The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The challenge of selecting protein kinase assays for lead discovery optimization
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Protein kinases represent one of the most promising groups of drug targets owing to their involvement in such pathological conditions as cancer, inflammatory diseases, neural disorders, and metabolism problems. In the last few years, numerous pharmaceutical and biotech companies have established kinase high-throughput screening (HTS) programs, and the reagent and service industries for kinase assay platforms, kits, and profiling services have begun to thrive. OBJECTIVE: The plethora of different assay formats available today poses a great challenge to scientists who want to select a technology that will be cost efficient, convenient to use, and have low false positive and false negative rates. METHODS: In the current review, we summarize the most commonly used kinase assay methods in the drug discovery process, present the advantages and disadvantages of each of these methods, and discuss the challenges of discovering kinase inhibitors by using these technologies. CONCLUSIONS: The decision of selecting the assay formats for HTS or service platform for profiling should take into account not only the final goals of the screens but also the limitation of resources.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The evolution of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinases as regulators of growth and metabolism
Engelman, J. A., Luo, J., & Cantley, L. C. (2006) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg1879 · Cited by 3,330
Hopkins, A. L., & Groom, C. R. (2002) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd892 · Cited by 3,305
A quantitative analysis of kinase inhibitor selectivity
Karaman, M. W., Herrgard, S., Treiber, D. K., Gallant, P., Atteridge, C. E., Campbell, B. T., Chan, K. W., Ciceri, P., Davis, M. I., Edeen, P. T., et al. (2008) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1358 · Cited by 2,466
Dasatinib in imatinib-resistant Philadelphia chromosome-positive leukemias
Talpaz, M., Shah, N. P., Kantarjian, H., Donato, N., Nicoll, J., Paquette, R., Cortes, J., O'Brien, S., Nicaise, C., Bleickardt, E., et al. (2006) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa055229 · Cited by 1,760
Cited by
Comprehensive assay of kinase catalytic activity reveals features of kinase inhibitor selectivity
Anastassiadis, T., Deacon, S. W., Devarajan, K., Ma, H., & Peterson, J. R. (2011) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2017 · Cited by 919
Self-citationPhosphatase-Coupled Universal Kinase Assay and Kinetics for First-Order-Rate Coupling Reaction
Wu, Z. L. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0023172 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Ma, H., Deacon, S., & Horiuchi, K.
- Venue
- Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery
- Publisher
- Informa Healthcare
- Published
- 2008-05-22
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 607-621
- ISSN
- 1746-0441 (ISSN-L)
- 1746-045X
- OpenAlex
- W2126893023
- Cited by
- 197
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 9.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The challenge of selecting protein kinase assays for lead discovery optimization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1517/17460441.3.6.607
- The paper
- Ma, H., Deacon, S., & Horiuchi, K. (2008). The challenge of selecting protein kinase assays for lead discovery optimization. Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery. https://doi.org/10.1517/17460441.3.6.607
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.