Cited by 70Acne and Rosacea Treatments and EffectsDermatology and Skin DiseasesDermatologic Treatments and Research

Side effects of common acne treatments

Tripathi, Shivani V, Gustafson, Cheryl J, Huang, Karen E, Feldman, Steven R·2013·Expert Opinion on Drug Safety

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: A variety of acne treatments exist, including topical benzoyl peroxide, topical retinoids, topical antibiotics, oral antibiotics, hormonal therapy, isotretinoin, and procedural therapies, such as light and laser therapies. Although each of these treatment modalities confer various benefits for the management of acne, it is important for healthcare providers to be aware of their potential side effects, including ones that are most common and most serious, so that these medications can be prescribed in a safe manner. AREAS COVERED: A systematic literature review was performed to identify publications discussing the side effects of the different treatment modalities used for acne vulgaris. Acne treatments reviewed included benzoyl peroxide gel, topical retinoids, topical antibiotics, oral antibiotics, hormonal therapy, isotretinoin, and light/laser treatments. EXPERT OPINION: A comprehensive overview of acne treatments' side effects is imperative for healthcare professionals and scientists working with and prescribing acne treatments. Side effects to be aware of when prescribing range from local irritation with topical treatments to systemic side effects including liver function abnormalities and teratogenic side effects. The best available options are those that address acne severity while minimizing side effects for the patient. Consequently, personalized medicine must be strongly emphasized to healthcare providers developing patients' treatment plans.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1517/14740338.2013.740456

Cites

95 of 95 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 96 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tripathi, S. V., Gustafson, C. J., Huang, K. E., & Feldman, S. R.
Affiliations
  • Wake Forest University Health Sciences (US)
  • Wake Forest University (US)
Venue
Expert Opinion on Drug Safety
Published
2012-11-20
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
39-51
ISSN
  • 1474-0338 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-764X
OpenAlex
W2135486797
Cited by
70
References
96
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6
FWCI
0.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Expert Opinion on Drug Safety (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Acne and Rosacea Treatments and Effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatology and Skin Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatologic Treatments and Research
Keywords
acne, benzoyl peroxide, topical retinoids, topical antibiotics, oral antibiotics, hormone therapy, isotretinoin, liver dysfunction, teratogenicity, drug safety, personalized medicine
MeSH terms
Acne Vulgaris, Dermatologic Agents, Drug Administration Routes, Humans, Phototherapy, Risk Factors, Treatment Outcome, Risk Assessment, Patient Selection, Low-Level Light Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review