Cited by 65Sports Performance and TrainingCardiovascular and exercise physiologyMuscle metabolism and nutrition

Comparison of early phase adaptations for traditional strength and endurance, and low velocity resistance training programs in college-aged women

Rana, Sharon R, Chleboun, Gary S, Gilders, Roger M, Hagerman, Fredrick C, Herman, Jennifer R, Hikida, Robert S, Kushnick, Michael R, Staron, Robert S +1 more·2008·Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of a six-week (16-17 training sessions) low velocity resistance training program (LV) on various performance measures as compared to a traditional strength (TS) and a traditional muscular endurance (TE) resistance training program. Thirty-four healthy adult females (21.1 +/- 2.7 y) were randomly divided into 4 groups: control (C), TS, TE, and LV. Workouts consisted of 3 exercises: leg press (LP), back squat (SQ), and knee extension (KE). Each subject was pre- and posttested for 1 repetition maximum (1RM), muscular endurance, maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max), muscular power, and body composition. After the pretesting, TS, TE, and LV groups attended a minimum of 16 out of 17 training sessions in which the LP, SQ, and KE were performed to fatigue for each of 3 sets. For each training session, TS trained at 6-10 RM and TE trained at 20-30 RM both with 1-2 second concentric/1-2 second eccentric; and LV trained at 6-10 RM, with 10 second concentric/4 s eccentric. Statistical significance was determined at an alpha level of 0.05. LV increased relative LP and KE 1 RM, but the percent increase was smaller than TS, and not different from C in the SQ. For muscular endurance, LV improved similarly to TE for LP and less than TS and TE for KE. Body composition improved for all groups including C (significant main effect). In conclusion, muscular strength improved with LV training however, TS showed a larger improvement. Muscular e…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1519/jsc.0b013e31815f30e7

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rana, S. R., Chleboun, G. S., Gilders, R. M., Hagerman, F. C., Herman, J. R., Hikida, R. S., Kushnick, M. R., Staron, R. S., & Toma, K.
Affiliations
Ohio University (US)
Corresponding author
Rana, Sharon R
Venue
Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Published
2008-01
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
119-127
ISSN
1064-8011 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2022156990
Cited by
65
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
Keywords
muscular endurance training, one-repetition maximum, muscle strength, muscular endurance, VO2max, muscle power, body composition, college-aged women, leg press, back squat, knee extension, training load
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Physiological, Adult, Analysis of Variance, Anthropometry, Back, Body Composition, Female, Humans, Oxygen Consumption, Physical Education and Training, Physical Endurance, Probability, Sensitivity and Specificity, Universities, Weight Lifting, Lower Extremity, Muscle Strength

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review