Cited by 46Sports Performance and TrainingLower Extremity Biomechanics and PathologiesCardiovascular and exercise physiology

Magnitude and rate of mechanical loading of a variety of exercise modes

Ebben, William P, Fauth, McKenzie L, Kaufmann, Clare E, Petushek, Erich J·2010·Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

Abstract

This study evaluated impulse (I), peak ground reaction forces (GRF), and the rate of force development (RFD) of a variety of exercise modes for the purpose of estimating the magnitude and rate of mechanical loading as a measure of osteogenic potential. Twenty-three subjects participated in this study (mean +/- SD, age 21.2 +/- 1.4 years; body mass 77.8 +/- 16.2 kg). Kinetic data were obtained via a force platform for the test exercises modes, which included walking, jogging, depth jumps, loaded jump squats, and the back squat. Repeated measures analysis of variance revealed significant main effects for I, GRF, and RFD (p < or = 0.001). Bonferroni-adjusted post hoc analyses demonstrated that I and GRF were different between each exercise mode and that RFD was different between all exercise modes except for jogging and the back squat. The depth jump demonstrated the highest GRF and RFD, while the back squat produced the highest I. The jump squat produced the second highest value for all the variables assessed. Thus, the depth jump, jump squat, and back squat appear to offer the greatest potential as osteogenic stimuli and a mixed mode training strategy including exercises such as these is recommended. These results suggest that walking and jogging may have less osteogenic potential.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1519/jsc.0b013e3181c27da3

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Jumps induce high impact forces and internal muscle forces necessary for bone deformation and thus provide an osteo- and muscle-protective stimulus.

    “Furthermore, jumps induce high impact forces and internal muscle forces that are necessary for the deformation of bone and thus provide an osteo- and muscle-protective stimulus (Rittweger et al., 2000; Ebben et al., 2010).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ebben, W. P., Fauth, M. L., Kaufmann, C. E., & Petushek, E. J.
Affiliations
  • Marquette University (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–La Crosse (US)
Corresponding author
Ebben, William P
Venue
Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Published
2010-01
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
213-217
ISSN
1064-8011 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1971647530
Cited by
46
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
mechanical loading, osteogenic potential, impulse, peak ground reaction force, rate of force development, exercise mode, drop jump, jump squat, back squat, walking, jogging, bone loading
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Biomechanical Phenomena, Humans, Movement, Exercise, Weight-Bearing, Muscle, Skeletal, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review