrated profound connections with the induced pluripotent stem cell research and stem cell research in general. A rapid adaptation of graphene-based nanomaterials in regenerative medicine is evident. Both basic research represented by stem cell research and application-oriented research typically found in tissue engineering are now increasingly integrated in the scientometric landscape of regenerative medicine. Tissue engineering is an interdisciplinary field in its own right. Advances in multiple disciplines such as stem cell research and graphene research have strengthened the connections between tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
4 retracted
RETRACTED ARTICLE: Pluripotency of mesenchymal stem cells derived from adult marrow
Jiang, Y., Jahagirdar, B. N., Reinhardt, R. L., Schwartz, R. E., Keene, C. D., Ortiz-Gonzalez, X. R., Reyes, M., Lenvik, T., Lund, T., Blackstad, M., et al. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature00870 · Cited by 5,518
RetractedRETRACTED: Clinical transplantation of a tissue-engineered airway
Macchiarini, P., Jungebluth, P., Go, T., Asnaghi, M. A., Rees, L. E., Cogan, T. A., Dodson, A., Martorell, J., Bellini, S., Parnigotto, P. P., et al. (2008) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(08)61598-6 · Cited by 1,433
RetractedBolli, R., Chugh, A. R., D'Amario, D., Loughran, J. H., Stoddard, M. F., Ikram, S., Beache, G. M., Wagner, S. G., Leri, A., Hosoda, T., et al. (2011) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(11)61590-0 · Cited by 1,288
RetractedRETRACTED ARTICLE: Stimulus-triggered fate conversion of somatic cells into pluripotency
Obokata, H., Wakayama, T., Sasai, Y., Kojima, K., Vacanti, M. P., Niwa, H., Yamato, M., & Vacanti, C. A. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12968 · Cited by 260
RetractedHallmarks of Cancer: The Next Generation
Hanahan, D., & Weinberg, R. A. (2011) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013 · Cited by 66,590
Takahashi, K., & Yamanaka, S. (2006) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.07.024 · Cited by 26,673
Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells
Pittenger, M. F., Mackay, A. M., Beck, S. C., Jaiswal, R. K., Douglas, R., Mosca, J. D., Moorman, M. A., Simonetti, D. W., Craig, S., & Marshak, D. R. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.284.5411.143 · Cited by 21,052
Induction of Pluripotent Stem Cells from Adult Human Fibroblasts by Defined Factors
Takahashi, K., Tanabe, K., Ohnuki, M., Narita, M., Ichisaka, T., Tomoda, K., & Yamanaka, S. (2007) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2007.11.019 · Cited by 20,221
Stem cells, cancer, and cancer stem cells
Reya, T., Morrison, S. J., Clarke, M. F., & Weissman, I. L. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35102167 · Cited by 9,738
Establishment in culture of pluripotential cells from mouse embryos
Evans, M. J., & Kaufman, M. H. (1981) · Nature · doi:10.1038/292154a0 · Cited by 8,607
Cited by
Science Mapping: A Systematic Review of the Literature
Chen, C. (2017) · Journal of Data and Information Science · doi:10.1515/jdis-2017-0006 · Cited by 1,925
Self-citationBibliometric analysis: The main steps
Passas, I. (2024) · Encyclopedia · doi:10.3390/encyclopedia4020065 · Cited by 842
Global trends and future prospects of e-waste research: a bibliometric analysis
Gao, Y., Ge, L., Shi, S., Sun, Y., Liu, M., Wang, B., Shang, Y., Wu, J., & Tian, J. (2019) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-019-05071-8 · Cited by 205
Wu, H., Zhou, Y., Wang, Y., Tong, L., Wang, F., Song, S., Xu, L., Liu, B., Yan, H., & Sun, Z. (2021) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2021.717192 · Cited by 90
Global Trends on Food Security Research: A Bibliometric Analysis
Xie, H., Wen, Y., Choi, Y., & Zhang, X. (2021) · Land · doi:10.3390/land10020119 · Cited by 90
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, C., Dubin, R., & Kim, M. C.
- Venue
- Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2014-07-31
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1295-1317
- ISSN
- 1471-2598 (ISSN-L)
- 1744-7682
- OpenAlex
- W2075961646
- Cited by
- 837
- References
- 86
- FWCI
- 10.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Emerging trends and new developments in regenerative medicine: a scientometric update (2000 – 2014). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1517/14712598.2014.920813
- The paper
- Chen, C., Dubin, R., & Kim, M. C. (2014). Emerging trends and new developments in regenerative medicine: a scientometric update (2000 – 2014). Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy. https://doi.org/10.1517/14712598.2014.920813
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
