Cited by 19Sports Performance and TrainingSport Psychology and PerformancePhysical Education and Training Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Reaction Time in the Agility Test Under Simulated Competitive and Noncompetitive Conditions

Zemková, Erika, Vilman, Tomáš, Kováčiková, Zuzana, Hamar, Dušan·2013·Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

Abstract

The study evaluates a reaction time in the Agility Test under simulated competitive and noncompetitive conditions. A group of 16 fit men performed, in random order, 2 versions of the Agility Test: non-competitive Agility Single and Agility Dual in form of simulated competition. In both cases, subjects had to touch, as fast as possible, with either the left or the right foot 1 of 4 mats located in 4 corners outside of an 80 cm square. Mats had to be touched in accordance with the location of the stimulus in one of the corners of the screen. The test consisted of 20 visual stimuli with random generation of their location on the screen and time generation from 500 to 2,500 milliseconds. The result was total reaction time (RT) for all 20 reactions measured by a PC-based system FiTRO Agility Check. Results showed significantly (p < 0.01) better RT in the Agility Dual than in the Agility Single Test (690.6 ± 83.8 milliseconds and 805.8 ± 101.1 milliseconds, respectively). Further comparisons of RT under noncompetitive and simulated competitive conditions for the best 8 subjects proceeded in the second match showed a decrease from 781.3 ± 111.2 milliseconds to 693.6 ± 97.8 milliseconds in the first match and to 637.0 ± 53.0 milliseconds in the second match. It may be concluded that RT is better when the Agility Test is performed in simulated competitive than noncompetitive conditions. The Agility Test in form of competition may be used for children and young athletes to enhance their attention level and motivation.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1519/jsc.0b013e3182903222

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 19

Metadata

Authors
Zemková, E., Vilman, T., Kováčiková, Z., & Hamar, D.
Affiliations
  • Palacký University Olomouc (CZ)
  • Comenius University Bratislava (SK)
Corresponding author
Zemková, Erika
Venue
Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Published
2013-12
Volume
27
Issue
12
Pages
3445-3449
ISSN
1064-8011 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2063102377
Cited by
19
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Slovenská Akadémia Vied
  • Vedecká Grantová Agentúra MŠVVaŠ SR a SAV
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Physical Education and Training Studies
Keywords
reaction time, agility test, simulated competition, competitive environment, attention, motivation, youth athletes, children
MeSH terms
Adult, Competitive Behavior, Humans, Male, Reaction Time, Athletic Performance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reaction Time in the Agility Test Under Simulated Competitive and Noncompetitive Conditions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1519/jsc.0b013e3182903222
The paper
Zemková, E., Vilman, T., Kováčiková, Z., & Hamar, D. (2013). Reaction Time in the Agility Test Under Simulated Competitive and Noncompetitive Conditions. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. https://doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0b013e3182903222