Cited by 231Muscle activation and electromyography studiesSports Performance and TrainingLower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Effect of Back Squat Depth on the EMG Activity of 4 Superficial Hip and Thigh Muscles

CATERISANO, ANTHONY, MOSS, RAYMOND E, PELLINGER, THOMAS K., WOODRUFF, KATHERINE, LEWIS, VICTOR C., BOOTH, WALTER, KHADRA, TARICK·2002·Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to measure the relative contributions of 4 hip and thigh muscles while performing squats at 3 depths. Ten experienced lifters performed randomized trials of squats at partial, parallel, and full depths, using 100-125% of body weight as resistance. Electromyographic (EMG) surface electrodes were placed on the vastus medialis (VMO), the vastus lateralis, (VL), the biceps femoris (BF), and the gluteus maximus (GM). EMG data were quantified by integration and expressed as a percentage of the total electrical activity of the 4 muscles. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey post hoc tests indicated a significant difference (p < 0.001*, p = 0.056**) in the relative contribution of the GM during the concentric phases among the partial- (16.9%*), parallel- (28.0%**), and full-depth (35.4%*) squats. There were no significant differences between the relative contributions of the BF, the VMO, and the VL at different squatting depths during this phase. The results suggest that the GM, rather than the BF, the VMO, or the VL, becomes more active in concentric contraction as squat depth increases.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1519/00124278-200208000-00014

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Moving the trunk from a more upright position to a more forward position shifts the resultant ground reaction force vector anteriorly, resulting in an increase in the hip flexion moment while simultaneously decreasing the knee flexion moment during squatting.

    “Moving the trunk from a more upright position (Figure 1A) to more forward position (Figure 1B) shifts the resultant ground reaction force vector anteriorly, resulting in an increase in the hip flexion moment while simultaneously decreasing the knee flexion moment.11”
  • A trunk-tibia angle of -8° resulted in a hip/knee flexion moment ratio equal to 1.0.

    “The regression model indicated that a trunk-tibia angle of -8° resulted in a hip/knee flexion moment ratio equal to 1.0.11”
  • The relative demand of the hip and knee extensors during squatting could be predicted based on the relative inclination of the trunk and tibia.

    “Evidence in support of this premise is provided by Barrack et al., who demonstrated that the relative demand of the hip and knee extensors during squatting could be predicted based on the relative inclination of the trunk and tibia.11”
  • When tibia inclination exceeded trunk inclination (by at least 8°), the squat became knee extensor biased (hip/knee flexion moment ratio < 1.0).

    “Conversely, when tibia inclination exceeded trunk inclination (by at least 8°), the squat became knee extensor biased (i.e., hip/knee flexion moment ratio < 1.0).11”
  • Based on the findings of Barrack et al., it is possible to characterize the relative demand of the hip and knee extensors using the trunk-tibia inclination difference.

    “Based on the findings of Barrack et al., it is possible to characterize the relative demand of the hip and knee extensors using the trunk-tibia inclination difference.11”

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
CATERISANO, A., MOSS, R. E., PELLINGER, T. K., WOODRUFF, K., LEWIS, V. C., BOOTH, W., & KHADRA, T.
Affiliations
Furman University (US)
Venue
Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Published
2002-08
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
428-432
ISSN
1064-8011 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2171638501
Cited by
231
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 12
FWCI
0.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
Keywords
back squat, squat depth, electromyography, gluteus maximus, biceps femoris, vastus medialis, vastus lateralis, hip muscles, thigh muscle, muscle activation, concentric phase, resistance training
MeSH terms
Electromyography, Hip, Humans, Thigh, Weight Lifting, Exercise, Muscle, Skeletal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review