The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Changes in Sprint and Jump Performances After Traditional, Plyometric, and Combined Resistance Training in Male Youth Pre- and Post-Peak Height Velocity
Open accessAbstract
The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of 6-week training interventions using different modes of resistance (traditional strength, plyometric, and combined training) on sprinting and jumping performances in boys before and after peak height velocity (PHV). Eighty school-aged boys were categorized into 2 maturity groups (pre- or post-PHV) and then randomly assigned to (a) plyometric training, (b) traditional strength training, (c) combined training, or (d) a control group. Experimental groups participated in twice-weekly training programs for 6 weeks. Acceleration, maximal running velocity, squat jump height, and reactive strength index data were collected pre- and postintervention. All training groups made significant gains in measures of sprinting and jumping irrespective of the mode of resistance training and maturity. Plyometric training elicited the greatest gains across all performance variables in pre-PHV children, whereas combined training was the most effective in eliciting change in all performance variables for the post-PHV cohort. Statistical analysis indicated that plyometric training produced greater changes in squat jump and acceleration performances in the pre-PHV group compared with the post-PHV cohort. All other training responses between pre- and post-PHV cohorts were not significant and not clinically meaningful. The study indicates that plyometric training might be more effective in eliciting short-term gains in jumping and sprinting in boys who are pre-PHV, whereas those who are post-PHV may benefit from the additive stimulus of combined training.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“adolescents may be capable of greater absolute gains from training in comparison with adults, owing to concomitant growth and maturity-related adaptations (e.g. morphological changes and neural adaptations) [91].”
From Comparison of weightlifting, traditional resistance training and plyometrics on strength, power and speed: a systematic review with meta-analysis. (2022) · cites this paper as [91]
In the citing paper
“Differences in the adaptation mechanisms suggest a synergistic effect might be evident if both WLT and PLYO were included in a training programme [35, 91].”
From Comparison of weightlifting, traditional resistance training and plyometrics on strength, power and speed: a systematic review with meta-analysis. (2022) · cites this paper as [91]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Progressive Statistics for Studies in Sports Medicine and Exercise Science
HOPKINS, W. G., MARSHALL, S. W., BATTERHAM, A. M., & HANIN, J. (2009) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/mss.0b013e31818cb278 · Cited by 9,128
An assessment of maturity from anthropometric measurements
Mirwald, R. L., Baxter-Jones, A. D. G., Bailey, D. A., & Beunen, G. P. (2002) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1097/00005768-200204000-00020 · Cited by 2,364
Making Meaningful Inferences About Magnitudes
Batterham, A. M., & Hopkins, W. G. (2006) · International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance · doi:10.1123/ijspp.1.1.50 · Cited by 2,186
Fundamentals of Resistance Training: Progression and Exercise Prescription
KRAEMER, W. J., & RATAMESS, N. A. (2004) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/01.mss.0000121945.36635.61 · Cited by 1,992 · cited 1×
“using free weights or resistive machines (19), weightlifting”
MethodLongitudinal Mapping of Cortical Thickness and Brain Growth in Normal Children
Sowell, E. R., Thompson, P. M., Leonard, C. M., Welcome, S. E., Kan, E., & Toga, A. W. (2004) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1798-04.2004 · Cited by 1,481
International Olympic Committee consensus statement on youth athletic development
Bergeron, M. F., Mountjoy, M. L., Armstrong, N., Chia, M., Côté, J., Emery, C. A., Faigenbaum, A. D., Hall, G., Kriemler, S., Léglise, M., et al. (2015) · British Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1136/bjsports-2015-094962 · Cited by 1,018
Stretch-shortening cycle: a powerful model to study normal and fatigued muscle
Komi, P. V. (2000) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/s0021-9290(00)00064-6 · Cited by 975
The Youth Physical Development Model
Lloyd, R. S., & Oliver, J. L. (2012) · Strength and conditioning journal · doi:10.1519/ssc.0b013e31825760ea · Cited by 893
Self-citationSowell, E. R., Trauner, D. A., Gamst, A., & Jernigan, T. L. (2002) · Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology · doi:10.1017/s0012162201001591 · Cited by 701
Position statement on youth resistance training: the 2014 International Consensus
Lloyd, R. S., Faigenbaum, A. D., Stone, M. H., Oliver, J. L., Jeffreys, I., Moody, J. A., Brewer, C., Pierce, K. C., McCambridge, T. M., Howard, R., et al. (2014) · British Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1136/bjsports-2013-092952 · Cited by 584
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Morris, S. J., Oliver, J. L., Pedley, J. S., Haff, G. G., & Lloyd, R. S. (2022) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.1007/s40279-021-01627-2 · Cited by 103
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Lloyd, R. S., Radnor, J. M., De Ste Croix, M. B. A., Cronin, J. B., & Oliver, J. L.
- Affiliations
- University of Gloucestershire (GB)
- Cardiff Metropolitan University (GB)
- Edith Cowan University (AU)
- Auckland University of Technology (NZ)
- Corresponding author
- Lloyd, Rhodri S.
- Venue
- Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
- Published
- 2016-05
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1239-1247
- ISSN
- 1064-8011 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2257606578
- Cited by
- 198
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 5
- FWCI
- 10.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- eprints.glos.ac.uk
- Locations
- The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Repository (University of Gloucestershire) (submittedVersion)
- Cardiff Metropolitan Research Repository (Cardiff Metropolitan University) (submittedVersion)
- Australasian Journal of Paramedicine (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Physical Education and Training Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports injuries and prevention
- Keywords
- plyometric training, peak height velocity, sprint performance, jump performance, squat jump, reactive strength index, acceleration, adolescent boys, training response
- MeSH terms
- Acceleration, Adolescent, Child, Exercise Test, Humans, Male, Running, Muscle Strength, Athletic Performance, Resistance Training, Plyometric Exercise
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review