Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 174

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Carbon nanotubes part II: a remarkable carrier for drug and gene delivery

Open access
Karimi, Mahdi, Solati, Navid, Ghasemi, Amir, Estiar, Mehrdad Asghari, Hashemkhani, Mahshid, Kiani, Parnian, Mohamed, Elmira, Saeidi, Ahad, Taheri, Mahdiar, Avci, Pinar, Aref, Amir R, Amiri, Mohammad, Baniasadi, Fazel, Hamblin, Michael R·2015·Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Carbon nanotubes (CNT) have recently been studied as novel and versatile drug and gene delivery vehicles. When CNT are suitably functionalized, they can interact with various cell types and are taken up by endocytosis. AREAS COVERED: Anti-cancer drugs cisplatin and doxorubicin have been delivered by CNT, as well as methotrexate, taxol and gemcitabine. The delivery of the antifungal compound amphotericin B and the oral administration of erythropoietin have both been assisted using CNT. Frequently, targeting moieties such as folic acid, epidermal growth factor or various antibodies are attached to the CNT-drug nanovehicle. Different kinds of functionalization (e.g., polycations) have been used to allow CNT to act as gene delivery vectors. Plasmid DNA, small interfering RNA and micro-RNA have all been delivered by CNT vehicles. Significant concerns are raised about the nanotoxicology of the CNT and their potentially damaging effects on the environment. EXPERT OPINION: CNT-mediated drug delivery has been studied for over a decade, and both in vitro and in vivo studies have been reported. The future success of CNTs as vectors in vivo and in clinical application will depend on achievement of efficacious therapy with minimal adverse effects and avoidance of possible toxic and environmentally damaging effects.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1517/17425247.2015.1004309

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 174

Metadata

Authors
Karimi, M., Solati, N., Ghasemi, A., Estiar, M. A., Hashemkhani, M., Kiani, P., Mohamed, E., Saeidi, A., Taheri, M., Avci, P., Aref, A. R., Amiri, M., Baniasadi, F., & Hamblin, M. R.
Venue
Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery
Published
2015-01-22
Volume
12
Issue
7
Pages
1089-1105
ISSN
  • 1742-5247 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-7593
OpenAlex
W2112709886
Cited by
174
References
2
FWCI
8.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Carbon nanotubes part II: a remarkable carrier for drug and gene delivery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1517/17425247.2015.1004309
The paper
Karimi, M., Solati, N., Ghasemi, A., Estiar, M. A., Hashemkhani, M., Kiani, P., Mohamed, E., Saeidi, A., Taheri, M., Avci, P., Aref, A. R., Amiri, M., Baniasadi, F., & Hamblin, M. R. (2015). Carbon nanotubes part II: a remarkable carrier for drug and gene delivery. Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery. https://doi.org/10.1517/17425247.2015.1004309

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.