The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Eye Activity Correlates of Workload during a Visuospatial Memory Task
Abstract
Changes in six measures of eye activity were assessed as a function of task workload in a target identification memory task. Eleven participants completed four 2hr blocks of a mock anti-air-warfare task, in which they were required to examine and remember target classifications (friend/enemy) for subsequent prosecution (fire upon/allow to pass), while targets moved steadily toward two centrally located ship icons. Target density served as the task workload variable; between one and nine targets were simultaneously present on the display. For each participant, moving estimates of blink frequency and duration, fixation frequency and dwell time, saccadic extent, and mean pupil diameter, integrated over periods of 10 to 20 s, demonstrated systematic changes as a function of target density. Nonlinear regression analyses found blink frequency, fixation frequency, and pupil diameter to be the most predictive variables relating eye activity to target density Participant-specific artificial neural network models, developed through training on two or three sessions and subsequently tested on a different session from the same participant, correlated well with actual target density levels (mean R = 0.66). Results indicate that moving mean estimation and artificial neural network techniques enable information from multiple eye measures to be combined to produce reliable near-real-time indicators of workload in some visuospatial tasks. Potential applications include the monitoring of visual activity of system operators for indications of visual workload and scanning efficiency.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Physiological workload reactions to increasing levels of task difficulty
VELTMAN, J. A., & GAILLARD, A. W. K. (1998) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/001401398186829 · Cited by 433 · cited 2×
“Under high target density conditions, blink frequency, fixation frequency, and saccadic extent demonstrated patterns indicative of higher visual processing load (Brookings et al., 1996; Hankins & Wilson, 1998; Veltman & Gaillard, 1998).”
BackgroundPsychophysiology and adaptive automation
Byrne, E. A., & Parasuraman, R. (1996) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/0301-0511(95)05161-9 · Cited by 360 · cited 1×
“Previous research has established that truly adaptive systems will require information on the human operator’s workload levels in real-time, as it is difficult to predict actual workload based on modeled estimates alone (Byrne & Parasuraman, 1996).”
Background
Cited by
Klingner, J., Tversky, B., & Hanrahan, P. (2011) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01069.x · Cited by 255
Using task-induced pupil diameter and blink rate to infer cognitive load.
Chen, S., & Epps, J. (2014) · Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/07370024.2014.892428 · Cited by 200
A Model Relating Pupil Diameter to Mental Workload and Lighting Conditions
Pfleging, B., Fekety, D. K., Schmidt, A., & Kun, A. L. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2858036.2858117 · Cited by 179
Eye activity as a measure of human mental effort in HCI
Chen, S., Epps, J., Ruiz, N., & Chen, F. (2011) · Proceedings of the 16th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces · doi:10.1145/1943403.1943454 · Cited by 174
Overview of the DARPA Augmented Cognition Technical Integration Experiment
St. John, M., Kobus, D. A., Morrison, J. G., & Schmorrow, D. (2004) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1207/s15327590ijhc1702_2 · Cited by 124
Background sound impairs interruption recovery in dynamic task situations: procedural conflict?
Hodgetts, H. M., Vachon, F., & Tremblay, S. (2014) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.2952 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- Van Orden, K. F., Limbert, W., Makeig, S., & Jung, T.-P.
- Venue
- Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2001-03
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 111-121
- ISSN
- 0018-7208 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-8181
- OpenAlex
- W1973613120
- Cited by
- 293
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.